Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
My Final Word Before You Vote

My Final Word Before You Vote

Last updated on: October 30, 2020 at 3:18 pm by Mary Pezzulo

My Final Word Before You Vote 2020-10-30T15:18:31-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have said again and again that I don’t like writing about politics.

This is the worst part about being a blogger. I take a few hours to write something I think is really important and beautiful, and I get a few sincere compliments for what a poet I am, and I love those. I write an angry response to something I shouldn’t have to respond to in the first place because in a better world it wouldn’t be happening, and the post goes viral and people come out of the woodwork to tell me I’m in mortal sin. This happens a lot. I truly believe there are much better things we ought to do with our time than obsess over politics. Oh, we ought to vote and let our conscience inform that vote. That’s necessary. But our kingdom is not of this world, and our salvation is not going to come through politicians. You should vote, and then you should spend the other 525599 minutes of your year doing other things that will help your neighbor more efficiently.

Now, that said, we’re staring a presidential election in the face. Many people have already voted early or absentee, which is safe and secure. But I need to talk just one more time before Tuesday to everybody who hasn’t voted yet– particularly my fellow Catholics.

The first thing I want to say is that it’s not a sin to vote Republican, and it’s not a sin to vote Democrat, and it’s not a sin to vote third party, and it’s not a sin to decline to vote– depending on your reason. You may not vote for a candidate who supports an intrinsic wrong, BECAUSE of the wrong that the candidate supports. To do so would be a sin. But it’s not a sin to vote for that candidate because of some good they’ll do, IN SPITE OF that intrinsic wrong. And the fact is, every candidate who stand’s a snowball’s chance at the presidency supports at least one intrinsic wrong. If you vote for them anyway because you think that doing so will mitigate some even worse evil, you’re not in sin. If you can’t stand to vote for any of them because you honestly believe they’re all the same, that’s not a sin either. You can be factually correct or incorrect, but it’s not a sin. And it’s not just me the crazy woman blogger saying that. It’s Pope Emeritus Benedict, when he was Cardinal Ratzinger, speaking for the CDF:

N.B. A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia. When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.

If you in conscience discern a proportionate reason to vote the way you do, you’re not sinning. Of course, I think it’s implied by the Pope’s words that you are responsible to fight that candidate on any evil he does try to do if he does get elected. Don’t ever join a candidate’s cult of personality. Do what you have to do, and then be prepared for to fight to mitigate evil anyway.

So that’s the first thing I want to say. Don’t listen to people who tell you you’ll go to hell if you don’t vote the way they want you to. Those people are spiritually abusing you and misrepresenting the faith.

The next things I’m going to tell you are not the teaching of the Catholic Church, they’re just my assessment of what is going on in our country and what could best mitigate all the death, destruction and suffering we’re witnessing. Someone once angrily wrote to me “You should make it clear that these blog posts are just your opinion!” and I thought that was a weird thing to say. I’m a blogger. I write opinion pieces. That’s what I do. That doesn’t mean my opinion can’t be badly informed or well informed, or that my guesses as to what might happen can be proven right or wrong. I try to have the most informed opinion I can, and to communicate what is my opinion and what’s actual church teaching. We are all responsible for being wise as serpents while innocent as doves: for being as informed and clever as we can be so that we can make morally good choices. This blog represents my informed opinions on how best to be good.

I want to point out to you, first of all, that Donald Trump cannot and will not make abortion go away, even if he wanted to. In fact, he’s making it worse.

