Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
On the Death Penalty, and the Consistent Life Ethic

On the Death Penalty, and the Consistent Life Ethic

Last updated on: May 4, 2026 at 12:10 am by Mary Pezzulo

0 Comments

On the Death Penalty, and the Consistent Life Ethic 2026-05-04T00:10:25-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

a sandstone plaque with "DEAD" etched into it.

image via Pixabay

The discourse is on the death penalty again.

My veteran readers know that I am against the death penalty because I’m a Catholic who tries to hold a consistent life ethic. That’s what Catholics are supposed to do, and I’m doing my best. So I wasn’t at all surprised when Pope Leo XIV reiterated what we already knew last Tuesday: “The Catholic Church has consistently taught that each human life, from the moment of conception until natural death, is sacred and deserves to be protected. Indeed, the right to life is the very foundation of every other human right… the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.”

There are no surprises in that statement. Pope Leo is reiterating what Pope Francis already stated, which is an understandable evolution of our doctrine about the sanctity of life. And for those of you who don’t remember how doctrine works, I’ll repeat what I said when discussing just war theory recently: doctrine is a thing that evolves. That means that we’re constantly refining and evolving the way we express a truth and apply it to what we learn about the world around us. The truths of our faith and the things God expects of us don’t actually change; we change when we realize we’ve been expressing the truth or acting in accordance with it in the wrong way. For awhile, the Church did execute people and permit secular governments to do the same. Now, we’ve evolved our doctrine on that point to better respect the sanctity of human life. We know we ought to respect the sanctity of life, and we’re now articulating a way we can do it better. Something that used to be considered permissible sometimes, is now forbidden. That’s not a contradiction to what we used to believe. It’s an evolution of doctrine. Direct killing is always wrong, and now we accept that the death penalty is direct killing.

Of course, the pope’s unsurprising statement led to all kinds of commentary on the internet. Many people were pleased. Some were confused. And a handful were downright angry. It’s those angry people I can’t understand.

I can’t wrap my brain around people who get ANGRY when the Church declares the death penalty inadmissible.

It’s not that the death penalty isn’t something that should inspire strong emotions, of course. I completely understand the people who are angry that the death penalty exists and are doing everything they can to stop it. I share that position. I think the thought of human beings deliberately killed ought to make you sick. I can also understand the people who say that, regrettably, there are times when we simply must execute a dangerous convicted criminal for the good of society, but killing in itself is never in itself a GOOD thing. That’s an ethical position which I do not share, and it’s not the Church’s position at this point in history, but I see where they’re coming from.

But I can’t understand people who get offended and upset when told the death penalty is inadmissible.

The people who get so angry are not, themselves, executioners. I’ve never met one who was the family member of a murder victim with the perpetrator on death row either (though I’m sure those exist). The people who get so angry are not, in any way, affected by whether there’s a death penalty or not. If every single prisoner on death row had their sentence commuted today, it would not change their day to day life at all. They don’t have a personal stake in this issue. And yet they’re angry. They are angry that somebody they don’t know, has been deprived of being allowed to inject lethal chemicals, break the neck, or shoot bullets into somebody else they don’t know.

Why?

If you care about other people in a normal way, you’ll probably say that nobody should ever be executed, or you might say there’s an exception and a reason why a handful of people must be killed for the greater good. We can have a debate about that because we’re both arguing with the same goal in mind: the good of human beings. If you don’t care about other people at all, you might say that you don’t mind if somebody you’ve never met dies in a building you’ve never been to before, as long as it doesn’t inconvenience you personally. I can’t really argue with you about that, because we have such drastically different worldviews, but I can see where you’re coming from. But if a person gets angry and offended because someone who has no bearing on their life whatsoever ISN’T going to be strapped to a gurney and killed, I don’t even know what to say about that. It’s not just that it’s evil. It also makes no sense.

It makes even less sense that these vehemently pro-death-penalty Catholics invariably identify as pro-life.

I’m not saying they shouldn’t be. I’m also against abortion. Remember, I’m talking about a consistent life ethic here. But bear with me. These people stridently insist that every pregnant woman has to carry that baby to term, even if they have hyperemesis gravardium and can’t get out of bed for months, or if they’re fleeing a violent man who might try to control them by getting custody of the baby, or if they’re so young they’re not a woman at all but only a girl whose body might not be able to give birth properly. There’s no exception to that. When it comes to a woman or girl with a baby inside of her, they believe that that person must do everything she possibly can to keep the baby alive or she’s in mortal sin. If I didn’t know any other position these people held, I’d assume that their ethical belief was that every human being must do everything they can to safeguard the life of every other human being, no matter how much it hurts or what we risk, or else we’re in mortal sin. In that case, they ought to be against the death penalty. But they’re not only not against it, they’re adamant that it ought to happen.

How do they reconcile those two beliefs?

They expect a woman, or sometimes a girl, to go through all of that suffering to keep a person alive. But they are angry at the thought of another person who costs them nothing and isn’t bothering them NOT getting killed.

Why?

Do they just really like the thought of other people suffering?

Is it not LIFE they care about, but rather being as harsh and demanding to as many people as they can?

That’s the only conclusion I can come to, and it makes me sick.

Mary Pezzulo is the author of Meditations on the Way of the Cross, The Sorrows an d Joys of Mary, and Stumbling into Grace: How We Meet God in Tiny Works of Mercy.

Steel Magnificat operates almost entirely on tips. To tip the author, donate to “The Little Portion” on paypal or Mary Pezzulo on venmo

American Christianity

death

abortion

consistent life ethic

death penalty

Pope Leo XIV

Previous Post

April 30, 2026

Where Grace Abounds the More

Next Post

May 8, 2026 The End of the World, and Queen Anne's Lace

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"You're talking about supercessionism, the idea that Christians "replace" the covenant that the Jewish people ..."

Alex

Yes, the Old Testament is About ..."

"Oh I'm sure it did."

Mary

A Televised Execution is a Moral, ..."

"For what its worth, it seems like the whole thing originated from Pete Hegsith speaking ..."

Evil-Striker

A Televised Execution is a Moral, ..."

"You may be right. A war and its aftermath are different than day-to-day governance. Still, ..."

Mary

On Traditionalist Bullies, and the Death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Let not your hearts be troubled"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Peter Paul Jesus