Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

suspended in her jar

SCOTUS Pick Kavanaugh Argued a Sitting President Shouldn’t Be Indicted, Will Respect Abortion Precedent

Last updated on: July 9, 2018 at 10:28 pm   by guest writer

SCOTUS Pick Kavanaugh Argued a Sitting President Shouldn’t Be Indicted, Will Respect Abortion Precedent 2018-07-09T22:28:52-04:00 guest writer

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Two years ago, as the November presidential elections loomed large, conservatives and pro-lifers were breathlessly assuring us all that it was necessary to hold our noses and vote GOP for the sake of those magical supreme court picks, and the promise of making abortion disappear once and for all.  

In spite of legal experts’ assurance that simply overturning Roe is not the way these things work, and in spite of the fact that Roe was decided on with a Republican majority court, and in spite of the fact that at no point in any Republican presidency has abortion been made illegal – on the contrary, abortions rates have gone up – we were told that we had to support Trump, because of the supreme court, and thus the babies (but only, it turns out, the unborn ones: once they are born, it is acceptable to kidnap them, and cage them). 

Well, now here we are. Trump got Gorsuch, and now, with Justice Kennedy’s retirement, the moment we were told to await has arrived.

Trump’s supreme court pick, Brett Kavanaugh, is probably best remembered for his involvement in Clinton’s impeachment hearings along with Ken Starr back in the 90s. At the time, he argued for holding presidents to high moral standards, but afterwards changed his mind. In a 1998 law review article he argued that it might not be constitutional to allow indictment of a sitting president. As a New York Times piece states:

“My chief takeaway from working in the White House for five and a half years — and particularly from my nearly three years of work as staff secretary, when I was fortunate to travel the country and the world with President Bush — is that the job of president is far more difficult than any other civilian position in government,” he wrote.

He concluded that sitting presidents should not be distracted by civil suits or criminal proceedings. “A president who is concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation,” he wrote, “is almost inevitably going to do a worse job as president.”

Why yes, that’s right. Kavanaugh essentially believes that a sitting president should not be held to the legal standards ordinary citizens must observe. Fascinating. This would be disturbing in any context, but it is especially alarming considering the fact that Trump himself faces charges of criminal misconduct, and that his supporters have already promoted the idea that a president should be above the law. One wonders whether they would have argued similarly had Hillary been elected by the electoral college as well as the popular vote.

Similarly fascinating is the fact that Kavanaugh has stated that he will “respect precedent on abortion.”

Because my own pro-life beliefs emphasize helping women escape from situations in which abortion is desirable, I don’t have a lot invested in whether or not Roe is overturned, since either way we face ethical issues. But it is interesting to see where Trump’s first priorities lie: not with any attempt to protect unborn life, however clumsy, but rather with protecting his precious self.  

Pro-choice feminists who have been worrying about Roe being overturned probably need not fear on that account, but the continued legality of abortion seems like it could only be cold comfort to them, when the circumstances that drive women to seek abortion will continue to be exacerbated by an administration with a social darwinist, ethno-nationalist, and eugenic agenda – insofar as it has any agenda at all, other than further inflating the ego of Donald Trump.

image credit: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/06/images/20060601-4_d-0327-3-565v.html

abortion

ethics

politics

abortion

Bill Clinton

Brett Kavanaugh

Ken Starr

pro-choice

pro-life

roe vs. wade

SCOTUS

Trump

Previous Post



July 4, 2018

An Independence Day Reminder: We Are Not Free

Next Post



July 12, 2018 The Pro-Life Movement Has Lost


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for wearing black hats and beards?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Orthodox Jews Amish Quakers Mennonites

Support this
Column

Related posts from suspended in her jar

Catholic

Immigrants: They Need Us, and We Need Them

suspended in her jar

Catholic

Four Takeaways from Oprah’s Interview with the Duke...

suspended in her jar

Catholic

How Has the Pandemic Changed Us? Has It...

suspended in her jar

Catholic

Rush Limbaugh Would Never Have Succeeded In an...

suspended in her jar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube