Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Diocese of Amarillo: Pavone Not A Priest in Good Standing

Diocese of Amarillo: Pavone Not A Priest in Good Standing

Last updated on: October 16, 2019 at 7:44 pm by Mary Pezzulo

Diocese of Amarillo: Pavone Not A Priest in Good Standing 2019-10-16T19:44:54-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yet again, I thought we were done talking about corruption in the pro-life movement for awhile. I have tried to praise innovative pro-life charities doing admirable things, like New Wave Feminists, the Family Life Campaign and Rehumanize International, whenever I can, but I always find myself writing about the old, mainstream pro-life movement’s many train wrecks as I go along.

Today I have to talk yet again about the granddaddy of the mainstream pro-life movement, Father Frank Pavone.

You may recall that I have been deeply disturbed by what appears to be rampant disrespect for corpses by Pavone and his charity, Priests for Life. I’ve been calling for accountability for this for years, but nothing has been done. Priests for Life is just about the most famous pro-life organization out there; it ought to be an exemplar of ethics, and by all accounts it isn’t. And as for Pavone, his antics have just gotten more disturbing since he used naked human remains as a prop for a political ad back in 2016.

On Instagram recently, someone asked Pavone if he still had “that dead baby stored,” and yesterday Pavone responded. Yesterday was Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Day; many of my friends online were sharing heartrending stories along with solemn photos of ultrasounds and gravestones. It’s a difficult day for any parents who have been through such a horror. Pavone’s statement on Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Day was:

“Come to a burial, if you dare, you damn coward. But don’t worry. If you don’t come in person, you still won’t be able to escape it, because the next time I do one of these burials is going to be so widely broadcast that nobody is going to miss it. Get ready. Buy an extra supply of your anxiety calming drugs or whatever other prescriptions you are on. And share them with some of the bishops you are in contact with as well.”

This man claims that he counsels traumatized post-abortive women as one of his ministries. It’s one of the reasons people give him money. And on Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Day, he chose to get online and mock the mentally ill, especially those who take anxiety medication, while promising a real rock-em sock-em bombastic unforgettable dead baby funeral.

I’m also a little concerned that he claims the burial will be “so widely broadcast that nobody will be able to miss it.” Pavone broadcasts in two places that I know of: on YouTube and on EWTN. An ordinary funeral on EWTN is not exactly going to seize the attention of the entire world; it’s barely even going to ping on the radar of the Rosary-praying grannies who make up EWTN’s audience. An ordinary funeral on YouTube won’t draw much attention either. Is Pavone planning some kind of publicity stunt to wow the secular press? Is he going to go over Niagara Falls in a barrel? Do people still do that?

I kid, but there’s actually nothing funny about this kind of behavior from a priest. Real people are being hurt. I’ve already spoken with one bereaved mother who lost a child in infancy who really has needed anxiety medication due to being triggered by Pavone’s stunt in 2016. Carrying on like this in public is simply dangerous, and here he’s publicly confessing to plotting another publicity stunt involving a corpse. Who’s going to get hurt this time?

In addition, Pavone referred to his bishop as a “slave master.” When asked who his bishop was, he said “Lol. You mean slave master?”

This was the second time, to my knowledge, that Pavone has referred to the bishop who is supposed to be in authority over him as a “slave master;” it also happened a month ago when he and I spoke on Twitter before he emailed that burial certificate which he claimed proved that the infamous “Baby Choice” had been buried once and for all, although it only opened up more mysteries. Someone told him his bishop should require him to receive mental health treatment, and he said “I don’t believe in slave masters. Do you?”

I was frankly shocked that a priest in good standing would get away with saying nasty things like that about his bishop in public more than once. I wish I could be less jaded, and be shocked that a priest got away with the other things Pavone has done and still be a priest in good standing. But after the couple of years we’ve had in the Catholic Church, my capacity for shock is low. I apologize to the bishop of Amarillo for being such a cynic about his priorities. Still, a priest sassing a bishop like this sounds off limits.

So I called the Diocese of Amarillo. And they are the ones who told me that actually, Pavone is NOT a priest in good standing in their diocese.

Those were the exact words: “Actually, no, he’s not.”

I asked if they’d had any press release about this and they could only direct me to the one from November 8, 2016 after the dirty naked fetus on the altar stunt, and there was also a terse statement in 2012 that Bishup Zurek grants him permission “in individual cases, based upon their merits, to participate in pro-life events with the provision that he and I must be in agreement beforehand as to his role and function. All other matters are outside the purview of this statement.” The deacon who spoke with me said “nothing has changed,” and he further said that that the Diocese of Amarillo will not give him a letter declaring him in good standing when he goes out of the diocese.

I was absolutely shocked at this, and I’m still having trouble believing it. But if calling the diocese wasn’t enough, a reader showed me Pavone’s own website where he proudly displays his celabret card, the card that show’s he’s allowed to say Mass outside the diocese. And the card displayed expired February 1, 2016.

Now, this doesn’t mean he has no priestly faculties; this isn’t like the McCarrick situation or like when Pavone was suspended several years ago. He’s still a priest. But it isn’t a small matter either. As I’ve been given to understand, a priest who doesn’t have a letter declaring him in good standing isn’t allowed to say or con-celebrate public Masses outside their diocese, for example, and if they do it may be a valid sacrament but illicit. And as far as I can tell, since Priests for Life is located in Florida now, he’s always outside of the Amarillo diocese. In fact, here’s an article about him celebrating Mass in Pennsylvania on September 20th of this year. Why? Why didn’t the Shrine of Our Lady of Czestochowa ask to see his letter declaring him in good standing? Did they just not think to ask?

So, I guess everyone can stop calling the diocese of Amarillo.

Pavone is AWOL and openly mocking the notion of being under the authority of any bishop. Amarillo won’t give him a letter declaring him in good standing.

Charity Navigator only rates Priests for Life two stars, due to their lack of accountability and transparency– compared with four stars for Pro-life Across America and the Life Legal Defense Fund, so it’s not just that Charity Navigator doesn’t like pro-life charities.

As I documented in my previous post on him, we have some pretty compelling photographic evidence which Pavone himself has been releasing to the public all along, that he’s not burying the corpses he’s entrusted with in a timely fashion.

He spends his time on Twitter ranting about gun rights and approving the abuse of immigrant children.

And here he is mocking the mentally ill while promising another deeply traumatic publicity stunt with his macabre parade of infant corpses in the near future.

I think we as lay people are running out of options for what to do about him.

At minimum, everyone needs to stop giving him money.

(image via Pixabay)

Steel Magnificat runs almost entirely on tips. To tip the author, visit our donate page.

laity and lay vocations

mystery

New Pro-Life Movement

Public face of Catholicism

Our Lady of Czestochowa

Pavone

Priests for Life

slave master

Previous Post

October 15, 2019

A Faithful Catholic Priest is Under Attack

Next Post

October 17, 2019 Rosie Wins a Battle

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Romans say about the mind governed by the flesh versus the mind governed by the Spirit?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The flesh is weak, but the Spirit is strong The flesh seeks itself, but the Spirit seeks God The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace The flesh leads to sin, but the Spirit leads to righteousness