Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

suspended in her jar

Home
Catholic
“Fine Folks” and the Banality of Evil

“Fine Folks” and the Banality of Evil

Last updated on: September 8, 2017 at 2:59 pm by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

“Fine Folks” and the Banality of Evil 2017-09-08T14:59:33-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“There are no nice Nazis!” said Senator Bernie Sanders at a town hall meeting in Detroit, responding to Trump’s equivocation in regards to the violence in Charlottesville.

I wish I could agree with him. It would be so much easier to identify those who support genocide, if they were all menacing cartoon villains, or sterotypical skinheads. Unfortunately, however, many very nice people have been Nazis, Fascists, and Neo-Nazis. This was true in Germany and Italy in the Thirties, and it is still true today.

For one thing, “niceness” alone is no guarantee of goodness. To be nice, to conform to certain standards of propriety and respectability, can be pleasant, but it is an error to confuse superficial propriety with true kindness or virtue. Virtue may require us to behave in ways that are not in accordance with respectability, to defy the oppressor, to go in among the outcast. It may involve breaking unjust laws, and putting the dignity of the person above contrivances of social order.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that anyone is justified in behaving disruptively for any reason, or that social codes can simply be dismissed because one feels too important or is too lazy to defer to them. The iconoclasm of a Donald Trump who sneers at political correctness – political correctness that exists, ideally, to protect the vulnerable from bullies – is on the far end of the pole from the iconoclasm of social justice activists who take risks in challenging unjust systems.

But typically, nihilistic iconoclasts such as Trump draw their cover precisely from the ranks of the “proper.” We see outcries against leftist activists from many who gave a pass to pussy-grabbing, because it is necessary for enablers of fascism to clarify that they are on the side of “law and order” and “propriety.” As the defenders of such, of course, they also get to decide when a breach of courtesy is permitted. “It’s just a fault of style” I heard, from one reluctant Trump supporter.

There’s been a lot of talk about how the immorality, crudeness, and even stupidity of the Trump regime is, for a class of his fans, not a bug but a feature. National Review columnists may lament the unruliness in the White House – and we all say, “look, even these conservatives get it, now.”

But what are they really lamenting? Their issue really is simply with a level of style. Their complaint is, essentially, that all the crassness and in-fighting are preventing their president and his cohorts from effectively cutting our health care, deporting immigrants, and creating tougher laws for cracking down on vulnerable populations.

These respectable ones are, perhaps, cause for greater moral concern than the brash and newsworthy man in a MAGA hat, screaming racial slurs. We all see that he’s bad news. What we don’t see if that the nice ones may be worse news.

Niceness is not goodness. Niceness may even provide cover for evil. As Joseph Brodsky said: What we regard as Evil is capable of a fairly ubiquitous presence if only because it tends to appear in the guise of good.” Think of how many in the American South accepted slavery as a social good, and viewed as renegades those who would upset what they saw as a God-givn order. How quickly people will evoke the “rule of law” as an excuse to condemn refugee children to starvation, and death by drowning.

When Trump says there are “fine folks” on both sides, I am reminded of how easy it is for evil to be normalized. I am reminded of Hannah Arendt and her report on the trial of genocidal Nazi mastermind Adolf Eichmann. The Banality of Evil, she calls it – that evil doesn’t come sweeping in, in a black cloak, masterful as Sauron or Voldemort. It doesn’t have vampire teeth and maintain a witchy lair. All of these things are glamor, glamor borrowed from beauty, whereas evil itself – as Augustine also noted – is a nothingness, an emptiness.

Arendt writes:

“The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together.”

That evil can be decent, polite, and normal is indeed terrifying, which is perhaps why we love our fantasy and superhero stories in which the villains are, once unmasked, given to sinister chuckles and addicted to bizarre fashion. We worry about people being “radicalized” – but Arendt points out that evil is not radical. Extreme, yes, but there is no depth to it. One need not decide to become evil, as does Milton’s sympathetically-portrayed Lucifer. The degeneration into evil happens for the most trivial reasons, in a bourgeois middle-class manner, in nice well-kept neighborhoods.

I have two take-aways from this. One is political. We need to think less about what is respectable and legal, more about what is genuinely true and good. We can’t trust niceness. “He’s a very nice man” is no reason to think someone isn’t politely permitting genocide, or even plotting it. People may tend their lawns, love their pets, and dress their children nicely while supporting intrinsic evil. If they think that their power or prestige are threatened in any way, they may behave dishonorably – for some nebulous “greater good,” and they will do it while posting lovely little quotations on Facebook. And most likely, at some point, they will say ‘I’m praying for you.”

The other is personal. It’s not always just “they.” It’s we. We need always to be on guard against accepting the popular or the normative as the good. I need to be wary of cultivating in myself a series of poses intended to project a goodness I do not have. Standing up for humanity may not win one any awards. It may mean loss of resepctability, of income, even of life. And, unfortunately, defending the innocent probably isn’t going to look epic and glorious, like riding in on dragons. Riding in on dragons comes with a whole other set of temptations, anyway. Evil is always waiting for an inroad, and for those of us who find respectability boring, and have no interest in well-kept lawns, our temptation may be to set ourselves up as heroic or Messianic figures – forgetting the true Savior of the World, who didn’t save us by riding in on a dragon, but by going out on a cross.

Previous Post

August 29, 2017

Why the Pro-Life Movement Needs to Be Rebuilt

Next Post

September 16, 2017 Join us in the Revolution of Tenderness

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Jude urges believers to contend for what?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The crown of righteousness Their inheritance in Christ The faith that was once for all entrusted to God's holy people Justice and mercy

Support this
Column