Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Dear Father Reehill: Harry Potter Isn’t Real

Dear Father Reehill: Harry Potter Isn’t Real

Last updated on: September 7, 2019 at 1:57 am by Mary Pezzulo

Dear Father Reehill: Harry Potter Isn’t Real 2019-09-07T01:57:40-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I don’t want to talk about Harry Potter.

I don’t like the Harry Potter series very much. It’s not terrible, it’s just predictable and not my cup of tea. Maybe the problem is that I didn’t read the books until I was in my twenties, but they just don’t send me. I prefer Madeline L’engle, or Diana Wynne Jones, or Neil Gaiman. But for some reason, undead remnants of the Satanic Panic never rise up and attach themselves to A Wrinkle in Time; they always do so to Harry Potter.

And this has happened again this week. At a Catholic school in Nashville, Harry Potter books were removed from the library after the pastor randomly decided they were demonic and dangerous.

The pastor, Father Reehill, who sounds like a barrel of laughs, reports that “The curses and spells used in the books are actual curses and spells; which when read by a human being risk conjuring evil spirits into the presence of the person reading the text.” He claims he has discussed this with multiple Catholic exorcists, as if that proves anything. I am getting awfully tired of the “I talked it over with an anonymous exorcist and he authorized me to be silly” trope, myself. I am doubly tired of famous celebrity exorcists with cult followings, but that’s another story for another post.

I don’t really feel that something this asinine needs to be corrected, but I’ve seen a lot of people sharing his words approvingly around the internet, so I’ll put my oar in: first of all, this doesn’t sound like any kind of Catholic notion I’ve ever heard of what an evil spirit is. Evil spirits are fallen angels. Angels are spirits, superior to humans in intellect, that lack physical bodies. They are present with us in one way, but they can’t exactly be said to be present in a set place in time the same way physical things can; you can’t “conjure” them any more than saying the prayer to the Holy Archangel Saint Michael or carrying his icon “conjures” Saint Michael. He has immediate awareness so he knows when you’re asking him for his assistance, and I believe he listens and loves and assists us, and I’m grateful; Saint Michael is one of my favorite intercessors. Presumably something similar can happen with evil spirits: you could talk to one and they’d take advantage of that to your detriment. But you can’t teleport them physically into your midst by accidentally reciting a summoning spell while reading a book. That’s superstition, not Catholicism.

Secondly, the curses and spells used in the Harry Potter books are not “real spells.” They are plays on words in garbled Latin. “Expecto Patronum” means “I wait for a patron.” You can say “I wait for a patron” in Latin all you want and not conjure a spirit, or a patron for that matter. You could say “Mater Dei ora pro nobis*,*” and one particular patron would certainly assist you, but she wouldn’t be coming because of a spell you recited, she’d be graciously answering your request for help. Garbled Latin is irritating, but it’s not demonic, and it’s not a magical spell.

If garbled Latin were a magical spell, we would regularly hear about demonic occurrences happening at high-class prep schools, Tridentine Masses, and while tired medical students tried to memorize their anatomy textbooks. Attorneys would accidentally call up an army of zombies when they tried to say “habeas corpus.” Ancient Rome would not have been brought down by barbarians but by poltergeist. But this is not the case.

The Harry Potter series is one of the most popular series of novels in the world today. I don’t really see why, but I’m glad children are reading big thick books they enjoy and I’m glad they’re enjoying fairy stories. I hope it inspires them to move on to better fairy stories. But if reading Harry Potter caused supernatural events to happen in the real world, we would know by now. The Harry Potter series has sold more than 400 million copies, and I presume most of those copies were actually read rather than used to level the coffee table. If that caused demonic activity, we would see a proportionate massive uptick in demonic activity. And I’m not talking about an interview you read with a wrinkly-faced exorcist in a Catholic newspaper; I mean, the secular world would have caught on as well. A large body of people would have observed some kind of preternatural event by now that hadn’t been noticed prior to 1997. Psychiatrists would be writing to medical journals about the weird new cases of psychosis and pea soup vomiting they’d only observed in children who read Harry Potter books. Parenting magazines would run sensational stories about what to do if your child accidentally kills somebody with a magical curse. Emergency Rooms would be treating children who fell off of flying broomsticks. Something.

And yet, this is not the case either.

The logical implication is that the Harry Potter books don’t do that.

There are plenty of places the devil is present and working in the world today, and it’s in the interest of the Catholic educator to recognize this. We need to arm our children to be light for the real world. Teach them to love God through the sacraments, through prayer and through loving their neighbor as themselves, and to revere life from conception until natural death. That would be a start. And then, when Catechism class is over, they can go to the school library and pick out a nice book to read for fun. I recommend Coraline or something from the Dalemark Quartet. But there’s no reason it can’t be Narnia or the Harry Potter series or The Baby-Sitters’ Club. As long as it isn’t The Plant that Ate Dirty Socks. Anything but The Plant that Ate Dirty Socks.

The whole essence of the Satanic Panic and everything that echoes from it is deeply superstitious. Superstition is not Catholic, and it ought not to be taught in Catholic schools.

(image via Pixabay)

Steel Magnificat runs almost entirely on gratuities. To tip the author, go to our donate page here.

Public face of Catholicism

Previous Post

September 2, 2019

Pretending Not to Look

Next Post

September 4, 2019 Fear is Not a Virtue, and Fairy Tales are Harmless

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the youngest son of Jacob?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dan Joseph Benjamin Levi