Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

summacatholic

Are Human Beings Good?

Last updated on: September 8, 2023 at 1:10 am   by David Schloss

0 Comments

Are Human Beings Good? 2023-09-08T01:10:32-04:00 David Schloss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image by Kalhh.

“The world is a fine place and worth fighting for.” – Ernest Hemmingway. 

Are people innately or naturally good? The answer to that question has implications beyond one’s own worldview (although that is also important). The goodness or lack thereof of human beings affects interpersonal relationships, philosophical anthropology, government, and theology.

So as to properly examine the issue, it is necessary to define what it means for someone to be “good.” Since the question of whether people are naturally good can only be addressed in general (and not whether a particular individual is good), the question of human goodness relates to human nature. Therefore, having a working definition of human nature is also beneficial. 

While the definition of human nature can vary, it generally refers to those traits and characteristics that are true of all human beings across space and time. Furthermore, human nature entails the essence or quiddity of a person. That is to say that nature is the foundation for what a thing is. From the perspective of Catholicism, the definition of human nature must include a rational soul made in the image of God. It is essential to clarify that Catholicism asserts that essence or nature precedes existence. That is to say that it is God who constitutes human nature. While this may seem almost self-evident to people of faith, it is not settled. 

Modernity (i.e., secularism) takes a dim view of the concept of a human nature. Several reasons for this skepticism exist, but essentially the modern mind denies an extrinsic teleology or a purpose to life. Since the nature of a thing includes its purpose, human nature is often gainsaid. Nevertheless, it suffices to say that human nature encompasses rationality, speech, and sociability. All of this goes to what it means to be human. But what does it mean to be “good.” 

From the perspective of philosophy, something is good if it is desired. Such a definition is essentially ontological. Something is good because it exists, and it exists because it is desired. This claim requires an explanation. First, we must distinguish between an ultimate cause and proximate causes. Catholicism asserts that the ultimate cause is God. Proximate causes are events that are the immediate cause of a thing. The proximate cause of a child is its parents. The ultimate cause of the child (and the parents and everything else) is God. 

Now, nothing can cause itself to come into existence. Therefore, everything that does not exist necessarily requires an extrinsic cause for its existence. What is ultimately caused is willed by the one that caused it, and what is willed for is desired. Since God has willed the universe into existence, it must be that God desired everything that exists to be. This is what is meant when God looked at everything he had made and found it very good. (Genesis 1:31).

Before continuing, it seems necessary to address an obvious problem with the claim that something is good because it exists. Evil – in its various forms – exists. Is evil “good”? The answer is that evil as a subsistent substance does not actually exist. Properly defined, evil is a privation of what ought to be. For example, blindness is the lack of what should exist, viz, sight. 

In addition to the ontological “good,” it is possible to categorize “good” as subjective and objective. A subjective “good” is only relative to the individual who perceives it. Therefore, the concept of a subjective good is conditioned by the individual’s emotions, opinions, and experiences. The individual(s) (i.e., the subject) determines whether a thing is good or not. In opposition to the subjective is the objective. Something can be considered objectively good if its “goodness” is independent of anyone’s conceptions of it. 

Having thus far sought to explain human nature and the concepts undergirding what “good” is, I address the question that spawned this paper. Are human beings good? Or, rather, are humans objectively good?  

“No one is good but God alone.” (Mark 10:18). These words, spoken by Christ Himself, seem to suggest that humans are not innately good. Yet the claim that only God is good seems to contradict what God said of His creation (See Genesis 1:31). 

How do we reconcile this apparent contradiction? First, by reiterating that something is good if it is desired. Moreover, a thing is desired to the extent that it actualizes or fulfills its nature. If God has created human nature, then God desired the existence of human nature, which means that human nature is good to the extent that it is fulfilled. That leads to the question of how human nature is fulfilled. Thomas Aquinas provides the answer. “Grace perfects nature.” It was that Grace that was partially lost at the Fall. I say partially because if God had entirely withdrawn His Grace, human beings would cease to exist. Still, this partial loss of Grace means that human nature is corrupted and, therefore, cannot be perfected by its own power. That is to say that we cannot, of our own accord, repair the damage done to our nature. Since we did not create our nature, it cannot be repaired and thereby perfected by us. If that conclusion is correct, then human beings cannot achieve a state of being good by their own efforts.

If human goodness necessitates the perfection of our nature, and we cannot achieve that state, it must be that human beings are good only to the extent that they are reconciled with the One who can perfect our nature: God. Fortunately, this reconciliation has been made possible by the Incarnation, death, and Resurrection of Christ.

If what has been said is true, human beings, in their fallen state, cannot be said to be “good.” Only by being “grafted” onto Christ – in and through the sacramental life of the Church – can our nature be perfected, and we may be considered good.

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Catholicism.

Catholic Church

Ethics

Good

Human Nature

Previous Post



August 27, 2023

Do We Really Want God?

Next Post



September 10, 2023 The Transfiguration; Significance and Meaning

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Why would it matter if atheism is wrong? The fact that Catholic and Protestant scholars ..."

Tom


Beyond the Absence of Belief: The ..."

"Kaiser Member Service Proponents often compare atheism to not collecting stamps—it is the lack of ..."

helen


Beyond the Absence of Belief: The ..."

""these dual denials (objective truth and objective meaning)"This is not accurate. Post-modern thought does not ..."

alwayspuzzled


Defending the Faith in a Post-Truth ..."

"The theologians still haven't received the memo. Your opposition are no longer atheists, but they ..."

EarthGrowl


Defending the Faith in a Post-Truth ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Atheism Catholicism. Catholicism. God. Theophany. Christmas Eschatology Faith and Works. God. Holy Spirit Intelligent Design Jesus Christ Justice Law Politics Protestantism Religion Sabbath Salvation. Soteriology. The Bible Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How long did Persian empire rule?

Select your answer to see how you score.

150 years 200 years 180 years 250 years

Related posts from Summa Catholic

Catholic

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

Summa Catholic

Catholic

Beyond the Absence of Belief: The Implications of...

Summa Catholic

Catholic

Can Catholic Apologetics Survive a Postmodern World?

Summa Catholic

Catholic

From Samaria to Sanctity: Analyzing The Woman At...

Summa Catholic

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube