Jumpstarting Grown-Up Wonder in Tarsem Singh’s “The Fall”

Last updated on: January 6, 2015 at 6:18 pm by Joseph Susanka

Jumpstarting Grown-Up Wonder in Tarsem Singh’s “The Fall” 2015-01-06T18:18:23-07:00 Joseph Susanka

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Fall, a genre-defying film from the Indian-born director Tarsem Singh, perfectly encapsulates the occasionally awkward marriage between Hollywood’s independent filmmakers and their commercial counterparts. Tarsem, probably best known for his visually arresting music video to R.E.M.’s “Losing My Religion,” has produced a mind-bending, one-of-a-kind work one could accurately describe as both a vanity project and a labor of love. The film, which took more than four years to shoot and features more than twenty-eight extraordinary locations from around the globe, was primarily self-financed. After viewing, one can well understand the reluctance of studios to take on such a unique (and unmarketable) work.

The story: Roy Walker (Lee Pace) is a 1920s-era movie stuntman confined to his hospital bed following a stunt gone wrong. Eager for company, Roy begins to spin a tale of love and adventure worthy of Scheherazade in an effort to befriend another hospital resident, a young foreigner, Alexandria (Catinca Untaru), who recently broke her arm falling from a fruit tree. As he recounts his exciting story, Alexandria provides the imagery to accompany his words, and the two grow closer through their shared vision of fantasy.

Gradually, Roy’s ulterior motives come into focus. Distraught more over the loss of his girlfriend to a studio leading man than over his injury, he seeks to exploit Alexandria’s new-found trust to procure enough morphine to end his life. As he struggles to manipulate her young devotion while maintaining enough emotional distance to justify his scheme, the line between reality and the world of their shared imaginings grows increasingly blurred. A catastrophic accident, brought about through his selfishness, forces Roy to confront both his own desire for death and the profound way it will affect those around him.

The film’s story is a bit underdeveloped, reflecting the struggles ad/video directors often experience when working within the traditional cinematic medium. They nearly always bring with them an incredibly strong visual sense and the carefully-honed ability to convey a large amount of information in a very short period of time. At times, however, these crossover directors seem to be caught up in an endless loop of 30-second concepts. They become held back by their own gift for economic cinematic phrasing, and by their instincts to convey messages via their visual vocabulary.

When The Fall was released in mid-2008, it was precisely this story-weakness that raised the ire of many film critics. But the film’s visuals are so overpowering, so extraordinary, and so intoxicating that these shortcomings seem almost inconsequential. The images are breathtaking (sometimes even otherworldly), causing one to doubt the film’s claim that no computer-generated imagery was used in its creation. The spectacle alone might well make the film worth watching; in the words of critic Roger Ebert, Tarsem “has made a movie that you might want to see for no other reason than because it exists. There will never be another like it.”

But perhaps the criticisms directed at the film’s weaknesses are misplaced; perhaps the elevation of visuals and spectacle to such extraordinary heights—even at the expense of story—is part of the very message Tarsem is trying to communicate. In fact, maybe it is the entire point.

In his Hollywood debut, The Cell, Tarsem explored the terrifying mind of a serial killer with the same unusual visual flair he brings to The Fall, but that film felt like little more than an in-depth (and unnecessary) exercise in depravity. Here, he is once again taking us on a journey inside the human mind, only this exploration is both more fruitful and more profound—the simplicity and fantastical nature of Alexandria’s imaginings giving us an important insight into an oft-overlooked difference between the vision of a child and that of an adult.

The imagined worlds of young children are, in many ways, more spectacular because of their lack of experience rather than in spite of it. There is a reason we often describe wonder as “childlike,” and it is a mistake for us adults, grown wise in the ways of the world, to equate experience with depth. Age and experience seems to muddle and dim, rather than enlarge and clarify our imaginings. Cynicism, rationalization, excessive literalness (and an accompanying lack of vibrancy and excitement) are far more likely to afflict us as we grow older than is an excessive sense of wonderment and child-like joy.

To embrace maturity at the expense of wonder would be a terrible mistake, yet it is a mistake that modern society makes with regularity. Our adult instinct is to reject the fantastical and wonder-filled for more “grounded” pursuits, but the Socratic suggestion that wisdom ushers in wonder should give us pause. As Chesterton reminds us, “The world will never starve for want of wonders, but only for want of wonder.” And it is that warning that lies at the heart of The Fall.

Alexandria is struggling to save Roy, though not through the medical means he desires or expects. She is saving him by giving back to him that which he has lost so many years before, allowing him to rethink, re-envision, and rekindle his own dreams through the clear, wondering eyes of a child.

Christ’s remonstration that we become like little children for the sake of our salvation speaks to the trust and confidence we should have in Him, and on how completely and innocently we are to rely on His Divine Providence. But perhaps it is also a gentle reminder to recognize (and savor) the wonderful, fantastical world in which He has placed us.

We could all do with a little more wonder.Attribution(s): Movie poster, publicity images, and movie stills are the property of Roadside Attractions and other respective production studios and distributors, and are intended for editorial use only.

Movies

Through a Lens, Darkly

Previous Post

January 14, 2011

Capes, Masks, and Ordinary Heroes

Next Post

January 28, 2011 To Be Pickering in a Henry Higgins World

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Baseball Faith Family Lenten Music Movies Music No Commentary Necessary Parked By the Jukebox Photography Politics Quodlibets Streaming Video Suggestions Summa Short Films Television The Man Behind the Booth Through a Lens, Darkly

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 July 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 November 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz