Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

suspended in her jar

Home
Catholic
I’m pro-life, and that’s why I oppose Trump

I’m pro-life, and that’s why I oppose Trump

Last updated on: January 27, 2017 at 6:35 pm by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

I’m pro-life, and that’s why I oppose Trump 2017-01-27T18:35:56-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s a given that being pro-life means defending the dignity of the unborn. But from a strict ethical and logical perspective, our defense of unborn humans is based on a premise to which we have already assented, as a starting point: that all life has value, and that we are bound in responsibility to safeguard the lives of our fellow-humans because we are all interconnected.

Once you assent to that premise, the question that should arise, in any ethical dilemma, is “how can I best protect life”? That means that whatever problem we face, a solution that involves putting lives – especially human lives – in danger should be the very last on the list. If on the list at all.

So, when we look at the abortion issue, we need to find a solution that involves protecting the life of the unborn – and, also, safeguarding the well-being of the woman.

Last year, when Trump was still running against candidates who actually had a proven record of opposing abortion (though not of defending life), Trump, in his feeble effort to scramble into the pro-life camp, suggested that there should be some sort of punishment for women who have abortions. Once he realized that this wasn’t actually what people wanted him to say, he backtracked and said something else. It’s widely recognized among pro-life activists that we need to give women help and support, not judgment. That’s the principle on which good crisis pregnancy centers are based. That’s the principle driving pro-life, whole-life organizations.

But unfortunately, it’s not a principle shared by everyone who claims to be pro-life. In the past week I had three separate encounters with Catholics defending the idea that women should be punished for abortions. In only one of these cases (the one that took place on my turf) did any Catholics other than myself rise to object to this.

Now, even if you secretly think women should be punished for abortion (and if you think that, I suggest you educate yourelf), saying so sends a really bad message. It sends the message that pro-life advocates are exactly what our opponents have always said: cruel, misogynistic, veangeful. Not actually interested in defense of human life per se. Obsessed with a fetishized view of abortion because it gives them carte blanche to be as horrible as possible (“hey, at least I’m not murdering babies!”).

And this is what support of Trump says, too. And by “says” I mean “writes in big bold tacky letters across the sky.”

Add to that the fact that the Trump regime does not uphold that first premise of being pro-life, that I mentioned above. To quote from Matthew Tyson’s piece on our New Pro Life page:

We agree only on the ideological stance that abortion is wrong. Past that, the platform they represent is horribly and boldly anti-life, as seen in their stances on immigration, workers’ rights, healthcare, torture, war, and the death penalty. Furthermore, we see no evidence that the Trump administration shares our goal of alleviating the social and economic factors that create the demand for abortion in the first place.

I refuse to reject the fundamental principle of support of life, for the sake of the brief orgasm of power that Trump has offered to Christians. I refuse this on principle, but also because practically speaking, even if any short-term anti-abortion laws are put into place, the long term effect of this regime is going to be the antithesis of a culture of life.

Previous Post

January 24, 2017

"save the storks": a pro-life organization to support

Next Post

January 31, 2017 sexist reactions legitimize the women's march

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the main point of the Parable of the Persistent Widow?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Give money generously Pray and don't give up Obey the law Avoid judges

Support this
Column