Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Teaching Nonviolent Atonement

How Christians Should Respond to President Obama: On Fear, Violence, and Safety

Last updated on: December 31, 2014 at 4:45 pm   by Adam Ericksen

How Christians Should Respond to President Obama: On Fear, Violence, and Safety 2014-12-31T16:45:59-05:00 Adam Ericksen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Do you feel safe?

President Obama made his case for war against ISIS during his address to the nation last night. He juxtaposed two statements that sum up the contradictory message that American presidents have been telling us with a straight face since at least the Vietnam War:

America is safer. Still, we continue to face a terrorist threat.

I don’t feel safe. We’ve been fighting the “War on Terror” for 13 years – and what have we earned for that effort? More terrorists!

At the beginning of his speech, the President predictably listed his litany of accomplishments, including killing Osama Bin Laden and al Qaeda’s leadership in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.

But throughout his speech, he was clear that we are not safe, that “If left unchecked, these terrorists could pose a growing threat beyond that region – including the United States.”

There is one emotion that both President Obama and President Bush have consistently tried to induce – fear. Last night’s message was about fear. We were told that ISIS is a threat to the world and that our objective in going to war is based on the same failed objective we’ve had since Vietnam – “we will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy.”

That counter-terrorism strategy is the same strategy that has failed and will continue to fail us – the use of violence to defeat violence.

Why does violence fail? Because it is mimetic. Violence leads to imitation and escalation of violence. René Girard states in his book Battling to the End that “violent imitation is the rule today, not the imitation that slows and suspends the flow, but the one that accelerates it.”

Fear and violence are both contagious. They spread throughout communities like a disease. “We” fear “them” and “they” fear “us.” And the only way that either side knows how to deal with the other is through violence that only ensures more violence.

America’s violent fight for freedom has only enslaved us to a future of fear.

So, how can we be safe? Here’s the difficult answer that we learn from the wisdom of Christianity – we can’t.

We can’t be safe because we are vulnerable and finite. Christianity makes the radical claim that God is not the one who comes in and makes us safe through violently defeating our enemies. Christianity doesn’t promise safety, and any politician who promises safety through violence is either naïve or lying.

But this is no naïve pacifism. Non-violent strategies don’t promise safety. Yet, for Christians who take seriously the call to follow Christ, we must reckon with the fact that at every point Jesus was tempted to use violence to protect himself or his friends, he refused. Whenever his disciples tempted him to be the violent Messiah and kill the Romans who were terrorizing them, he refused. When his disciples tempted Jesus to call down fire and brimstone on those who rejected them, Jesus refused. When Peter decided to protect Jesus from his captors with a sword, Jesus rebuked him and told him to put his sword back in his place, for those who live by the sword die by the sword.

The same words that Jesus spoke to Peter, he speaks now to us. Yet Christians continue to put our fingers in our ears and yell “LALALALA” to the words of Jesus. We don’t have faith in Jesus. We have faith in violence.

Love isn’t the answer to safety and security. After all, even Jesus was crucified. But love is the answer to fear. Nonviolent love is our hope.

On the morning of 9/11/2014, the morning after President Obama made his case for war, he spoke to the victims’ families of 9/11/2001. He claimed that “Your love is the ultimate rebuke to the hatred of those who attacked us.” That sounds like a nice answer to hatred, doesn’t it? But Obama was wrong. Love is not a rebuke. There is no violence in love.

People always want answers. The best answer I’ve read comes from economist Jeffrey Sachs, who says that we might live in a more safe and secure world if we did something very Jesus-like, if instead of bombings we committed acts of love. Sachs claims we would do better if we,

Mobilized to solve the real problems facing the region: poverty, hunger, drought, and unemployment. Those are the crises that at the end of the day cause men and boys to fling their lives into useless and suicidal slaughter. If just once in our times US politicians had the bravery to build coalitions to improve the lives of the people through development rather than through bombs, the US public would be amazed to see how much agreement and goodwill could quickly generate. Instead, we head to war.

Those acts of nonviolent love might not lead to greater safety, but the alternative has only created an imitative contagion of escalating violence. And so it’s time for Christians to choose another way. It’s time for Christians to pray, exhort, plead, and lobby for our political leaders to choose the nonviolent and loving way of Jesus.

Uncategorized

isis

Jesus

mimetic theory

obama

pacifism

peace

safety

violence

war

Previous Post



September 10, 2014

The NFL, Ray Rice, and Keith Olbermann – I Accuse Us

Next Post



September 16, 2014 What ISIL Beheadings Can Teach Us about God and The Cross


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement and Current Events Curriculum Faith and Families Interviews Jesus the Forgiving Victim Lent Montessori politics Reviews The Bible Explained Uncategorized Valentine's Day Wednesday Sermon Who is God?

Select a Month July 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 January 2014 December 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What vision did Daniel have of four beasts representing empires?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ox, ram, goat, lion Lion, bear, leopard, terrifying beast Four dragons Horse, eagle, serpent, leopard

Related posts from Teaching Nonviolent Atonement

Progressive Christian

Forgiveness in the Time of COVID-19 by Julia...

Teaching Nonviolent Atonement

Progressive Christian

Is Pacifism A Luxury?

Teaching Nonviolent Atonement

Progressive Christian

Reflections on Indigenous Wisdom For Healing A Wounded...

Teaching Nonviolent Atonement

Progressive Christian

How Forgiveness Can Transform Our Violence and Build...

Teaching Nonviolent Atonement

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube