Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Summa

What Friedrich Nietzsche Can Tell Us About Heaven

Last updated on: December 26, 2012 at 1:59 pm   by Summa Dan

What Friedrich Nietzsche Can Tell Us About Heaven 2012-12-26T13:59:47-08:00 Summa Dan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Nineteenth Century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is renowned by atheists everywhere for his (usually taken out of context) axiom of the era, “God is dead.”  This misuse of this quote can perhaps in some way shed light on what I mean when I say that we have anything to learn about Heaven, the place where we live with God for eternity, from the man who said that “God is dead.”  When Nietzsche proclaims that “God is dead,” he does not do so in the way that the quote out of context may make it seem, that is to say, it does not make a dogmatic declaration on the state of affairs in reality.  Instead a statement on the ontological situation of a deity, this quote;

God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. Yet his shadow still looms. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it? –The Gay Science, Section 125

is a condemnation, and an imperative.  It should be noted that this is bizarre imperative, for it is one that is at the same moment a universal, and a completely individual imperative to take absolute responsibility for your actions and really understand what you’re doing in your life.

With this understanding of the mustachioed madman of the Alps in mind, we move on to his concept of the “Eternal Return.”  The concept that history would repeat itself is not a new one, by any stretch, but this is not the totality of Nietzsche’s claim.  As J. P. Stern reflects on this daunting topic, by anyone’s standards, he reveals something of very importance; that the Eternal Return, much like the death of God, is not simply a statement the ontological status of something, but an imperative, a dictate for judging actions.

It would make sense that the man who attempted to start a quasi-religious movement entitled “The Re-valuation of all Values” would have a vested interest in a dictate for action.  But what does the fact that stuff happens and will continue to happen, in much the same way, have to do with moral dictates?  Well, first of all, it should be noted that this is in no way a moral dictate, instead it is an amoral dictate of action, that is to say, not a question of what you should or shouldn’t do, but a dictate that you should consider what you’re doing.  This would seem simple enough, until one considers the totality of the Eternal Return.  For Nietzsche’s description of it, decisions made with a consciousness of the Eternal Return are ones made with a knowledge that they will have to be repeated, not just once or twice, but ad infinitum, that is forever.   Now, this does not mean that every time I eat a bowl of cereal I have to do it with full understanding that by doing this I will forever be condemned to eating cereal; rather it means that whenever I do something that may, in retrospect, be said to define me, I must be, in order to be truly myself, willing to do it ad infinitum.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-Q7b-vHY3Q

But, what does this have to do with Heaven?  Allow me an anecdote to explain.

Byzantine liturgies are notoriously long.  A visitor once approached a priest after Divine Liturgy and asked him, “Father, I love your church, but the Liturgy was so long.  I don’t know if I could belong to a Byzantine parish.”  To which he quickly responded “Well, then you ought to go to Hell, because you aren’t going to enjoy Heaven all that much.”  Understandably she was shocked.  But let us consider Nietzsche’s Eternal Return.  It’s easy to say “I want to go to Heaven” when one believes that the only other option is to go to Hell (eternal misery or eternal happiness?  All too similar to “cake or death” (thanks Church of England)).  I believe that there are only these two options, but people all too often forget what it means to accept the option that seems so simple, of course you want cake… Heaven, but one truly has to consider, in the actions of life, if that’s really what one wants.

Eternity is the absolute of Eternal Return.  Heaven is a constant prayer and much as the Eternal Return is the continuation of a man’s action of prayer ad infinitum, Christianity, which is centered on this Kingdom of God, is the continuation of prayer.  St. Paul directs us to “pray constantly and without ceasing,” and if we truly want Heaven, then this is all we can do.  We cannot simply go to Mass on Sundays begrudgingly, and we can’t just live as if there was no God and expect a reward for our “good enough” behavior.  If we truly want Heaven, then we must direct ourselves to it, with the knowledge that it will be our eternity.

Atheism

Catholicism

Death

Philosophy

Previous Post



December 18, 2012

A Case for Camus

Next Post



December 26, 2012 Kierkegaard, Chrysostom and Christmas Boredom


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Atheism Catholicism Christmas Death Despair Femininity Icons Introductions Judaism Manhood Masturbation Moral Relativism Nature Orthodoxy Paganism Pascha Philosophy Planned Parenthood Protestantism Reformation Resurrection Scripture Secularization Society Spiritualism Spring Superpowers Tradition Uncategorized Women's Health

Select a Month December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What foreign power destroyed Jerusalem, ending the kingdom of Judah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Egypt Persia Assyria Babylon

Related posts from Summa

Catholic

“I AM” is not “Is”: Nihilism

Summa

Catholic

A Christian Rite for Same-Sex Union

Summa

Catholic

Saved from Sin or From God

Summa

Catholic

Why Sola Scriptura Honestly Scares Me

Summa

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Desert Fathers And Mothers On Anger And Community

The desert fathers and mothers often reminded each other against the dangers...

Religious Liberty For All, Not Just Christians

As a strong defender and promoter of religious liberty, I have consistently...

Is Faith Really Blind? What Skeptics Get Wrong

Faith is belief without evidence and reason. So saith the famous (infamous?)...

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube