Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

suspended in her jar

Home
Catholic
pope francis goes medieval on “bloodsucking bosses”

pope francis goes medieval on “bloodsucking bosses”

Last updated on: May 19, 2016 at 1:48 pm by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

pope francis goes medieval on “bloodsucking bosses” 2016-05-19T13:48:56-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In his sermon at mass at the Vatican guesthouse where he resides, on May 19, Pope Francis minced no words in his harsh critique of employers who hire on part-time contracts in order to avoid providing health benefits or retirement.

“Those who do that are true leeches, and they live by spilling the blood of the people who they make slaves of labor,” he said, and went on to state that to “those who use people for work without justice” are “living on the blood of the people.” He even went so far as to call this “mortal sin.”

This may sound extreme to some, but the pope is speaking in continuity of a Christian tradition of moral theology on money and work. We often like like to reconstruct an image of the historical Jesus as kind, gentle, and unjudgmental, but his rhetoric directed at those wealthy who refused to care for the poor was often about hellfire and damnation. While repeatedly, throughout history, lust for wealth and power has driven humans to clever interpretations and evasions, even in the name of God, Christianity as such has always been intimately connected with a preferential option for the poor. It is affirmed in the church fathers, who, while affirming the right to private property within certain parameters, also warned against the peril of riches, and advocated for the needs of the poor as a primary obligation.

Pope Francis sounds a lot like these guys:

You are not making a gift of your possession to the poor person. You are handing over to him what is his.
St. Ambrose

The property of the wealthy holds them in chains . . . which shackle their courage and choke their faith and hamper their judgment and throttle their souls. They think of themselves as owners, whereas it is they rather who are owned: enslaved as they are to their own property, they are not the masters of their money but its slaves.
St. Cyprian

The bread in your cupboard belongs to the hungry man; the coat hanging in your closet belongs to the man who needs it; the shoes rotting in your closet belong to the man who has no shoes; the money which you put into the bank belongs to the poor. You do wrong to everyone you could help but fail to help.
St. Basil

Not to enable the poor to share in our goods is to steal from them and deprive them of life. The goods we possess are not ours but theirs.
St. John Chrysostom

Of course, those who keep alive this tradition have often faced opposition from those who enjoy using religion for their own aggrandizement. St. Francis faced tremendous opposition when initiating his order, and in the generations that followed the “Spiritual Franciscans” who taught the poverty of Christ were not only opposed, but actively threatened by papal powers. This may be one reason why Dante, who had no use for the appropriation of earthly powers by church figures, and who damned usurers to a hell far worse than that where mere adulterers swirled, was eventually drawn to the Franciscan order. Elias Crim writes about this Christian view of usury in “Bankers in Hell”:

“The Thomistic critique of usury, from which Dante borrowed, includes three scholastic arguments which center on the themes of 1) the nature and purpose of money, 2) the relation between labor and a just recompense, and 3) the medieval vision of society as an harmonious whole. Dante’s ire is grounded in all three approaches to the practice.”

So, Pope Francis is speaking like a traditionalist, not like some crazy liberal here.

Actually, liberalism strictly speaking is all about free market individualism, bootstrap economies, and narratives of innovation and success. Those who call themselves conservative Christians, especially those who adopt the ludicrous “prosperity gospel” are actually old liberals in new, shiny disguises. The pope is in line with an older, Medieval, Dantesque tradition, a tradition we might do well to recover, especially as our contemporary American Christianity enjoys fixating on sexual sins (with a special emphasis on female sexuality) while giving the wealthy a pass – or, even, contrary to the gospels, a special place at the banquet. Convenient, isn’t it? The language of mortal sin is strong indeed, when speaking of any wrongdoing in general, because typically a sin can not be said to be mortal unless the matter is grave, and the perpetrator has both full knowledge and full consent. Perhaps the pope is simply being hyperbolic, calling attention to the gravity of the sin of those who profit through the labor stolen from others. Or perhaps he is implying that those who do this know perfectly well what they are up to, and are opting to do it anyway.

Not being a wealthy employer myself, but subsisting barely over the poverty line, I am inclined to rub my hands with glee over this denunciation, but I must check myself. While I would never dream of hiring anyone on my little farm unless I could pay them a just wage, how often do I profit from industries that rely on unjust wages and slave labor? I am complicit in this system, too, and perhaps all of us who enjoy any comfort and safety in the developed world need to ask ourselves how we can make a difference in creating a climate of economic justice.

But if we take Pope Francis seriously, the fact that I am complicit too doesn’t let the wealthy off the hook.

Read more about the pope’s homily here.

Image credit: Parable of the Rich Fool, Rembrandt. PD-US. This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author’s life plus 100 years or less.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_Rich_Fool.

Previous Post

May 18, 2016

archdiocese of chicago gets it right on parental leave, but will others follow?

Next Post

May 21, 2016 is it okay to put your enemies in a book? the strange moral discipline of fiction writing

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Moses" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Drawn Out (of water) Born Amid Trouble Gifted Rescued

Support this
Column