Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

suspended in her jar

Home
Catholic
I Spent NFP Awareness Week In Conversation With Questioners

I Spent NFP Awareness Week In Conversation With Questioners

Last updated on: July 28, 2018 at 12:04 am by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

I Spent NFP Awareness Week In Conversation With Questioners 2018-07-28T00:04:43-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It was NFP awareness week, and I celebrated it by engaging in a number of conversations about Humanae Vitae.

I almost added “and by practicing NFP, of course,” but I’m trying to recover from that toxic culture in which one has to constantly violate the TMI rule about middle-aged married life, simply in order to reassure everyone that all marital relations have been magisterially approved.

I’m done caring what those people think, done defending myself for having “only” three kids, done arguing that yes, I had “grave reasons” for NFP, and that “grave reasons” is a crappy translation from the original Latin anyway.

No one needs to know whether I was or am practicing NFP or not. And probably most folks don’t care, or would really rather not hear me give the personal details about it.

Connected with this freedom is the freedom to talk about issues people have with the magisterial teaching. And it’s a freedom that, for many of us, has been hard won, because in an intellectual arena where Catholic speakers and writers feel comfortable openly mocking the church’s social teachings, and frequently misrepresent the church’s fundamental moral definitions in order to show how hardass they are, there is a taboo on questioning the teaching on contraception, in any way. Even if it is a purely intellectual questioning on the part of people who have never disobeyed it. Some of these may obey because teachings on contraception don’t personally affect them, in their walk in life. Others may obey because NFP has been helpful for them, and they’ve never felt the desperate need to look to other resources to preserve their marriage, financial survival, or sanity.

Nevertheless, they question what seems to be a teaching hastily thrown together, suspiciously defended on the grounds of “maintaining authority.” They question because the promises of grace through obedience appear not to have been met, for many. Because if, as Humanae Vitae says, contraception is so bad, one ought to see clear evidence of the difference in love, loyalty, and virtue between couples who use contraception and those who don’t.

In the course of my conversations, over this past week, two things became increasingly apparent. The first was the integrity and good faith of the questioners. These are people who have spent years studying and even teaching the content of Humanae Vitae. Some are NFP instructors. Some have poured all their energy into trying to obey. They are not selfish hedonists seeking simply to use the other, or to live a life of materialist leisure without children. Their concerns have to do with survival – survival, often, in the context of large families that give shining evidence of their openness to life and their willingness to sacrifice. Sometimes it’s a life issue. So many women have said, the doctors told me I might die. We elevate the lives of women who died for their unborn babies, rather than abort, but this isn’t abortion we’re talking about. So it seems as though the same people who say all sacrifices must be made for the unborn child have zero concern for the sanctity of life of women.

Willingness to sacrifice – at what point does this become fetishized to a degree that is anti-life, and anti-person?

The other thing I saw was, again, how quickly people bash those who are questioning in this one particular area. That it is sometimes a questioning not only on the level of theory, but through years of painful practice, makes this all the more troubling. Even if it’s not bashing, people are so quick to draw a line in the sand, between “Catholic” and “Non Catholic.”

This is an excellent way to chase people out of the church.

The reality of the human experience is that we are not always able to make everything line up with perfect clarity. We may believe fully in Jesus, the Trinity, in Mary Queen of Heaven, in the Sacraments, the truth of the church. We may be able to recite the Creed with untroubled faith. But if we can not force ourselves to believe this one item – an item not even touched on in the Gospels, not one of the two Great Commandments Jesus gave – suddenly, we’re supposed to just ditch all the rest?

Yet we live every day amidst apparent contradictions, and unsettled conflict. If we couldn’t live this way, no friendship would survive. We live every day in mystery.

Ultimately our membership in the church is about relation to the Divine, not about assent to teachings – framed as they are by merely human teachers, couched in frail and ambiguous human language, often not even taught until fairly recently in the history of the church. So we should not be forced into a “choose A or B” scenario over this one deeply personal issue. Trying to force this, especially at this particular moment, when many are shocked and angry about new sex abuse revelations – and about church leaders’ complicity therein – is a really, really bad witness.

And anyway, whenever a person’s questioning of an article of faith is met with violence and silencing, it looks like over-compensation. It looks like fear. It looks ugly. People need to be able to speak up about their experiences without immediately being pounced on: Are you questioning the church’s teaching? Are you? ARE YOU?

Well, suppose they are. What then? Are they to be forcibly excommunicated? Screenshots sent to their Catholic employers, so maybe they can lose their job and their income (so pro-family)? Are they to be shamed and silenced?

Or can we, maybe, resume the conversation that got cut off rather abruply back in 1968?

image credit: www.flickr.com/photos/97481684@N08/13966480422

Previous Post

July 23, 2018

Of Blackberries, Summer, and the Frailty of Time

Next Post

August 14, 2018 On The Clerical Sex Abuse Scandal, Scapegoating, and Justice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was called by God from a burning bush to lead Israel out of Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joshua Aaron Moses Joseph

Support this
Column