Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Chastity, Incels, And Good Catholic Men

Chastity, Incels, And Good Catholic Men

Last updated on: May 1, 2018 at 3:09 pm by Mary Pezzulo

Chastity, Incels, And Good Catholic Men 2018-05-01T15:09:53-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

They didn’t think of them as rape jokes, but that’s what they were.

I once overheard two men joking about a pair of young ladies they’d fancied, both of whom left college for a convent. The men started fantasizing aloud, as if it was the most natural thing in the world, about storming the gates of the convent to carry the women away before it was too late and they’d taken that vow of chastity. They joked about God having no business taking pretty girls to be His brides, religious sisters, instead of taking only unattractive ones and leaving the attractive ones for them.

They didn’t seem to notice that they were joking about dragging women away from the place they’d voluntarily gone in order to fulfill their vocations as women of God, so that they could marry and have sex with them against their will to fulfill their perceived vocations as men of God.

They didn’t seem to notice that they were talking about God as if He was another horny man, stealing their potential girlfriends away.

There was no talk about what the women wanted.

It was just a joke, yes. These particular men wouldn’t have ever done something like that. But there was no perception that their joke was as tasteless as any other kind of rape joke.

This is why I wasn’t surprised to read, despite what one would hope, and despite the PR – that sexual harassment and assault are as common there as anywhere else and seem to be swept under the rug. When men regard women as objects for their fulfillment, whether they use God as an excuse or not, this is bound to happen. When a man honestly thinks he’s entitled to a woman, this is the result. It’s unchaste, it’s disgusting, it’s sinful and violent in the extreme, and it’s in no way the victim’s fault. It’s what happens when a man believes that women are for him, rather than human beings equal to him with unique lives and vocations of their own. It doesn’t matter if the man calls himself an incel and complains on reddit or harasses women with fantasies about God’s will. It’s the same thing.

Using the language of Catholicism will not save you, if you still regard your neighbor as an object for your satisfaction.

I’m going to be absolutely frank here, to the Catholic men reading this: I don’t think there’s such a thing as a vocation “to marriage” in the abstract. If God calls you to the married life, then your vocation is to one specific person: not to “a marriage” but to manifesting the awesome self-sacrificing love of God to one person in a uniquely specific way– and you’ll know which person that is, in part, because she’ll feel the call from God to love you in that specific way. There will be no mistake on her part that you’ll have to correct by harassing her. Nor is it funny to joke about harassment- much less “carrying off”- that you don’t plan to commit. God will not be stealing from you if the lady you like decides to enter a convent instead– or to go to medical school or run for congress or anything else, for that matter. Your vocation is not to find “a bride,” any bride who’s finally going to give you that sweet sex you’ve been waiting for. It’s to live your life chastely as a single person, missing no opportunity to love your neighbor as another self, until such time if any that God arranges for you to run into your soul mate whom you will love in a unique way. And yes, that will most likely eventually lead to sex, but if your goal is sex first and foremost you’re making a mistake. Women are not for you, to satisfy yourself. Women are for themselves and for their Creator in the same way you are. They don’t cease to be themselves because you fancy them or feel you’ve got a calling from God. Not even after you’re married.

Saving sex for marriage is not the cure for the kind of entitled, spoiled man who calls himself an incel. Indeed, saving sex for marriage is not in itself chastity, depending on the way you regard your female neighbor while you’re avoiding sex. Chastity is of the heart, not the genitals.

People are not objects for your satisfaction. Begin by learning this, and you might become chaste.

(Image via Pixabay)

Franciscan University of Steubenville

heresy

human dignity

laity and lay vocations

misogyny

personal beliefs

Public face of Catholicism

Franciscan University

Previous Post

April 28, 2018

Christ the Vine and the Secret Garden

Next Post

May 1, 2018 On the Death of Alfie Evans

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote the letter to the Hebrews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Peter Paul Unknown