Clarifying the Issues

Last updated on: November 23, 2011 at 12:49 pm by David Swartz

Clarifying the Issues 2011-11-23T12:49:13-07:00 David Swartz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[This post by David Swartz is part of a conversation hosted at the Patheos Book Club on the new book, Left, Right & Christ: Evangelical Faith in Politics, by Lisa Sharon Harper and D.C. Innes.]

It’s that time of year that would bring a smile to Friedrich Nietzsche’s face, even though, with that national forest he grew on his upper lip, who would know? Possessor of one of the greatest moustaches in intellectual history, Nietzsche launched ideas and phrases like the “death of God”, “Ubermensch (Super Man)” and “will to power” (even if he didn’t write the book) into world history and the modern conversation of ideas. In discussing “will to power”, he postulated the idea that no matter what someone’s beliefs, religion, ideology, and philosophy might be, and even with the highest ideals and best of intentions, every human enterprise inevitably boils down into suppressing every competing impulse in order to seize and maintain control. We stand one year away from the next presidential election; the games and circuses have already begun. With serious internal issues and volatile international concerns, American politics may be more partisan (us vs. them), more emotional and less thoughtful, more driven by rapidly proliferating selfish factions and less by any idea of the common good than at any time in recent history.

That’s why Left, Right and Christ featuring Lisa Harper and D.C. Innes is a good idea. The book takes two people, Harper (Democrat) and Innes (Republican), who take the Bible very seriously and gives them both room to lay out how Jesus informs their politics. Harper is a former staffer with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship who now serves as Director of Mobilization for Sojourners. Innes teaches political theory at King’s College in NYC, blogs for World Magazine and is a teaching elder in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church.

The methodology of the book marks it as noteworthy just as much, if not more, than its content. First the reader gets two introductions instead of one. Jim Wallis, founder of Sojourners and one of evangelicalism’s prophetic social voices, and Marvin Olasky, editor of World Magazine and author of a number of scholarly works on politics and social issues, both chip in. What I would like to do is lock these two in a room and see what happens. Olasky, a Yalee, speaks shrewdly and with dry wit. Wallis makes one of the best statements I’ve seen in print on Christians and politics (page 11). The book extends this editorial style. This isn’t a debate or argument, no back and forth or call and response. Both Harper and Innes give their stories and perspective uninterrupted, thoughtfully laid out and then placed side by side. We hear extended thinking on how two people calling themselves evangelicals spiritually arrived where they are now – Harper from a broad multicultural background and Innes, a Canadian who became an American citizen as an adult.

They issue a joint statement (Our Common Ground) of theology affirming what they biblically have in common. And it’s a serious theological statement, not the mindless drivel that “all religions say basically the same thing.” Both Harper and Innes work hard intellectually and theologically throughout the book. Once past this, they deal with two chapters on foundational issues for them – the role of government and the role of business (capitalism and poverty). While most of us would bypass these to get to the “issues”, it’s good to chew slowly on what both say since many experts say (and I agree) that we are becoming a nation of individuals who expect the government to make us happy on our own personal terms – rapidly making us an ungovernable people.

Then the two of them get into the things that candidates will be ringing the changes on for the next twelve months. The next six chapters cover health care, abortion, same sex marriage, immigration, war and terrorism and the environment. In a number of these cases, I began thinking I knew where I stood but both Harper and Innes repeatedly made me say “Hmm”. Using both Scripture and good research, they will engage the reader and evoke the same response whether we change our position or not. The chapter on health care, for example, requires both of their takes to be fully biblical in theology and socially responsible. The chapter on abortion documents that, in spite of how evangelicals are stereotyped that this is the defining issue, we were a little slow getting involved even after Rowe v.Wade. The little donkeys and elephants marking page numbers also help the reader to quick reference one side or the other on each issue.

The book ends on two valuable notes. Both authors write their “thank yous” and include generous and friendly words about the other. Harper notes her enjoying the humor and wit of Innes’ emails. She remarks how he made he think harder (This is always a good thing and is becoming an endangered species). They enjoyed doing this. It wasn’t about winning. The second note comes in the form of a good bibliography covering both the foundational issues and each of the six issues that follow. Each author gives six or seven titles on each issue giving good follow up potential for the reader.

In the months to come, we will need to remain clear, not merely on who is for what on each issue, but as to what the issue itself means. It’s like TV Guide. I can pick it up any time I need it. “Left, Right and Christ” has staying power beyond the first read. Politics should not be about winning, about power for power’s sake. It’s about bringing power to bear on human problems to produce solutions for the common good. This book gives us a handy pickup, a quality refresher, to intelligently think through at a deeper level the things blaring through the media from people wanting to push our voting button. I’m getting more and more particular (even touchy) about whom I let do that and I unhesitatingly suggest the same to the reader. We’ll be smarter and more effective, not just as voters at every level, but as Jesus followers at every level. Because we follow Him, it’s not about winning but serving with an eye toward redeeming and freedom from things that strangle and kill – in personal lives, in society and through cultures.

David Swartz pastors Bethel Baptist Church in Roseville, Michigan. He thinks that jazz is sacred music, that books are better company than most people, and that university towns rock. He blogs at geezeronthequad.com.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 22, 2011

Left, Right, and Christ: Our Common Ground

Next Post

November 23, 2011 Left, Right, and That Other One

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Author Q&A Book Review Christian Living Church Leadership Stump a Scholar Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2022 March 2021 October 2020 August 2020 February 2019 November 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city did David capture and make his capital?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gibeon Jerusalem Hebron Bethlehem