Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Modesty, Edification and a Cheap Church Poster

Modesty, Edification and a Cheap Church Poster

Last updated on: July 12, 2017 at 2:13 pm by Mary Pezzulo

Modesty, Edification and a Cheap Church Poster 2017-07-12T14:13:06-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

dolls-1099228_640

Sometimes I see something online that leaves me puzzled the whole rest of the day.

Today, it was a photograph of a poster that was hung in a church foyer; at the top were those oddly sentimental line drawings of effeminate angels bowing their heads to a monstrance emblazoned with the words ADORATION REPARATION. I don’t know why I get nervous when I hear “reparation.” I suppose it reminds me of my time on the Planet Charismatic, when I honestly thought God deliberately sent pious people bad cases of tuberculosis so that they could “offer it up.” But I’m the last person to blame my crotchets on the designers of random religious clip art.

But that wasn’t what confused me; what had me scratching my head was the text. It said:

Out of respect to Our Lord and for the edification of our neighbor, we beg women and girls to appear in church modestly dressed. Slacks, shorts, sleeveless and low cut dresses do not meet the norm of Christian modesty. Your cooperation is evidence of your love for Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament and respect for the House of God.

Holy Moly.

First of all, what kind of grammar is that? It’s a very short statement; it could have been copy-edited six times in five minutes. Who says “respect to Our Lord” instead of “respect for Our Lord?” Why isn’t there a dash between “low” and “cut?” Wouldn’t it be ten times clearer to write “Slacks, shorts, and sleeveless or low-cut dresses” instead of “slacks, shorts, sleeveless and low-cut dresses?”

What does “edification of our neighbor” mean? Who’s going to be edified by what women wear to cover their backsides, unless they wear skirts made of pages from the McGuffey Reader? It reminds me of when I was making a vain attempt to fit in at FUS, and was told that if anyone said a swear word I should say “That is not edifying to the Body.” I didn’t know what it meant then. I don’t know what it means now. I think if my neighbor wants to be edified, he should stop looking at women and read a book– or even a blog post. I can recommend some lovely ones.

I guess I feel happy that they’re “begging” women to wear modest clothing. At the traditionalist church downtown, they coldly require it, and that always irks me.

The use of the word “slacks” led to quite a discussion among my friends. I had rarely heard anyone but traditionalists refer to women’s trousers as “slacks.” It sounded like one of those affected words from the Saint Joseph Baltimore Catechism. I took an informal poll of my friends on Facebook, to see if anyone other than modesty posters ever referred to women’s trousers as “slacks.” Several friends chimed in that their octogenarian grannies did. I was fast becoming convinced that “slacks” was an archaism like calling every women’s shirt a “blouse,” but I was mistaken. Some friends from the Midwest call women’s dress pants “slacks” and call all women’s shirts “blouses” as well. Once of the Midwestern slack-sayers was a female Episcopal priest, so certainly not influenced by the Saint Joseph Baltimore Catechism in any way. Perhaps the Midwest is always a few generations behind on changing vocabulary trends. Maybe in twenty years we’ll all be speaking Nadsat, but in the Midwest they’ll speak crisp and perfect English. That would be fun. But I digress.

“Slacks, shorts, sleeveless and low cut dresses do not meet the norm of Christian modesty.” This casually implies that there is a single norm of Christian modesty to which we can all adhere, which is nonsense. Amish people are Christians, and Amish women wear bonnets because bare hair is immodest to them; however, I’ve seen lots of pictures of Amish girls playing sports barefoot. In certain Asian countries where feet are considered erotic, you can be sure that a good Christian would modestly keep her feet shod in public, but wouldn’t wear a bonnet. There are Christian sects who view bright colors as deeply immodest, and then there are certain Orthodox women who never go to Liturgy without wearing a colorful scarf. You can easily find strict groups of Evangelicals who think women should wear their hair down around their shoulders in a tangled mess; they even think this is what Saint Paul is talking about. There is no norm for Christian modesty.

And then there’s that zinger of a last line. “Your cooperation is evidence of your love for Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament and respect for the House of God.” If I ever become a debt collector, I’m going to end all my notices with that very phrase.

Okay, so I don’t like the poster.

I wish there was one set of rules for how a man or woman definitively ought to dress in Liturgy or Adoration. I wish there was. I wish loving our Lord and respecting the House of God was a matter of putting on a certain dress. If the priest from my church handed the whole congregation white cassocks with tacky choir collars we were required to wear to Liturgy every Sunday, I would be relieved. But he hasn’t.

Here’s a better idea than policing other people’s clothing: police your own heart. I won’t say “rend your hearts, not your garments,” because somebody’s already said that. But rend your heart with repentance before you go to Liturgy or Adoration. Don’t be dramatic about it, and don’t try to conjure up a nice miserable feeling or anything like that. But take some time before Liturgy to think about how much God loves you, and about the ways you haven’t responded well to that love. Repent of your sins, resolve to do better, make peace with your neighbor if applicable. See where God directs you. Maybe God will direct you in how you’ve been thinking wrongly about clothing. Maybe He does want you to edify your neighbor by covering your chest. But perhaps He wants you to know that you’re not responsible for the fact that your neighbor won’t stop leering. It could be that He’d like you to stop obsessing over clothes and just wear the first dress or suit you pull out of your closet until you learn not to care about appearances so much. It could be that He wants you to stop making yourself late for church by preening too long in front of the mirror– or, He could let you know that you’re being too hard on yourself and you’re allowed to have fun dressing up.

I can’t say where God will direct your heart, any more than I can say what you should wear to church.

Wherever it is, I think it will be much more edifying than staring at women’s clothing.

(image via Pixabay)

Previous Post

July 9, 2017

How To Write A Listicle

Next Post

July 11, 2017 A Summertime Tin Cup Rattle

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What gift did the wise men NOT bring?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Silver Frankincense Myrrh Gold