Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
How Can Someone Sin Against Ecology?

How Can Someone Sin Against Ecology?

Last updated on: November 17, 2019 at 1:47 pm by Mary Pezzulo

How Can Someone Sin Against Ecology? 2019-11-17T13:47:35-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve seen a lot of people balking at the idea of a “sin against ecology” lately. Our Holy Father has mentioned adding “ecological sins” to the catechism, and I’ve noticed people acting as though this is something new– a great big change totally out of left field for Catholicism. How can someone sin against ecology?

But it’s not terribly difficult to me, to think about what a sin against ecology might be. It seems to follow from what we know already.

We’re Catholics, after all. We already know that our physical bodies and the creation we live in matter. We don’t just pray and meditate with our minds; we use our bodies in worship. Our sacraments involve outward signs from the created world like oil and water and bread. We have rules about the colors of vestment the priest wears based on the liturgical season, the materials out of which we can make chalices, and the physical shape of our altars– they have to have four corners, for the four corners of the earth. The Mass draws us up to Heaven, but it also takes place on Earth just as the Crucifixion of Christ did– indeed, we’re revisiting the Crucifixion, that junction between Heaven and Earth, every time we go to Mass. We calculate our liturgical year based on the seasons going on in nature and the movement of the earth around the sun: a vigil begins after sunset, Easter falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon on or after the vernal equinox. We bring flowers and palm branches to church and walk out wearing ashes, based on the seasons. We have rules about when to fast, when to abstain from meat, when we have to leave our houses and go to church, what way it’s okay to have sexual intercourse and with who. The physical world was created by God on purpose, God loves it, and we are part of it. What we do in the physical world matters. That’s Catholicism.

It’s nothing new or scandalous to say that you can sin against the environment, against the world you live in. And it’s easy to see why when you consider that all human beings live on the earth. Remember, we as Catholics are supposed to believe that our neighbor is “another self,” someone we’re supposed to love as we love our own selves. If we choose to hurt our neighbor because it’s inconvenient not to, we commit the sin of sloth. If we choose to hurt our neighbor so that we can have a luxury or a treat we want, we commit the sin of greed. This has always been our teaching.

How would you feel if your next door neighbor helped herself to your vegetable patch without asking whenever she wanted a snack, leaving none for you? What if she dumped trash all over your yard and poisoned your pets, or your children? What if she started cutting down your carefully cultivated ornamental trees? What if she started burning her garbage in her backyard at all hours of the day, and you couldn’t enjoy being outside in your yard without getting sick?

Now, remember that, according to our faith, everyone is our neighbor. Physical proximity isn’t what determines whether we have to love someone as we love our own self. Being in the same country, culture or race isn’t what does it. Our mere shared humanity does it. In many cases we might find ourselves having more responsibility for the person on our doorstep than the person living far away because that’s all we can be expected to do as finite humans, but that doesn’t mean we’re allowed to disregard the well-being of humans far away. They are our responsibility. We are all each other’s responsibility, and insofar as we can avoid hurting them, we must avoid it or we sin.

And the terrible truth is that the things we do, here in industrialized and wealthy countries like the United States, are hurting our neighbors all over the world. Our way of life right now actually is stealing our neighbors’ food, poisoning their air, dumping trash in their yards. We are poisoning their children and pets– everyone’s children and pets. We are blowing smoke in their air. People just like us, as unique as we are and whom God loves as much as He loves us, are suffering because of the choices our society has made. People find themselves having a harder and harder time growing nutritious food. They have a harder and harder time breathing clean air. They are getting sick from the water they need to drink and bathe in to survive. People who experience the majesty of God by gazing at the stars or walking in the woods or enjoying the company of animals, are finding that the stars are dimmed by pollution, the woods are getting smaller, and the animals are disappearing.

Insofar as we have choices about this, these are not morally neutral actions. We’re hurting our neighbor, and we need to repent and stop.

The Catholic church is not adverse to science. Catholics, as we were all told in Catholic school, invented the Big Bang theory and the science of genetics; Catholics are allowed to believe in evolution and things like that. We’re not Luddites opposed to new science, the way some Evangelicals are; we are people who incorporate advances in the sciences into our understanding of the world God created, and used them to help make ethical choices. Catholics believe in using the sciences to understand and improve our lives. To help us understand and improve our relationship with our neighbors all over the world, we need to consult the scientists who study ecology and the climate. True, these scientists are fallible. They don’t know everything, and they often change their theories based on new information. But they do the best they can based on the information they have: and the general consensus among such scientists these days, is that the earth is on the brink of an ecological catastrophe which will cause suffering for everyone, for all of our neighbors near and far, if we don’t do something fast.

This isn’t a crisis that can be averted just by turning off the water when you brush your teeth and ordering that weird sippy lid at Starbuck’s– though that’s one of the things I’m doing just in case it helps. It especially can’t be solved by insisting that the most helpless among us make the biggest sacrifices: by saying that disabled people will have to chip their teeth on metal straws and people with asthma can’t have inhalers anymore, or things of that nature. I keep seeing those issues discussed, but they’re not going to work. First of all, it’s totally unjust to point the finger at helpless people and insist they make their crosses even heavier so that we can go on living as we wish. Secondly, it’s a red herring. If all the straws and inhalers in the world disappeared today, we would still be on the verge of an ecological catastrophe.

Instead, we’re going to have to insist that the most powerful people in our society, the people with the most choices, make drastic changes to the way their industries manufacture and transport products and dispose of waste. We are all going to have to be willing to accept changes in our own lives that result from the massive changes being made above our heads. I don’t know how those changes will affect our lifestyles. There’s a great deal of scaremongering going on about how these changes will make us all completely miserable and I don’t think that’s true, though I’m sure we’ll be inconvenienced especially at first. But we’re Catholic. We ought to be used to the idea that sometimes, choosing not to commit a sin that hurts our neighbor is inconvenient and requires sacrifice– but it’s our responsibility to choose rightly anyway. Just ask an NFP coach or the person they get to lecture teenagers on chastity about that. This is right in our wheelhouse. We already know how to accept inconvenience for the sake of doing the right thing. We ought to be better at this than everybody else, not stubbornly insisting on being worse.

If you choose to do something that you know will hurt your neighbor, you sin. That’s always been Catholic teaching and it goes back before Catholicism to the Old Testament as well. Choosing to hurt your neighbor so that you can live as you wish is a sin. Thanks to advances in the sciences, we now know other ways in which our lifestyles might be hurting our neighbor, and we have to repent of those and choose differently even when it’s not much fun. Not to do so would be the sins of sloth and greed. That’s not a brand new bizarre wrinkle being introduced to Catholic teaching; it’s just applying our teaching to new information.

There’s no reason in the world we should be afraid to apply teaching to new information. This is just another way we’re called to live in harmony with our neighbor in the world God created. Sins against ecology are nothing new, and neither is our need to repent.

(image via Pixabay)

Steel Magnificat operates almost entirely on tips. To tip the author, visit our donate page.

New Pro-Life Movement

Public face of Catholicism

Previous Post

November 17, 2019

The Ending Will Not Come At Once

Next Post

November 18, 2019 No, Father Valanmanal, Autism is Not a Punishment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am the first to fall asleep in death for following Jesus. I saw heaven opened as stones struck me. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Stephen Peter James