Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
What if we Applied Pro-Life Rhetoric to Guns?

What if we Applied Pro-Life Rhetoric to Guns?

Last updated on: September 7, 2019 at 1:58 am by Mary Pezzulo

What if we Applied Pro-Life Rhetoric to Guns? 2019-09-07T01:58:13-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was raised to believe that human life is important, and I believe it.

I was raised to believe that “it is poverty to believe that a child must die so that you can live as you wish,” and I believe that.

I was raised to believe that “but my rights!” are a selfish thing to say when a human child’s right to life is on the line, and I believe it.

I am a Catholic. I believe that the human embryo and fetus have personhood. I deeply oppose abortion. I don’t see eye to eye at all with the legal methods that the loudest voices in the pro-life movement say is the best way forward in saving babies, but I believe they should be saved. I am deeply invested in working to protect as many human lives as possible– with preferential treatment for the weakest and the helpless. That means children come first.

And that’s a line that gets bandied about a lot in the pro-life movement. “What if it saves even one child?” Wouldn’t all of this be worth it, if you could save one child?

Yesterday, in Texas, a child was shot in the face.

She is seventeen months old. She’s not dead, not yet. She has shrapnel in her chest and her little milk teeth have been knocked out. There’s a hole in her lip and tongue. Lord only knows what this will do to her development and the rest of her life.

She is lucky to be alive at all; seven other people are dead, many more are injured, and I suspect the death toll will rise before this is over. We’re told that the terrorist who shot her was another angry white man who went on a rampage, at one point hijacking a mail truck.

I see the same politicians who consider it a bold victory when a restriction is passed into law that will save very few if any unborn lives and stands a good chance of putting women who miscarry in danger, meekly offering the usual “thoughts and prayers” against gun violence. The people who will use any means they believe just might save one human life, if the life is unborn, are throwing up their hands and giving the matter over to God when it comes to any life that comes in the way of a gun.

We need guns, we are told, because guns save lives. We need every kind of gun available, no questions asked, for “safety.” We need to be allowed to open carry at the grocery store, because good folks who open carry are the only thing standing between us and another mass shooting. But above all, we need to have them available, because it is our right.

Of course, last month, there were plenty of good Texas conservatives open carrying guns at a Wal Mart in El Paso. They didn’t save the day. They probably knew very well that just shooting off your weapon in a situation like that will only make matters worse.

Still, we are loath to pass the kind of gun control laws they have in Europe and Canada, because we respect the right to bear arms. It doesn’t matter what the actual results of a culture this saturated with guns are; it’s our right to have them just because we want to. It’s our right to protect ourselves “with equal force,” no matter the collateral damage. It’s our right to “protect our families” in exactly the way we choose, and never mind what might result all around us, to other people’s families. It’s our right to try to out-stockpile the government if we want to, in case there’s a need for a well-regulated militia, and never mind what somebody else might do.

What if we decided to look at this in a different way?

What if we applied the rhetoric of the pro-life movement to gun control? What if instead of saying “But my rights!” We said “Imagine if it saves one child?”

What if we said that it’s selfishness to cry “what about my right to bear arms?” when it interferes with other people’s right to life?

What if we were willing to say to everyone, not just pregnant women but the good hearty American men who want to open carry at Wal Mart, that it is poverty to decide that child must die, must be permanently disabled, must lose her milk teeth and part of her tongue, so that you may live as you wish?

What if we were truly willing to be pro-life?

(image via Pixabay)

Steel Magnificat runs almost entirely on gratuities. To tip the author, go to our donate page here.

New Pro-Life Movement

pro-life

Public face of Catholicism

Previous Post

August 30, 2019

Passing the Hat For Fall

Next Post

September 2, 2019 Pretending Not to Look

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote the letter to the Hebrews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Peter Paul Unknown