Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Susan Wright on the Right

Supreme Court Delivers Another Win for Faith-Based Pregnancy Centers

Last updated on: June 26, 2018 at 3:30 pm   by Susan Wright

Supreme Court Delivers Another Win for Faith-Based Pregnancy Centers 2018-06-26T15:30:19-04:00 Susan Wright

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s just like California to attempt to impose unfair restrictions and impose unconstitutional requirements on agencies that fall outside of the majority of the state’s liberal worldview.

In an attempt to bully those who value the life of the preborn, the state passed the Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care and Transparency Act, or FACT Act. The purpose of the act was to force pro-life pregnancy centers to act against not only their beliefs, but their stated purpose, by providing information to their clients on where to obtain abortions and low-cost contraception.

It was the equivalent of requiring vegan restaurants to post directions to the best steakhouse in the area.

In a ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States pretty much laid the smack down on that bit of governmental overreach.

The 5-4 ruling, determined that the FACT Act violated the First Amendment protections of licensed facilities, and for those unlicensed facilities, burdened protected speech.

Win!

“No one should be forced by the government to express a message that violates their convictions, especially on deeply divisive subjects such as abortion,” said Alliance Defending Freedom President, CEO, and General Counsel Michael Farris, who argued on behalf of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates before the Supreme Court in March.

“In this case, the government used its power to force pro-life pregnancy centers to provide free advertising for abortion. The Supreme Court said that the government can’t do that, and that it must respect pro-life beliefs.”

Indeed.

How likely is it that a Planned Parenthood facility would be willing to post a picture of a new mother cradling her newborn, with the words, “All life is precious” and ads for the nearest pro-life pregnancy center or adoption agency?

Not very likely, and somehow, these ghouls really do believe that murder of the preborn, while ending any chance at another option is the same thing as “choice.”

You have to wonder why it’s the pro-life, Christian points of view that are considered controversial and in need of being regulated into silence?

The five who voted in the majority on this decision were Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, and Clarence Thomas, who delivered the opinion of the court.

The usual suspects were in the minority: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Stephen Breyer, who filed the dissenting opinion.

The law applies to any facilities in California that provide family planning and pregnancy-related services, such as ultrasounds and pregnancy tests.

Unlicensed facilities, meanwhile, are required to post disclaimers on site and in print and digital ads that they are not a licensed medical provider. Those disclaimers must be posted both in English and in the county’s primary languages.

California argues it is allowed under the First Amendment to regulate the practice-related speech of licensed professionals and that the law is needed to ensure women aren’t being misled about the type of care provided.

They’re called “pregnancy centers,” not “end pregnancy centers.” How often is it that a pregnant woman wanders into one of these facilities looking for an abortion? It would seem California either underestimates the intellect of their women, or they’re being disingenuous.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said of the ruling:

“When it comes to making their health decisions, all California women – regardless of their economic background or zip code – deserve access to critical and non-biased information to make their own informed decisions,” he said in a statement.

Awesome, so maybe put those ads for the pro-life centers up in all your Planned Parenthood facilities and give some desperate women a little glimmer of hope.

I won’t hold my breath.

 

 

Uncategorized

California

Pro-life

SCOTUS

Previous Post



June 26, 2018

Trump Turns His Destructive Ire on an American Icon (Why Aren't ALL Conservatives Concerned?)

Next Post



June 27, 2018 Communists Officials in China Harassing, Arresting Christians on a Regular Basis


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did Jacob and his family settle in Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Memphis Cairo Goshen Thebes

Related posts from Susan Wright on the Right

Politics Red

For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise

Susan Wright on the Right

Politics Red

Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD

Susan Wright on the Right

Politics Red

Pat McCrory Returns

Susan Wright on the Right

Politics Red

Let's Revisit the Steele Dossier

Susan Wright on the Right

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Christians should care about politics. Here are 4...

How can Christians best engage with politics in a way that shows...

For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise

For pro-life conservatives, it’s like a dream come true. For pro-choice feminazis...

Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD

The apology was warranted. The follow-up is essential. A week ago, the...

From a Conservative to Conservatives on President Trump...

I am a conservative, a Republican, and an evangelical Christian, and I...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube