Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
A Deeply Disappointing Angelus Address

A Deeply Disappointing Angelus Address

Last updated on: October 2, 2022 at 2:27 pm by Mary Pezzulo

A Deeply Disappointing Angelus Address 2022-10-02T14:27:02-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

During my tenure as Someone Who Expresses Opinions on the Internet, I have defended Pope Francis an awful lot.

I have made fun of sedevacantists. I have called out tiresome internet traditionalists who make up conspiracy theories and show know respect for the Holy Father. I have been vehement in my defense of the Pope, whom I genuinely like most of the time, and I’m not a bit sorry.

I am not going to defend Pope Francis today. I’m going to call him out. And I don’t think my reason for doing so will please traditionalists, so I suppose my position is consistent.

Today at his Angelus Address, the Holy Father made remarks which could far too easily be construed as taking a “both sides” approach to the horrific war in Ukraine. I don’t know if that’s what he meant to do, but that’s how it sounds. And saying something that even sounds like such an approach is grossly irresponsible and offensive.

As most of you already know, for the past seven months, Ukraine has been embroiled in a terrible war which they did not provoke in any way except by existing. Despite the condemnation of the rest of the world and vehement protests by his own people, Russian president Vladimir Putin sent his troops to invade and conquer Ukraine in what he meant to be a 72-hour blitz, but thanks to the tenacity of the Ukrainian people and their courageous president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Russians have not been able to take the country. Over the past month they have been repulsed and driven back toward the Russian border in a series of battles that have won the admiration of the world. Every time the Russians have gained ground, they have committed atrocities. They have used thermobaric weapons. They have murdered civilians, including children. They have bombed hospitals. They have targeted nuclear facilities. And now Putin has taken it a step further, holding a sham referendum and announcing the annexation of regions of Ukraine he is swiftly losing– all while menacing the entire world with threats of nuclear war.

In most conflicts, I think it’s safe to say that both sides are partly at fault and a compromise can be reached. But this is patently not the case in the Ukraine war. Russia, or rather their increasingly deranged president, is entirely at fault. The Ukrainian people have been victims of an atrocity and they didn’t do anything except defend themselves. If they tried to compromise, they would be victims of further brutality, because they person they’re fighting against can’t be reasoned with. He wants to commit a genocide, whether the Ukrainians lie down and take it or keep fighting back. The only way to avoid the genocide is for Ukraine to keep fighting and the whole world to come to Ukraine’s aid. That approach is the anti-war option, in this case. Asking for a compromise is tantamount to telling the Jewish, Romany and other victims of the Nazi genocide in World War Two to compromise with the Third Reich.

In this context, the Holy Father addressed the war in Ukraine today. He dedicated his entire Angelus address to the topic, stating that “The course of the war in Ukraine has become so serious, devastating and threatening, as to cause great concern. Therefore, today I would like to devote the entire reflection before the Angelus to this. Indeed, this terrible and inconceivable wound to humanity, instead of healing, continues to shed even more blood, risking to spread further.”

Right off the bat, I question why he would make those remarks today, when the rest of the world is celebrating that Ukraine has decisively taken back a huge chunk of its own land and freed the inhabitants from their genocidal captors. That’s the beginning of a healing if ever there was one. You’d think the Pope would be celebrating that and merely condemning Putin’s threats. It sounds as though he’s upset about Ukraine’s recent victories. Maybe that’s not what he meant, but it’s how it looks. If he’s just upset over Putin’s stunt, he should say so.

Pope Francis continues in several paragraphs to condemn the genocide in Ukraine and the violations of international law, as well he might. He addresses Russia “first and foremost” and begs for an end to the conflict, which is just. But then he goes on: “On the other hand, saddened by the immense suffering of the Ukrainian people as a result of the aggression they have suffered, I address an equally confident appeal to the President of Ukraine to be open to serious proposals for peace. I urge all the protagonists of international life and the political leaders of nations to do everything possible to bring an end to the war, without allowing themselves to be drawn into dangerous escalations, and to promote and support initiatives for dialogue. Please let the younger generations breathe the salutary air of peace, not the polluted air of war, which is madness. After seven months of hostilities, let us use all diplomatic means, even those that may not have been used so far, to bring an end to this terrible tragedy. War in itself is an error and a horror!”

I don’t think Pope Francis meant to imply that Ukrainians share some fault for this war and ought to be willing to cede ground, but that is what’s implied. Telling the victims of such an atrocity to “be open to serious proposals for peace” assumes that serious proposals for peace have been made, which they haven’t, or that they will conceivably be made, which they won’t. The only “proposal for peace” that Putin might make is to let him keep the regions he’s annexed and butcher their inhabitants, which would not be a proposal for peace but a horrendous act of violence in itself. The Holy Father is being grossly irresponsible to suggest such a thing, even by accident.

Calling on other states to not allow themselves to be drawn in and to “promote and support initiatives for dialogue” is similarly irresponsible and blaming the victim, even though I don’t think that’s how it was meant. The only way this conflict will end is if the Russian people depose Putin, withdraw their troops immediately and make restitution to Ukraine. Other nations demanding “dialogue” without intervening will only result in the murder of more Ukrainians.

Worse still, after the address, the Pope Francis Twitter account (which is obviously not directly run by Francis himself) tweeted “Saddened by the immeasurable suffering of the Ukrainian people as a result of the aggression, I address the President of Ukraine with the same confidence, urging him to be open to serious peace proposals” and tagged Zelenskyy’s Twitter. This was part of a series of chunks of the Angelus address tweeted out, not as a thread but as a series of single tweets so the audience couldn’t immediately see the context. And, at least according to Google Translate which I used to see what the Pope was saying, they tweeted it in Russian, not Ukrainian. Commentators were so confused and offended they assumed the Pope had been hacked.

Again, I don’t think Pope Francis himself meant to be so insulting to the victims of this genocide, but the tweet is at minimum a public relations nightmare.

Nothing Ukraine can do will stop this atrocity, save for what they’re already doing. They can keep fighting back until the Russian troops are back in Russia where they belong. Any “proposal for peace” they accept will leave their own countrymen dead.

It’s grossly irresponsible for the Pope to be so careless in his address. He needs to apologize and clarify his statement. I don’t think he’s going to do that, but he should.

My prayers go out to the Ukrainian people, to the brave Russians who are defying their tyrannical president, and to everyone fighting to defend Ukraine from this genocide. You deserve better.

image via Pixabay

Mary Pezzulo is the author of Meditations on the Way of the Cross, The Sorrows and Joys of Mary, and Stumbling into Grace: How We Meet God in Tiny Works of Mercy.

Steel Magnificat operates almost entirely on tips. To tip the author, visit our donate page.

Previous Post

September 30, 2022

The Guinea Pig Song

Next Post

October 5, 2022 In the Best Month

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say in Philemon he would have liked to keep Onesimus to do?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Preach the word Help him while he is in chains for the gospel Serve in the church Care for the poor