Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
No, Trump isn’t Pro-Life, or Pro-Choice

No, Trump isn’t Pro-Life, or Pro-Choice

Last updated on: August 30, 2024 at 10:18 pm by Mary Pezzulo

0 Comments

No, Trump isn’t Pro-Life, or Pro-Choice 2024-08-30T22:18:55-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A pregnant woman embracing her belly, with the ultrasound of a fetus about 20 weeks old visible on the belly. The baby is turned sideways for some reason.

image via Pixabay

Let’s talk about the pro-life movement again. It’s been getting a whole lot of press lately.

Just to be clear, before we begin, I’m going to be using the word “fetus” to describe a baby that hasn’t been born yet and “infant” to describe a born baby, because that’s the proper medical term and it’s easier to understand what I’m saying if I do that. I’ve heard some pro-life people say “fetus” is a dehumanizing term and a way of signalizing you don’t value babies, but that’s never made sense to me. “Fetus” is just a Latin word that means “offspring.” It’s not a slur. And when I say “pro-life movement,” I’m not talking about this or that individual person who donates to the diaper drive, or who gets together with their friends to throw baby showers for poor women, or who babysits their single friend’s child for free so she can finish college, or anything like that. I’m talking about the political movement and the people who believe in that political movement to the hilt. Is that understood? All right, now we’re off to the races. Let’s talk about the pro-life movement.

After bullying everyone that we were a bunch of sinful baby killers if we didn’t vote for the newly Republican Donald Trump in 2016, and canonizing Trump as their hero after the overturning of Roe Versus Wade in 2022, the pro-life movement has been having a bit of buyer’s remorse. This is because the Republican party is having buyers’ remorse about the pro-life movement. The scattershot abortion bans across the country are causing chaos, hurting and maiming women suffering miscarriages as their doctors and emergency room staff waste time trying to figure out what they’re allowed to do without facing prosecution. And the bans haven’t brought down abortion rates either: the number of legal abortions nationwide has been going up since about 2017 and didn’t stop after Dobbs. It’s been pointed out that some of this rise in abortion rates might be due to expanded access to abortion pills, and that may well be part of it right now. But the change in the FDA’s rules about abortion pills happened in January of 2023, and those rates started climbing six years earlier when Republicans took control of the House and the Senate as well as the White House. Whatever the reason, the pro-life movement got their way and the abortion rate continued to climb. And ever since then, pro-life politicians have been losing at the ballot box. So many Republican candidates have started to distance themselves from the pro-life movement so that they can win elections and accomplish their actual agenda, which is mostly about tax cuts for rich people. Donald Trump is among these.

Last Friday morning, Trump posted to Truth Social: “my administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights!”

I watched as pro-lifers expressed their horror on social media.

Meanwhile, pro-choice people on social media warned each other, unnecessarily, that he was lying and definitely going to sign a nationwide abortion ban if one crossed his desk.

Yesterday, Thursday, Trump was asked how he’d be voting on a bill in his home state of Florida. If made into law, the bill would permit abortion up until viability (about 24 weeks of gestation), replacing Florida’s current law which forbids all abortions after six weeks. He seemed to say that he’d be voting “yes” on the pro-choice bill, in his usual garbled way. “I think the six week is too short. It has to be more time. I told them that I want more weeks. I am going to be voting that we need more than six weeks.” And all around social media, I saw pro-lifers despair. They were sad that they’d been tricked. They thought they were getting a pro-life president, but they were used. And the pro-choice people still didn’t believe him.

This afternoon, Friday, I started to write this article and then left the tab open as I went to the grocery store. When I got back, I had to edit a portion of it, because he’d changed his position on abortion yet again., presumably in response to his pro-life voter base gnashing their teeth. “So I think six weeks, you need more time than six weeks. I’ve disagreed with that right from the early primaries when I heard about it, I disagreed with it. At the same time, the Democrats are radical, because the nine months is just a ridiculous situation where you can do an abortion in the ninth month. … So I’ll be voting no for that reason.”

His NEWEST, newest position, then, won’t be voting “no” on the Florida abortion bill to save babies’ lives. He’ll be voting “no” to stick it to the Democrats. Lord knows what he’ll say tomorrow.

For the record, I still don’t think that Donald Trump is actually going to vote “no” in November. I think he’s going to check off the box voting for himself in the presidential race, leave the rest of the ticket blank, and go about his business.

I don’t believe he’s pro-life. He’s not pro-choice either; he’s always been something else. It’s just more obvious now.

The pro-choice argument is that women are persons and that fetuses aren’t persons until they’re born; that’s why the woman has the right to decided to continue the pregnancy or not. I used to believe that the pro-life argument was that both women and fetuses are persons, and I still think a lot of pro-lifers believe that. After witnessing the events from 2016 to the present day, I’m forced to admit that many in the pro-life movement, and especially those dictating their policy choices, think that fetuses are persons and women aren’t, a bizarre position that makes no sense. But I think there are still people who believe both are persons.

