voting with your genitals: part 2

Last updated on: March 3, 2016 at 11:52 pm by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

voting with your genitals: part 2 2016-03-03T23:52:29-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Earlier I discussed gender bias in voting. Yes, it exists, but there’s a latent hypocrisy in the assumption that this is some exclusively female problem, given that for centuries men were so gender biased as to exclude women from the public sphere entirely.

This brings me to my next topic: that hegemonic male gender bias may be less obvious to some because masculine identity is so often elided with human identity. The idea of “man” is connected with the supposedly-gender-neutral-universal MAN, as in mankind. In the public space, “men” are able to present themselves as representative of “man” – some pure and complete entity, uncomplicated by sex. Simone de Beauvois writes in The Second Sex: “A man never begins by presenting himself as an individual of a certain sex; it goes without saying that he is a man” and: “Man is defined as a human being and woman as a female – whenever she behaves as a human being she is said to imitate the male.” She points to Julien Benda’s statement: “the body of a man makes sense in itself quite apart from that of woman, whereas the latter seems wanting in significance by itself. Man can think of himself without woman. She cannot think of herself without man.”

The phallogocentric privilege, then, allows males to shift freely between a specifically masculine claim to power (physical force, the theorized generative power, the power to dictate meaning) and the masculine option of sexual neutrality. The ubiquitous professional suit-and-tie of the man conveys this message: sexual power, but sexual neutrality.

This is borne out in the politics of fashion, in which the reproductive elements of female physique are emphasized either by covering or uncovering. Biology does have a say here, also, because when it comes to maternity versus paternity, motherhood is always rendered physically obvious, from the visible rounded belly of pregnancy to the verifiable exit the child makes from its mother’s body. Paternity remains hidden. This is why “morality clauses” unfairly target women, since an unmarried pregnant woman becomes a visible sign of sexual impurity who must be thrust out of the “pure” Christian community (at which point it ceases to be a Christian community), while men can transgress in relative invisibility.

In American politics at the moment, at least in the Republican field, the emphasis is clearly on sexual power. While Bernie Sanders and John Kasich make decent and responsible use of their male privilege of sexual neutrality, the same can not be said for the three brightest stars of the GOP line-up. In a way, it’s hilarious that women voters would be accused of voting with their vaginas, given that the Republican debate has degenerated into a shouting match over who has the biggest penis (metaphorically usually, but sometimes even literally).

The reason frequently given for Trump’s ascendancy is that our nation wants a “strong leader” (Trump strikes me as fairly weak, actually, but that’s because I have agrarian, not military or corporate ideas of what strength entails). And “strong leader” of course means “strong male leader.” So now the Republican hopefuls compete to prove which one of them will be the strongest man, with the most impressive invasive and explosive powers.

Let’s pause a minute. Is this a morally acceptable idea of strength? As Christians, haven’t we rejected the idols of worldly force and violence? Is it politically irrelevant that God came among us poor, seeking no political office, employing no military might, and allowed himself to be executed shamefully on a cross? What happened to bringing our values into the public sphere?

(Next up: masculinity and militarism)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 3, 2016

voting with your genitals: part 1

Next Post

March 4, 2016 voting with your genitals: part 3

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many people were saved from Sodom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

4 6 5 3

Support this
Column