Trump’s Supreme Court appointees might reverse Roe versus Wade, though personally I doubt that they will. After all, Republican justices ruled on Roe versus Wade in the first place, and Republican justices upheld the ruling in Planned Parenthood versus Casey. But I could be wrong. If they do reverse Roe, that will not make abortion go away. Abortion was legal in twenty US states plus the military before Roe, and was available in some form at the right price in all of them. If abortion is made illegal in some states, we have good reason to expect based on real evidence gathered from how women responded to the temporary COVID-19 restrictions on elective procedures like abortions, that the abortion rates won’t drop. Instead, women will just go elsewhere for their abortions or get them in a different way. That’s tragic and horrible, but that’s what will happen. My evidence and reasoning on that can be found in this post. And anyway, if you only voted for Trump to get that conservative majority on the Supreme Court, you already have it. That reason’s gone now. You’ll have to look at everything else he’s likely to do to make your choice.

We can also observe in real time that abortion rates are going up under Trump. The total number won’t be known for some time. But the Heritage Foundation, which is certainly not a left-wing propaganda organization, has noted that Planned Parenthood had their highest abortion rates ever recorded during the Trump administration– and that’s before COVID-19 and the stock market crash. That’s what was happening the first two years. Also, we have the evidence I linked to in the article I mentioned above: COVID-19 itself is driving abortion rates through the roof. This is happening right now. The clinics themselves have been nearly overwhelmed. Women who might have re-thought abortion before, and even women who wanted to be pregnant, are going through with abortions now. The reasons they give for their abortion, are directly to do with the pandemic. A candidate who takes the pandemic seriously and works as hard as he can to combat it rather than being in denial about it could put that particular genie back into the bottle, no matter how that candidate feels about abortion.

So, we have before us one candidate that will keep abortion legal but might cause it to happen less often in practice or maybe not. We have one candidate who won’t be able to ban abortion at a national level and on whose watch the abortion rates are going way up. That’s the choice you have, as far as abortion. Two bad options and one might be worse, but we’re not going to be able to make abortion go away.

Now, let me draw attention to some other human lives worthy of our concern.

For years now, we’ve watched President Trump’s barbaric and inhumane practices at the Southern border, removing children from their families and keeping immigrants in unsanitary and inhumane conditions. Some of those children died. All were traumatized. We’re now being told that there are 525 children still in detention whose parents simply can’t be found– 525 families broken, perhaps permanently. Trump’s supporters have said that this isn’t his fault, that the children were actually saved from danger rather than being put in it, and that this is Obama’s fault for building the cages anyway. So please read this warts-and-all explanation of what’s going on, written by my friend who works in an immigration law firm:

Family immigration detention (for a period of 20 days) has been around since 2011, often using existing federal detention facilities that were used for other types of “offenders” before being privatized and used to profit off of asylum-seeking families. “Catch and release” refers to detaining these families for 20 days to begin to “process” them (this dehumanizing language is just part of it all, but I chafe at normalizing it) before being paroled or released with ankle monitors and given check-in dates as well as a first master calendar hearing date to determine how the immigrant respondents would plead and what form of immigration relief they would be seeking in their proceedings.

Minor-only detention facilities with chain-link (“the perreras,” or the cages referenced in the infamous “kids in cages” line) were established hastily around 2014 to handle a sudden crush of unaccompanied minors at the border. I don’t like this solution, but it’s a fact that it was not equivalent to what came later.

“Zero-tolerance” intentional separation of parents or caregivers and their minor children or loved ones was a deterrence policy established by the Trump administration, piloted in 2017 and expanded in 2018 before a federal judge ended it. Some sophistry rose up around the idea, with various pundits and Trump surrogates claiming it was necessary in order to determine whether a minor was being trafficked, but this was not the design. The design, as we know from lots and lots of investigative reporting verified many times over, was to send a message to would-be asylum-seekers that they would lose their children if they attempted to enter the country without authorization, or even if they attempted to enter at a Port of Entry and announce their intention to seek asylum.

The 525 children who are still under the charge of HHS, whose parents were deported without them, were part of that initial 2017 quiet pilot of the Zero-Tolerance enforcement initiative. They were not, as PragerU and others have claimed, trafficked by “coyotes” or people pretending to be their parents. (It’s also not at all uncommon for Central American families to be raising nieces, nephews, younger cousins, or grandchildren without a formal adoption agreement, and these cases are often misidentified as “trafficking.”)

