Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Something Rotten in the Diocese of Arlington

Something Rotten in the Diocese of Arlington

Last updated on: August 23, 2018 at 10:04 pm by Mary Pezzulo

Something Rotten in the Diocese of Arlington 2018-08-23T22:04:49-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today, on Twitter, the Diocese of Arlington posted an extremely optimistic tweet, which led to a strange dialogue. The dialogue was full of guarded, qualified, slippery statements which have me extremely concerned. I am going to post screengrabs of the tweets and then transcripts underneath for anyone who can’t see them clearly.

The diocese started off with “We are committed to protecting our children. And you should know that there is no priest and will never be such a priest in ministry who has committed such crimes. If you are ever concerned, you gotta let us know,” said Bishop Burbidge said [sic] speaking to Arlingtonyouth DYMs.”

This is a suspicious statement right off the bat. How could the bishop be absolutely sure there was no such priest in ministry who had committed such crimes? How could he possibly be certain there would never, ever be such a priest unless he was planning on never allowing a priest to be in ministry ever again at all? If he was encouraging youth to come forward and let him know their concerns, he must have at least believed in the possibility that there was such a priest “in ministry.” Unless he planned to say “thank you for your concern” and then write off any reports as nonsense.

Then it gets downright scary. A person who goes by the Twitter handle “Cat in the Hat” but somehow shows up in these screenshots my friend took as a bunch of question marks got on and expressed his or her concern to the bishop at once.

“I know for fact that there have been molestations reported to the Diocese of Arlington within the past 20 years, so this is egregious overstatement,” says Cat in the Hat.

All right, anyone can claim they “know for fact” that something is the case on Twitter and that doesn’t necessarily make it so. However it would be surprising if there were NOT any molestations reported to the Diocese of Arlington in the past 20 years. Arlington is a pretty big diocese. 20 years is a pretty long time. One in five girls and one in twenty boys will be a victim of sexual assault in their childhood, whether they’re Catholic or not. Any institution, secular or religious, which is that big spanning that amount of time and involving families with children is going to have some kind of accusations of sexual misconduct hurled in its history; that’s just the terrible world we live in. And more importantly, here’s a concerned person speaking up as the bishop requested.

So how does the diocese respond to the concern? Weirdly.

“Bishop Burbidge was stating that no person in ministry had been credibly accused of sexual abuse. You can read more here… God bless you.”

No, he wasn’t stating that. He stated that there is not a priest in the diocese and never will be in the diocese in the future who has committed such crimes. Not that one hasn’t been credibly accused yet; he said there simply wasn’t one. And that qualifier “credibly” is worrying because it suggests that the diocese knows full well that Cat in the Hat is telling the truth, so they want to gaslight them by claiming there were not-quite-credible accusations. Accusations that needed more backing up. Accusations that had been investigated and found to be false. Accusations that everyone refused to believe because the priest was such a nice guy. Some kind of in-credible accusations. The bishop just stated that there was no such priest, not that there had been no credible accusations.

Cat in the Hat wasn’t done, though. “And that is untrue. The diocese confirmed the case of which I am speaking. Why is the bishop being dishonest about this?”

And the diocese, speaking in public on Twitter for the world to see, didn’t deny what Cat in the Hat said.

Roman Catholic Church

transparency

youth

Previous Post

August 22, 2018

The Lesson of the Slim White Disc

Next Post

August 25, 2018 Gentleness Has No Gender

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why were the plagues significant against Egyptian beliefs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Each plague targeted an Egyptian god They were meant to test Pharaoh’s patience Pharaoh had offended the Hebrew people They were random acts of nature