John McCain, Mitt Romney, and America’s Insane Foreign Policy

Last updated on: January 19, 2015 at 5:07 am by Adam Ericksen

John McCain, Mitt Romney, and America’s Insane Foreign Policy 2015-01-16T15:09:37-05:00 Adam Ericksen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John McCain recently held a press conference where he speculated on a third Mitt Romney presidential campaign. He said that Romney would be a “viable” candidate, especially when it comes to foreign policy. Just to show how good Romney’s foreign policy would be, he attacked Barack Obama’s foreign policy.

Welcome to the presidential campaign.

McCain stated about the debates between Romney and Obama during the run up to the previous election,

One of the rationales that Governor Romney is using, and I think it’s legitimate, is that the major factor in these debates was the issue of foreign policy. Obviously, the picture of the world that Barack Obama painted in those debates, Osama bin Laden is dead, Al-Qaeda core is decimate, on and on and on, the President of the United States painted a view of the world which has turned out to be patently false and more dangerous.

The word “obviously” sticks out to me. I’m not exactly sure what McCain means by “on and on and on,” but the fact is that bin Laden is dead and the Al-Qaeda core is decimated. Those are both patently true.

But if McCain’s larger point is that Obama’s foreign policy has been a debacle, I’d agree. I don’t think the world is safer than it was eight years ago. I think we are in a very dangerous situation and Obama bears some responsibility for it.

But let’s not kid ourselves, McCain and Romney have essentially the same foreign policy as Obama. Sure, presidential candidates will attempt to show how different their policies are, but I guarantee that their policies will be have the same essence.

And that essence is violence.

Just look at how “successful” Obama’s foreign policy has been. Bin Laden is dead. Al Qaeda has been significantly decimated. And yet the world is still a dangerous place!

I think it’s time to admit that the United States fundamentally has the wrong approach to foreign policy.

Violence and warfare are only creating more terrorists. Why have we been fighting the War on Terror for 13 years – with a Republican and a Democratic president, and yet we keep seeing more terrorists? Because, as René Girard has taught us, violence is mimetic. It never exhausts itself, but only fuels more violence. Girard states in his book Violence and the Sacred that, “The mechanism of reciprocal violence can be described as a vicious circle.”

The only thing that’s obvious is that America’s violent foreign policy is playing a significant role in creating a world where a vicious circle of violence rules the day.

America has options in our foreign policy, of course. The most important thing our political leaders can do is to critique violence – especially our own. We can blame “terrorists” all we want for their violence, but blaming them lets us off the hook for our own violence that only creates more hostility and violence in the world.

What’s the solution? As Jean-Michel Oughourlian says in his book Psychopolitics, we need a foreign policy that refuses to finance perpetual war and one that purchases peace:

Instead of spending astronomical sums on arms, let us spend instead on roads, hospitals, schools, houses, businesses, to create jobs and so on. Instead of financing war, let us purchase peace.

Albert Einstein defined insanity as “doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.” America’s foreign policy is insane. We keep using violent methods, over and over again, and expect it will create a more peaceful world. It won’t. The only hope we have for a more peaceful world is to use peaceful methods.

If we don’t have a radical shift in foreign policy, our insane use of violence will doom us to a future of apocalyptic violence.

But we do have options and Oughourlian sums them up as well as anyone: “Instead of financing war, let us purchase peace.”

Previous Post

January 14, 2015

4 Things You Need to Know about Terrorism and Religion

Next Post

January 21, 2015 Who is God? Part 1: God is Love

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement and Current Events Curriculum Faith and Families Interviews Jesus the Forgiving Victim Lent Montessori politics Reviews The Bible Explained Uncategorized Valentine's Day Wednesday Sermon Who is God?

Select a Month July 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 January 2014 December 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz