BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Susan Wright on the Right
- Home
- Politics and Religion
- Trump’s National Guard Plan for the Border Deemed “a Waste”
Trump’s National Guard Plan for the Border Deemed “a Waste”
Last updated on: May 26, 2018 at 10:31 am by Susan Wright
Trump’s National Guard Plan for the Border Deemed “a Waste” 2018-05-26T10:31:27-04:00 Susan Wright
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Well, this is going to be uncomfortable for some Trump loyalists, but under the circumstances, I’d say this deserves a listen.
A month ago, President Trump made a decision to send over 1,000 National Guard troops to our nation’s southern border, in order to give assistance to U.S. Border Patrol agents, as they work to stymie the flow of illegal immigration.
At the time of this announcement, I was pleased. It was a step in the right direction, although, I’ve maintained that there was more to be done, if President Trump and his administration are truly sincere about their desire to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.
Let’s face it. A lot of presidents have verbally addressed the issue at the border, but few have made any real moves to do anything to improve the situation.
And no, I’ve never been in favor of Trump’s magical border wall, which would be paid for, somehow, by the Mexican government.
I knew that was a crock of nonsense from the first moment Reverend Donnie of the Trump’s Temple passed it out as spiked punch to the maniacs in his flock.
Our Energy Secretary Rick Perry, former governor of the state of Texas, had a solid border control plan, and had the Republican voters been so wise as to back his run at the presidency, I’m pretty certain we’d be well on our way to a more secure border, with a lot less legal and political chaos.
Perry proposed putting more boots on the ground at the border, strategic fencing, and aviation assets to communicate with rapid responders on the ground.
Seriously. How difficult could it be to toss a few drones over the border with an eye on the ground?
That being said, I felt like getting our border agents some backup, by way of National Guard troops was a good start, and one of those few times where I could find myself in agreement with this administration.
Well, it hasn’t really been a winning strategy, according to the head of the national Border Patrol union. In fact, he’s calling it a “colossal waste of resources.”
Ouch.
“We have seen no benefit,” said Brandon Judd, president of the union that represents 15,000 agents, the National Border Patrol Council.
“When I found out the National Guard was going to be on the border I was extremely excited,” Judd said, because previous deployments on the border helped alleviate the Border Patrol’s workload.
But this time, he said, “that has not happened at all.”
Apparently, there are some issues.
I have to note here that the Border Patrol union endorsed Trump during the election and viewed his attitude towards border security favorably.
He was their guy, but this just isn’t working out.
There were around 1,600 troops sent to the border, originally, with another 750 scheduled to join them in support roles. Depending on need, the number could reach a total of 4,000, according to Army Lt. Col. Jamie Davis, a Pentagon spokesman.
So what, exactly, are these National Guard troops doing at the border?
A Border Patrol spokeswoman said National Guard troops had assisted with 3,924 deportations, 1,116 “turn backs” of migrants into Mexico and the seizure of 3,486 pounds of marijuana — all by operating support technology and equipment. She said they had replaced some Border Patrol agents at observation posts. “Instead of an agent watching a camera, they can,” she said.
Border Patrol Acting Chief Carla Provost responded to the union’s claims by acknowledging that the National Guard’s role has changed compared with past deployments. Although they have been deployed to the border, they have to be paired with an agent who has law enforcement powers, and Border Patrol and defense officials decided it was better to use them behind the scenes for surveillance and air support.
“I want my agents out on the front line enforcing the laws,” Provost said Thursday during a visit to the agency’s Rio Grande Valley headquarters.
One official with the Pentagon has suggested that the National Guard presence, as it was with George W. Bush, Obama, and now Trump hasn’t changed, significantly. Only the perception of their presence has changed.
So why the disconnect between what the paper-pushers are saying and what the union boss is saying? How do those with the boots actually on the ground see it?
The last time the National Guard was deployed to the border — in Texas in 2014 and borderwide in 2010 — troops assumed Border Patrol posts on the front lines, easing the workload, Judd said. Although National Guard members were restricted to an “observe and report” role and couldn’t detain migrants, they still aided patrols.
“They were allowed to do a lot more than they are under the Trump administration. They were allowed to be in lookout and observation posts. They were allowed to be out grading the roads and mending fences. They were allowed to be our eyes and ears, freeing us up,” Judd said.
“Limited” is the word being used to describe the current deployment of National Guard troops to the border, and what they’re allowed to do just isn’t the kind of help they feel they need.
“We generally support the administration, but we’re not going to be cheerleading when things are not going well,” Judd said.
Some of the complaints are that troops are stationed too far away from the border. Unfenced areas of the Rio Grande, a hot spot for drug smuggling, remains unguarded. Instead of policing those areas, troops are fixing roads and fences – something agents see as “busy work.”
“It’s not saving any manpower yet,” an agent wrote, and other than the air support, he said the deployment has “been a waste.”
“You would think that they could put some of those guard members in some of the control points to allow the agents [to] actually go out and work the field but that has not been done,” another agent wrote.
A third agent said: “They aren’t out in the field like last time, doing the observation points. So if the goal was to get more agents out to the line, they have fallen short.”
And a lot of money is being paid to keep those troops at a border doing, essentially, nothing of value.
The expected price tag, running through the end of the year is somewhere around $220 million to $252 million, according to a Department of Defense spokesman, Christopher Sherwood.
That includes $204 million to $221 million in pay and support costs for 3,143 troops and $16 million to $31 million for 12,000 flying hours by 26 UH-72 Lakota helicopters, Sherwood said.
Paying the tab for this was always going to be uncomfortable, but it would be made more bearable, if only it were effective.
Maybe doing things for reasons other than show and allowing those who are actually on the ground, rather than bureaucrats in an office, many miles away from the problem should be the first line of planning for this sort of operation.
Next Post

May 26, 2018 Connecticut Lawmakers Give Transgender Inmates a Win
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Uncategorized
Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
How many people boarded the ark with Noah?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Ten Two Twelve Eight
Related posts from Susan Wright on the Right
For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise
Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD
Let's Revisit the Steele Dossier
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion
Christians should care about politics. Here are 4...
How can Christians best engage with politics in a way that shows...
For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise
For pro-life conservatives, it’s like a dream come true. For pro-choice feminazis...
Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD
The apology was warranted. The follow-up is essential. A week ago, the...
From a Conservative to Conservatives on President Trump...
I am a conservative, a Republican, and an evangelical Christian, and I...
view all Politics and Religion blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In









