Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

suspended in her jar

Dear Pope Francis: This Kind of Language About Abortion is Not Helping

Last updated on: May 26, 2019 at 12:56 pm   by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

Dear Pope Francis: This Kind of Language About Abortion is Not Helping 2019-05-26T12:56:09-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Once again, Pope Francis has compared having an abortion to “hiring a hitman.” As reported in CBS News:

Pope Francis on Saturday said abortion can never be condoned, even when the fetus is gravely sick or malformed. He is urging doctors and priests to support families to carry such pregnancies to term.

During an audience with participants of a Vatican-sponsored anti-abortion conference, Francis said opposition to abortion isn’t a religious issue but a human one: “Is it licit to throw away a life to resolve a problem? Is it licit to hire a hitman to resolve a problem?”

Francis denounced decisions to abort based on prenatal testing, saying a human being is “never incompatible with life.” The pope has spoken out strongly against abortion, though he has also expressed sympathy for women who have had them and made it easier for them to be forgiven.

I have made no secret of my admiration and support of Francis, but I do not believe he is above or beyond criticism, and his gaffes tend most often to appear in his remarks about women, sexuality, and the abuse crisis. I don’t pin this wholly on him as a person: the issue is systemic, connected with the institutional church’s own problems when it comes to sorting out genuine Christian teaching from attitudes and prejudices inherited from patriarchal civilizations. It would probably be impossible for any man to rise far enough through the ranks of the hierarchy to become pope without having thoroughly imbibed these attitudes and prejudices.

Dangerous comparisons

In this case, as much as I welcome the pope’s emphasis on mercy and forgiveness, I find his language, especially his use once again of this analogy, to be unfortunate, misleading, and even dangerous.

This is not because I deny the dignity of life of the unborn. I have said before that being pro-life ought to mean drawing the circle of protection as widely as possible, though perhaps at this point the term “pro-life” has been too sullied by bad associations with racism and sexism to be worth the effort of salvage. Whatever we want to call it, a good ethic means one that protects all life in all stages, and opposes systemic violence and oppression.

But in so doing we need to be realistic about the context for human choices. It’s interesting that some Christians will bend over backwards to defend the atrocity of the U.S.’s nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and defend nineteenth-century slaveowners as mere products of their time, but give zero credence to the reality that women, for the most part, are not choosing abortion as an act of privilege and power, but as an act of desperation.

We do not live in a society that makes it easy for women to choose life, even in the best of circumstances, and the reality of nature and biology is that pregnancy and childbearing – which rest entirely on women – can be burdensome, painful, terrifying, traumatic, dangerous, and life-threatening.

While so-called “late term abortion” is rare, these cases get held up as instances of violent eugenics, when in reality they are often desperate measures to save not only the life of the mother, but also to protect the unborn child from dying in excruciating agony, slowly. Bioethical discussion about these cases must always privilege sanctity of life, but should not a) leave out the sanctity of life of the mother, or b) pretend that extreme pain and suffering are not moral evils to be avoided and prevented.

Utterly different contexts

Hiring a hitman to solve a problem is an act of violent indifference by the powerful and privileged. It takes money and clout and political protection to do such a thing.

Having an abortion is in no way comparable to this. Often it is a choice made precisely because of lack of money, clout, or political protection. Regarding women who make these choices as though they were heartless mob bosses creates a culture of misogyny and fear in which women may find themselves at increased risk of violence. 

Remember, a considerable percentage of women who have abortions have children already, love their children, are trying the best they can to care for them, and sometimes feel that the prospect of bringing another into an already difficult situation would be impossible.

If we truly care about the lives of the unborn, we need to be honest about the unique context of abortion, the unique vulnerability of a pregnant woman, and do what we can to create a culture in which real and legitimate choices are available to women. This means access to affordable health care, especially when women and babies are threatened by severe life-threatening conditions that require extensive and emergency aid. This means ending the culture of discrimination against women and our bodies, opposing all rape tolerance, mandating paid parental leave. It means effective sex ed that puts women in control of their own reproductivity. Stop treating women as mere “host bodies” or incubators that belong under male control.

Pro-choice activists often ask pro-lifers, why aren’t you supporting these things? Well, I am supporting them, as the best way to create a society that is healthy for both women and babies.

But as long as the vast majority of the pro-life movement continues to support, enthusiastically, right-wing policies and candidates, they can not say the same. And as long as our religious leaders continue to make bad comparisons that fail to address the reality of the situation, not only will the problem not be solved; it might even be compounded.

image credit: picryl.com/media/art-stone-pregnant-e19e01?zoom=true

abortion

abortion

bioethics

bombing

health care

hiroshima and nagasaki

hit-man

parental leave

pope francis

pro-choice

pro-life

slaveowners

Previous Post



May 26, 2019

"The Things I Do For Love" - Game of Thrones, The Classics, and the Human Condition

Next Post



June 5, 2019 When Did Jesus Call Anyone to a Secondary Role in the Church?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group emphasizes speaking in tongues as evidence of faith?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Methodists Pentecostals Catholics Presbyterians

Support this
Column

Related posts from suspended in her jar

Catholic

We Need to Be Honest When We Talk...

suspended in her jar

Catholic

Making a Difference: Reflections on Pope Francis’ 2021...

suspended in her jar

Catholic

A Martyrdom Of Our Own Making

suspended in her jar

Catholic

What Is Wrong With the Christian Religion?

suspended in her jar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube