Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
My First Reaction to the Official Trailer for “It’s a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood”

My First Reaction to the Official Trailer for “It’s a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood”

Last updated on: July 29, 2019 at 1:16 pm by Mary Pezzulo

My First Reaction to the Official Trailer for “It’s a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood” 2019-07-29T13:16:34-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have made no secret of the fact that I am a huge fan of Mr. Rogers. Fred McFeely Rogers was a marvelous educator, a heroic American, and, in my opinion, a saint. I am fully prepared to love a feature film all about Mr. Rogers. Or at least I was, before I saw the trailer.

In case you haven’t heard, Tom Hanks is playing the part of Mr. Rogers in A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, coming to theaters this Thanksgiving. This week, Sony released the trailer, which you can watch here.

We all know you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover; I don’t know that one can adequately judge a movie by its trailer, either. But based on what I’m seeing, I’m not impressed.

First of all, Hanks is notably not doing a Mr. Rogers accent. He’s not even trying to do a Mr. Rogers accent. He’s just speaking extremely slowly, every third word with a weird Southern affectation and the other two words normal. And yes, part of the mystery of Fred Rogers’s manner of speaking was how he’d speak in what counts as neutral vanilla un-accented English for Americans most of the time, and then every so often land on a clinker that was so weird as to give you vertigo. That’s how you speak Pittsburgh, yinz. But the devil is in the details and not a single detail of Hanks’s performance sounds like Pittsburgh or Fred Rogers.

It’s not as though we don’t have ample footage of Mr. Rogers talking. His program was on the air for thirty years. Besides watching it daily when I was little, I watched Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood multiple hours a day for nearly seven years in the past decade, until Rosie finally outgrew it; we have an Amazon Prime membership, and they have almost all the episodes for free with the PBS Kids add-on. I still watch it myself from time to time because I find it soothing. I have spent an awful lot of time listening to that accent. I’m not an excellent mimic, but I could tell you a thing or two about the weird diphthong Mr. Rogers used when pronouncing the double “o” in “good,” “wood,” and “neighborhood.” I could identify the odd scratchiness in the vowel and ending consonant sound of “fish,” which he said at least once per episode as he pretended to pour food into his aquarium from an empty plastic cylinder. I remarked how he said “a tall” when he actually meant “at all,” and how the puppets he voiced did the same thing. Someone trained in acting ought to be able to sit down in front of Mr. Rogers for a few hours and start doing the same things. Instead, Tom Hanks has opted to speak like a halfhearted Forrest Gump.

I’m also disturbed that Hanks seems to be portraying Mr. Rogers as if he was stupid.

I could be wrong. It might just be a bad trailer. I’m watching two and a half minutes out of a feature-length movie and trying to surmise how a character is being played. But it seems as though Mr. Rogers is being characterized as a simple fellow with a heart of gold and a lot of homespun folksy wisdom.

Mr. Rogers was not stupid. He was an extremely intelligent, eccentric man who graduated magna cum laude in music composition and worked as a floor director on NBC for years before discovering his knack for puppets. Then he attended the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary and the University of Pittsburgh’s Graduate School of Child Development, where he worked with the famous child psychologist Margaret McFarland. His unique manner of speaking on television was something he developed on purpose in order to communicate complicated, sometimes scary truths effectively and gently to the youngest, most vulnerable audience. His mannerisms weren’t quirkiness but a deliberate technique. And it worked. Mr. Rogers’s Neighborhood didn’t become so popular and influential because it was the work of a sincere, eccentric rube with a heart of gold. It did so because Mr. Rogers was an eccentric man with a heart of gold, a great deal of talent and the intellect and expertise to use these gifts to educate and heal children.

Tom Hanks is very good at playing Tom Hanks. I enjoy watching Tom Hanks play Tom Hanks. I don’t think I’m going to enjoy watching Tom Hanks play Tom Hanks playing a yokel from South of the Mason-Dixon who was actually a brilliant man from Pennsylvania.

I hope I’m just mistaken.

But I should be counting my blessings; it’s a million times more promising than the trailer for Cats.

(image by David Pinkerton, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood

Previous Post

July 24, 2019

A Lesson for Lunch: What do School Lunch Debts Teach our Children?

Next Post

July 26, 2019 A Different Sort of Ghost Story

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the Israelites eat in the wilderness for 40 years?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Manna Locusts Quail Bread