Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

suspended in her jar

Home
Catholic
Some Considerations For Atheists In Dialogue With Christians

Some Considerations For Atheists In Dialogue With Christians

Last updated on: July 8, 2020 at 12:40 pm by Guest Contributor

Some Considerations For Atheists In Dialogue With Christians 2020-07-08T12:40:20-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by guest writer William M. Shea

The large point of difference between atheists and agnostics on one hand and my brand of Christian thinking on the other is this: I can know that God exists. In fact I have known and do know. I’m not saying this to promote an argument but only because I think I should put my cards on the table. To be brief, I can locate three possible ways of coming to the conclusion that God exists: community ethos and symbols; common sense experience, insight and judgment; and, later in life, philosophical reflection. In addition to knowing God I also believe in God because I’ve found in eighty years of life that it’s good for me to believe. I am a Christian because I found out that being Christian, acting, believing and worshiping, are good for me. Catholic Christian faith has turned out to be a chosen way of living, an immense benefit, a practice that illuminates the world and my own existence in it. Philosophical reflection is merely a circumstantial yet important support to a way of living, to a way of believing, and to a way of knowing. This is the briefest possible way of stating “where I stand.” And I assume that an atheist, too, has found his/her own stance to be every bit as good for him/her as I do mine.

In the immediately preceding post I tried to unfold gifts that, in my opinion, the atheist movement and writings and stance have to contribute to Christian thinking. I must confess that a large part of my poor brain has been educated by atheists and atheism. They constitute a significant part of the intellectual culture that I call my own. I have been paying attention to them since I began to study under them at Columbia University School of Philosophy in the late sixties. So, they’ve helped me think about my ‘way of life’ and, paradoxically, made me a more informed and self-conscious Catholic. Here are a few thoughts I’ve had that might be useful to them in terms of a badly needed dialogue.[1]

Generally speaking, the epistemological thinking behind atheism can be expressed in two terms: empiricism and scientism. They are not the same but they surely overlap. Empiricism can be taken to mean that the contents of human experience, often viewed as sense experience (David Hume, Immanuel Kant) and sometimes more broadly as the interaction between the world and our probing intelligence (John Dewey). Scientism I take to be a fully formed philosophical judgement that scientific method is the only way to knowledge of any truths about ourselves and our world. Religious thinkers, of course, deny that the empirical limits human knowing and that science is the only way to genuine knowledge. They think that human knowing can and does transcend the empirical limits set to it. There are an awful lot of very smart theologians and philosophers throughout history who have concluded to and argued this position, from the great Greeks to Augustine, Aquinas and Newman and in our own century Royce, Hocking, Lonergan, Rahner, Hartshorne and Plantinga. Unless we dismiss these people as “not so bright” or merely deluded as Dawkins et al. seem to do, atheists can benefit from seeing the world in a different cognitive horizon than their own. There just might be something to learn here, not so much in terms of argument but of our understanding one another.
A second old bone on which to chew: There has been an awful lot of Christian noise about atheism and the possibility of an ethical life. If you don’t believe you won’t do good, simply put. Another way of putting it is this: if there are no punishments in the afterlife there are no limits to human depravity. Sin will out! Christians have often suspected that atheism is the big step toward nihilism. But there has been significant development in some Christian thinking in the past century. As there is a human desire to know, there is a desire for the good and even the common good, which is distinct from the desire to know God, interrelated to be sure but still distinct. In other words, atheism involves natural ethical judgement, individual and social ethical growth, and even what Christians like Pope Francis names the “call to holiness.” Doesn’t this place another relevant issue on the table of dialogue?
What does faith mean? Do they have it? Faith includes trust in existence as well as being a divine gift. Manifestly atheists rest on the first else atheists wouldn’t move much less think. According to Schubert Ogden and David Tracy such faith is ingredient to common human experience. The absence of faith of this sort might lead to madness or suicide. The question is whether this sort of faith overlaps the faith of which St. Paul speaks so eloquently in the Letter to the Romans. This sort is called “animal faith” by George Santayana with good reason. But can atheism be faith-filled? Can we trust and hope without God? It would seem to be so. But why?
We humans know a little and we universally believe much more. Since Christians commonly think they know God exist and believe a lot more about God (e.g. God is Love, God is triune) none of which I would claim as knowledge strictly taken, can atheists also be called upon to say what they know as distinct from what they believe about God? Does the distinction hold?
Do they know that God does not exist and how do they do so? Do they mean they believe that He doesn’t because they don’t find evidence enough in the empirical? Is atheism the same as agnosticism with simply an added dose of conviction?
We, the atheists and agnostics and the Christian believers, are clearly under different intellectual, experiential, and spiritual bubbles. Granted this fact, are the bubbles mutually impenetrable? The last four popes didn’t think so. How about you?

William M. Shea, Ph.D.

[1] I also better understand why the Catholic Church once had The Index of Forbidden Books. Aside from the boors and polemicists among them, they are often an intellectually gifted bunch and a tough read. While I am not a fan of the New Atheists, I am of Feuerbach, Santayana, Dewey, Randall and the American Naturalists generally. They all thought carefully about religion sans cheap shots.

image credit: Woman-Shadow-Pair-Abstract-Man-101279.jpg

Previous Post

July 5, 2020

What Can We Learn From Atheism?

Next Post

July 18, 2020 It Is Clear By Now that We Are Not All In This Together

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what color is the horse ridden by Death?

Select your answer to see how you score.

White Red Pale (or green) Black

Support this
Column