catholicism and intersectionality

Last updated on: March 25, 2016 at 4:11 pm by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

catholicism and intersectionality 2016-03-25T16:11:53-04:00 Rebecca Bratten Weiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(image credit: pixabay)

There’s been a lot of talk about intersectionality lately, not only in academic circles but in the mainstream corporate and social media. The term, coined by legal professor Kimberlé Crenshaw, refers to the way in which discrimination happens along a number of intersecting lines of power, privilege, and prejudice, and was initially introduced to talk about the particular prejudice directed against black women. The term is popular in identity politics, but has to do with social justice, too, since oppressive narratives and systems reinforce one another and reinforce injustice. Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza’s term “kyriarchy” is relevant here, indicating as it does not the male-female power binary suggested by “patriarchy” but a web of interconnected hegemonies of which male-female is only one.

(Yes, a lot of academic jargon in the above, but this jargon serves a purpose of conveying specific concepts. For those who already practice western philosophy, it’s very heavy with jargon anyway: metaphysics, substance, a priori, transcendentals, heteronomy, etc. And, Catholics, bear in mind that we’ve enshrined Aristotelian jargon in our theology. I’m interested in finding alternative routes for discussing these topics, though I’ll save a conversation about the problems of academic discourse for another post).

Intersectionality may be a relatively new term, but in practice it has been around for quite a while. From early on in the feminist movement in western cultures, there has been a tendency for the movement to be dominated by white middle-class women, often to the exclusion of the poor or the racially other. A perfect example of this is Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own. Woolf’s contrast of the opulent meal at the men’s college with the dingy one at the woman’s college is relevant, but focused exclusively on a well-off middle-class culture, as though England weren’t teeming with working women for whom the woman’s college dining experience would have been a luxury. The negative reaction of many white feminists to Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech, in 1851, shows just how exclusive the movement was.

The images and rhetoric associated with female empowerment also subtly reinforce certain kyriarchical structures of ableism and beauty politics, and even of militarist masculinity. The “strong female character” is invariably attractive, in excellent condition, and a badass fighter. Kudos to George R.R. Martin for showing the limitations of the hot warrior princess myth, for showing the female warrior as a subject, not a fetishized object. Female empowerment also draws on a negative version of sex-positivity according to which the sexually active woman is necessarily happier, more fulfilled, and more in tune with nature than the virgin or celibate or asexual. Sexual female empowerment necessarily favors the young, the healthy, the thin, and those whose curves are in the “right places.”

Intersectionality involves recognizing that there are many different types of prejudice, that not all systems of oppression are the same, though some follow similar patterns. It means accepting a polyphony of narratives instead of placing them in competition with one another. It is entirely possible to support the goals of Black Lives Matter, and to see deep entrenchment of white supremacy prejudice, while at the same time recognizing that poor rural whites are subjected to bigotry and structural oppression of a different kind. It means that, in our efforts to advance women’s rights, we don’t do so at the expense of any other marginalized group (the disabled the old, the poor, the unborn).

This ought to be exactly the direction that Catholic thought on social issues should take. If we truly are the universal church we can’t confine ourselves to promoting the ends of any one cultural group. Catholicism should never be appropriated to enforce the ends simply of American culture, or western culture, or masculine culture, if these ends involve the exclusion of others. For this reason Catholic rhetoric about virtue should avoid conventional images promoting ideals of gender identity particular to one culture. Why, for instance, does the “modesty” campaign only present pictures of young, pretty, thin, happy, healthy white girls in vaguely 1950s dress? Are black women necessarily immodest? Are older women irrelevant simply because we’ve passed our expiration date? Are depressed women of less value since they’re not radiating limpid joy from every perfect pore? Do indigenous women have to ape their imperial colonizers in order to present proper Christian virtue? Even the idea of “being a lady” perpetuates white privilege, since in Western culture ladyhood has always been associated with coming from the right family, and being the right race. Is our concept of “family values” based too much on a specific ideal of white western family and white western family roles? Have we idolized private property (of well-off people) so that we value it more than we do lives (of poor people)?

These are only a few ways that intersectional thought can help to enliven our sense of catholicity, and correct the ways in which we might be subjugating our faith to power politics. I’m sure you can think of other ways, especially if you come from a background different from mine, and have a different story to tell.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 7, 2016

of politics and friendship: or, surviving an election year without hating absolutely everyone

Next Post

March 9, 2016 the subjectivist ethics of "refusing to be a victim"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion anti-semitism art Atwood Betrothed church clergy abuse coronavirus culture economics education environmentalism ethics faith family feminism gardening gun violence immigration Judaism literature MaddAddam New Pro Life Movement news pandemic personalism poem politics politics blue Pope Francis racism religion salvation sexuality social justice spirituality Station eleven Stephen King The Stand Trump Uncategorized war World Health Organization

Select a Month March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

James compares faith without works to what?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A lamp without oil A body without spirit (dead) A house without foundation A tree without fruit

Support this
Column