Ultimately, detaining parents or one parent while paroling children is family separation, too. Deportation is family separation, too. Detaining families together is still unjust, no matter how “clean” the facility, and forcing them through any kind of expedited removal proceeding is a violation of due process. We have to reimagine what immigration is going to look like, beyond the “enforcement” model, because

P E O P L E M I G R A T E.

Migration isn’t going away.

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have their hands clean on this issue, and that’s a fact. But Trump absolutely did make it worse for the migrants, and especially their children, on purpose in order to look tough. He is the one responsible for those 525 currently stranded children, and for all the additional trauma and horror that those thousands of children suffered. He did it because he wanted to. Yesterday, Joe Biden proposed a task force to reunite the 525 stranded children with their families, if he’s elected. I don’t know if he’ll be able to do that, but he promised to try. I realize that’s cold comfort considering there’s so much more he could have done, but at least he wants to help now. Trump does not.

I also would like you to watch this informative video. I know John Oliver isn’t to everybody’s taste, I’m sorry for the swearing, and I do disagree with him on many things, but listen to what he has to say on asylum seekers trapped at the Southern border. Look at their faces. Listen to their fears.

Asylum seekers are being sent to their deaths. Not scary gangsters, but children and mothers and grandmothers. No matter how well they behave, or how scrupulously they obey the United States’ immigration laws, they’re being treated worse than animals. The Trump administration has deliberately made it as difficult and painful as possible for them, when it was extremely difficult in the first place. Biden has promised to at least reverse the most draconian restrictions Trump put in place.

It’s not enough, but it’s far more than nothing.

Here are some actual, concrete people we stand a chance of helping. Here are some people who need us, and our vote makes a difference for them.

I don’t like Joe Biden for a number of reasons. As a Catholic, I find him less than adequate on many issues. But I don’t believe him to be a sadistic sociopath, and watching how President Trump has treated immigrants I can’t say the same for him. I believe that Biden is going to do something to mitigate the horrendous suffering of these refugees who came to us for help, and he might be influenced to do more if we hold him to it. I think Trump will only continue to get worse.

And I have similar beliefs about Trump and Biden, when it comes to other vulnerable people such as those on Medicaid and on EBT benefits. Trump not only doesn’t seem to care about poor Americans, he seems to relish their suffering. Biden seems to not want to make matters worse. Climate change is another thing that will disproportionately effect the poor and vulnerable. Trump does not seem to believe that man-made climate change exists and Biden does, and has some plans that will mitigate it at least to an extent. Those could prevent more deaths and human suffering. Trump seems to regard racism and police violence as something to be egged on in the name of Law and Order, and Biden does not think that way– though I don’t think he understands the problem, at least he doesn’t like it.

I don’t think we can stop abortion, which is just as well because the supposed pro-life candidate is only driving abortion rates up. I think we can save quite a few lives, born and unborn, and undo some of the horrendous suffering that’s been caused, and prevent some future horrendous suffering as well.

That’s why, as a Catholic, I voted for Joe Biden last week. That’s why, as a Catholic blogger, I’m asking you to do the same. I’m not claiming it’s a sin if you don’t, because that’s not for me to say. I’m just putting it out there one more time: this seems to me to be the best way to save lives, and that’s something you ought to care about.

And please, however you vote, spend the rest of your year helping people. That’s what we’re supposed to be doing.

Image via Pixabay.

Mary Pezzulo is the author of Meditations on the Way of the Cross.

Steel Magnificat operates almost entirely on tips. To tip the author, visit our donate page.

America

Catholic

catholic conspiracy alarmism

Public face of Catholicism

Previous Post

October 26, 2020

Zinnias in the Plague Time

Next Post

November 1, 2020 A Treat on a Grim All Saints Day

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Job lost all his children, wealth, and health in a single day.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE