Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

suspended in her jar

Home
Catholic
“Trump and the conservatives” – a mistake and a misnomer

“Trump and the conservatives” – a mistake and a misnomer

Last updated on: February 8, 2017 at 11:33 am by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

“Trump and the conservatives” – a mistake and a misnomer 2017-02-08T11:33:42-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“There is a growing, ugly and violent war being waged against the Trump administration and conservatives in general.”

So sayeth Life Site News, in an article so bursting with earnest hysteria that it would be probably pointless, and certainly unfair, to address it at all: but I will direct you to it, here, for your daily dose of “this is why we can’t have pro-life things.” Suffice it to say, radical feminists are involved, and Freemasons, and militant Islam (actually a contrivance of Angela Merkel. Because reasons), and of course the ubiquitous George Soros who is now, it seems, responsible even for the election of the Pope (aka Bergoglio). Yes, Pope Francis is also in on this global conspiracy. And only Trump can save us.

“But Trump is hand in glove with global corporate interests…”

“Stop. Don’t try to use reason! Reason is for academic elites. Take a deep breath, hold it, dpin around one hundred times, snort a line of baking soda, and you will see the GNOSIS unfold before you.”

“But what about Jesus…?”

“Shhh….”

Actually, what I want to address here is the phrasing of the opening statement: “the Trump administration and conservatives in general.” I keep seeing this equation of Trump supporters with conservatives, or the assumption that an attack on Trump is an attack on conservatives. But the thing is, Trump is not a conservative. He’s not even wobbling on the edge of being a conservative. The particular Catholic demographic that applauds Trump and follows such publications as LifeSite is not conservative, either. And the Alt Right, that has hitched its hip techno-wagon to Trump’s gilded star, not only isn’t conservative, but openly mocks conservatives, or the things it thinks are conservatives. “Cuckservatives” is the preferred slur.

By the way, I would like to differentiate here between those who reluctantly voted Trump and now shake their heads at his inanity, or try to focus on happier things – and those who devote their every breath to making excuses for him. It’s this second group, I want to emphasize here, that quite definitively is not conservative.

It’s all the more important to make this distinction, as different right-wing reactionary factions begin to coalesce. On one hand we have the anti-Francis Catholics who have chosen Cardinal Burke as their anti-pope presumptive (whether he likes it or not). These Catholics have completely ignored or laughed off the warnings against mainstreaming the racism and anti-semitism of the Alt Right. They have made excuses for Steve Bannon and Milo Yiannopoulis that they would never make for the ordinary garden-variety divorced or gay person – or for their own pontiff, for that matter. On the other hand we have the Alt Right, which is inherently sexist and white-nationalist, and is largely a secular movement, though it makes utilitarian claims on a species of Christianity without Christ.

The irony is that the Alt Right embraces all the most blatant forms of sexual vulgarity which would usually cause the reactionary Catholics to call for their smelling salts – and sexual exploitaition as well – but we now know how even the most hedonistic sexual adventurer can get a pass: speak out against feminism or black rights movements, and you’re golden. You might even make it up the communion line, in spite of that pesky dubia thing.

The coalescence of these two groups is glaringly evident in that Fr. Frank Pavone writes for Breitbart, and that Bannon is making common cause with the Burke contingent. And certain features that distinguish this new alliance sharply from conservatives become all the more evident.

I wrote recently about the fact that Americans tend to use the term “conservative” when they actually mean “right wing liberal.” Here’s a quick checklist of conservative attitudes:

Distrusts utopian schemes, or any universal scheme for human happiness
Views the ordering of society not as the result of a social contract, but as a reflection of a divine order.
Emphasizes not so much rights, but the responsibilities inherent in one’s place in the ordering of society
Tends to embrace diversity via class structure. They may be racist, yes, but the emphasis is class divisions: the racially other can be an equal if in the same caste
This class structure is based on actual social hierarchies, not money
Is patriarchal, but the more deadly elements of sexism are checked in some ways by the “gentlemanly code”
Because everyone has a responsibility within this structure, there is no clear line distinguishing “people” from “governance”
Believes in a regulated market, because all of life must be regulated in accordance with a natural moral order
Believes in conserving and preserving nature, as part of a duty towards creation
Is reluctant to embrace any sudden change
Would really prefer a monarchy, but only if it were traditional: not forcibly and sudddenly imposed. No Oedipus Tyrannos hobbling in to save us from the Sphynx.

I gave Mr. Darcy as an example of the True Conservative, and a friend of mine later suggested that Prince Charles is a good example of a contemporary conservative (it helps to have a title).

The mentality of the new right-wingers who are coming together under Trump is very different, and decidedly not conservative.

Their vision is fundamentally utopian, apocalyptic, and messianic
They have no sense of place in society conferring responsibility, except for when they are scolding the poor
They are essentially middle-class in their attitudes. It has been noted in many contexts that fascism is a middle class phenomenon. Racism fits especially well into bourgeois ressentiment, because those who envy the lords of the land like to have someone to look down on.
They embrace a capitalist ethos, complete with the ridiculous notion of income-based class, the relativism of supply and demand, the faith in the invisible hand, and the rejection of moral checks and balances.
Is patriarchal, sexist, and misogynistic, with none of the gentlemanly restraints on such behavior as boasting about sexually assaulting women, or harassing women online, or mockng women for their looks.
Does not give one hot damn about nature. Unless they’re attempting to make bad natural law arguments.
Is totally about sudden change, violent change, mindless change – change for the sake of change – to the point of nihilism. Probably because the driving force is fear, or reaction.

Of course, this approach not only is not conservative: it is not Christian, either. But it is presenting itself as Christian, within a frighteningly unhinged apocalyptic framework: they truly see themselves as warriors for Christ in a battle for civilization against….well, everyone who isn’t exactly like them. This is a perverse distortion of the Christian Gospel, but perverse distortions of the Gospel have always been beguiling, from the early Church until today.

How do we combat a fundamentally anti-Christian mentality, when it is disguised as Christianity? Here we find a challenge not only intellectual and sociological, but spiritual. Because if we fall into the mistake of waging a “culture war,” we are no longer following Christ.

But that’s a whole other topic.

Previous Post

February 4, 2017

are you a conservative? are you sure?

Next Post

February 8, 2017 the marginalization of the disabled: a pro-life issue

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Melchizedek" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Priest of the Lord King of Righteousness God's Anointed Servant of the Most High

Support this
Column