There is also a third position, which monstrously evil people have taken throughout history, and that’s that neither women nor fetuses are persons, but everybody is an instrument to be used. That’s the Nazis, who were completely anti-abortion for Aryan women no matter how those women felt abut it but pro-abortion and pro-infanticide for anyone else. That’s China’s one-child policy. That’s the people who trafficked slaves in America, wanting Black women to have lots of babies to sell right up until Black people were emancipated and then they wanted Black women sterilized. I was raised to believe that their position is identical to the pro-choice one, but it’s not. It’s its own category.

When I hear J. D. Vance talk, his sadistic disdain for women, his inability to not mock and belittle us, his weird fixation on having babies as the only thing that gives anybody any right to participate in society, I surmise that he’s the strange and cruel version of a pro-lifer I mentioned. I think he thinks that fetuses may be persons worth saving, but women certainly aren’t. Women are just wombs. As a Catholic, I cannot support that in any way. My faith informs me that men and women are both humans, created in the image and likeness of God. You can’t hold an ethic that reduces us to incubators. Vance is wrong.

When I hear Donald Trump talk, on the other hand, all I hear is manipulation and grift.

I hear him saying absolutely anything that he thinks his audience wants to hear so they’ll give him what he wants in return. He’ll call for post-abortive mothers to be punished, then call himself “pro-life, with some exceptions,” and then mutter about states’ rights, and then claim to be pro-choice again, and then claim he’s pro-life, then he’ll make up a conspiracy theory about infanticide, but he doesn’t believe any of it. He wants to be a strongman dictator so he can enjoy giving speeches and having parades in his honor. He wants to have the ability to make all his legal woes disappear. He wants to be rich and famous. He wants revenge on his enemies. That’s all he cares about, and he’ll do anything, no matter how underhanded, to make us give it to him. And as he gets older and more out of control, he’ll do more and more reckless things to get what he wants. People aren’t persons at all to him; they’re marks for his con. Nobody has any intrinsic value at all.

That puts Trump in that last category. That makes him somebody who doesn’t see women or fetuses, or infants or teenagers or men for that matter, as persons. He sees every one of us as instruments. He wouldn’t particularly wish to commit an atrocity like the Holocaust, but he would if he thought he could make a few bucks from it and he wouldn’t be sorry. That’s the very worst kind of man.

Yet I was told, way back in 2016, that I would go to hell and burn for eternity if I didn’t vote for him.

And now, here we are. The pro-life movement has pinned all their hope on Donald Trump, and he yanked out the rug. No one trusts them anymore, because they’re not worthy of our trust. They spiritually abused thousands of people into voting for a con artist who tried to overthrow our democracy and will probably try it again. Women are miscarrying in parking lots and losing their fertility because doctors are afraid to operate: and the abortion rates are going UP anyway. It’s the worst of all possible worlds.

How did we get here?

How did people who claim they just want to save babies, end up hitching their saddle to the worst and the second-worst man in the country?

Well, they’ve been hitching their saddles to progressively worse men for a long time now. I remember, or maybe I just think I remember, a time when people who claim to be pro-life really talked about being “pro-women, pro-child” or “loving them both” or “a consistent life ethic.” They were as against abortion as they were against the death penalty and war. And those people still exist, on an individual basis, but not as a movement. The movement just became a movement that worshipped Republican politicians no matter what, and only cared about overturning Roe and enacting legal abortion bans. It wasn’t about compassion or building a culture of life, it was all about feting certain human beings while threatening others with jail. It wasn’t about making a world where people felt safe starting families, it was about burning the whole world to the ground and then terrorizing families with the unborn as an excuse.

What if we’d stopped trying to hurt and punish people?

What if we’d stuck with that “consistent life ethic” business and really leaned into it? What if we’d supported every policy that could really make it easy to make the decision to bring children in this world– yes, in federal and state laws, but also in our culture, in our churches, in our interactions with one another? What if, when people thought about a pro-life Christian, they thought about the most loving and generous considerate “woke” people they knew?

The pro-life movement kept on kissing cynical politicians right on the lips, and now it’s got a mouthful of cold sores, and voters are so disgusted they don’t want to hear the message.

Serves them right.

Mary Pezzulo is the author of Meditations on the Way of the Cross, The Sorrows an d Joys of Mary, and Stumbling into Grace: How We Meet God in Tiny Works of Mercy.

Steel Magnificat operates almost entirely on tips. To tip the author, donate to “The Little Portion” on paypal or Mary Pezzulo on venmo

Politics and Religion

American Christianity

Previous Post

August 29, 2024

The Cardinal's Catechism

Next Post

September 1, 2024 A Touch of Supernatural

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Thank you for bringing so much goodness into the lives of so many children.Ran across ..."

alwayspuzzled

The Passion of the Red Oak

"This current administration has had me reflecting on the Nuremberg trials and the like, for ..."

axelbeingcivil

On Traditionalist Bullies, and the Death ..."

"You're talking about supercessionism, the idea that Christians "replace" the covenant that the Jewish people ..."

Alex

Yes, the Old Testament is About ..."

"Oh I'm sure it did."

Mary

A Televised Execution is a Moral, ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Hebrew word 'Shekinah' mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Everlasting Light Divine Presence Holy Fire God’s Glory