Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Does Texting Cause Adultery? Relevant Magazine Has The Answer

Does Texting Cause Adultery? Relevant Magazine Has The Answer

Last updated on: February 28, 2017 at 10:49 pm by Mary Pezzulo

Does Texting Cause Adultery? Relevant Magazine Has The Answer 2017-02-28T22:49:14-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

According to a certain school of chastity education, apparently, it’s standard practice to claim two dissimilar things are alike and then move on. Professor Carter teaches interpersonal communication, so he could probably tell you all about it. I am not a communications expert; I can only tell you that it annoys me.

In any case, Professor Carter’s thesis is that texting with a member of the opposite sex is a near occasion of sin. He seems to believe that texting is somehow a more private, intimate, secretive medium than email or a spoken telephone conversation, to say nothing of those lewd chat rooms, but he never comes out and states this or says why he thinks it’s the case. He is adamant that a texted conversation is the devil’s playground, however.

Unfortunately, there is a false sense of security that exists in cell-phone text messaging: It almost always feels as though the words sent and received in a text will not venture into dangerous open waters. The reality is a text message is open water. There is no shallow end to stand on or wall to grab onto. What is sent and received in a text-based world can easily trigger our deepest, darkest feelings and desires, surfacing them in a conversation that began harmlessly.

I was so surprised at this that I thought back over the texts I’d sent in the past month. “Do we need anything from Wal Mart?” doesn’t sound like it would arouse the passions, unless the recipient was quite hungry, but that covers about fifty per cent of the texts I send.

I cannot tell you how many times I’ve heard stories of married men and women texting outside their marriage with the opposite sex and it began innocently, discussing topics about their kids’ school or their spouse’s new job, and then all of a sudden finding themselves in a heated conversation about how their spouse doesn’t want to talk about their feelings or that they noticed the other at the gym, commenting on how they like their tight-fitting gym clothes.

How who likes their tight-fitting gym clothes? Are we talking about a man texting “I like my tight-fitting gym clothes” to his neighbor’s wife, or do we mean the same man texting “I like your tight-fitting gym clothes?” If it’s the former, I wouldn’t suspect that he meant it as flirtation. And if it’s the latter, I’m going to get a restraining order, because he’s apparently been stalking me at the gym. Of course, if he’s stalking me at the gym, the gym would be an excellent place to arrange a tryst in person without texting about it. It’s very unlikely that such a couple would even bother with a text.

In other words, Professor Carter, I have a feeling that you can’t tell us how many times you’ve heard of this because the answer is zero.

The good professor goes on to undermine his whole argument by admitting the flaws:

Let’s be honest: Many married men and married women text the opposite sex without ever falling into this trap. There are many who respect their spouses completely, stewarding well their texts, never venturing into discussing feelings or sex with the opposite sex in a text.

But I think the slope is too slippery to ignore; these individuals walk it like a tightrope, sometimes without even knowing it. Text messaging itself is not the culprit. The culprit is the heart of the person text messaging.

And that’s where your argument breaks down, Professor Carter, because I could insert just about any verb at all into that bit and have it be equally true. Any verb, from “being in a chat room” to flossing. Here, I’ll show you:

Let’s be honest: Many married men and married women floss their teeth without ever falling into this trap. There are many who respect their spouses completely, stewarding well their floss, never venturing into discussing feelings or sex with the opposite sex while flossing.

But I think the slope is too slippery to ignore; these individuals walk it like a tightrope, sometimes without even knowing it. Dental hygiene itself is not the culprit. The culprit is the heart of the person flossing his teeth.

It’s kind of fun; let’s do another.

Let’s be honest: Many married men and married women light their farts on fire without ever falling into this trap. There are many who respect their spouses completely, stewarding well their farts, never venturing into discussing feelings or sex with the opposite sex in a fart.

But I think the slope is too slippery to ignore; these individuals walk it like a tightrope, sometimes without even knowing it. Setting fire to farts itself is not the culprit. The culprit is the heart of the person farting.

The point is, anything is an occasion of sin if you have a dirty mind. But the normal, mature and self-controlled grown-up can navigate ordinary social situations without committing infidelity. A grown man or woman can and should have friendships, cordial inter-personal and business relationships and such in person, online and over the phone without it turning into adultery. If you feel tempted to brag about your tight gym shorts to your neighbor’s wife in a text message, the problem is not the text message any more than it was the chat room. It’s you.

Next, things get surreal, because Professor Carter’s got some advice.

– Avoid giving your phone number to the opposite sex. If it is necessary to keep in touch with them, have your spouse give their number to them.

To me, this is one of those telltale warning signs that your friend is a victim of domestic violence– she won’t give out her own phone number, but only that of her husband. Chilling.

– If you already have someone of the opposite sex’s phone number, treat it as just that: a phone number (not a text number).

– If you receive a text message from someone of the opposite sex, choose to respond by calling them immediately instead of responding through text. Making a phone call communicates to them that you would prefer speaking over the phone instead of via text.

Again with the assumption that it’s impossible to have an adulterous conversation by speaking audibly. When in actuality it’s quite easy. Has Professor Carter never heard of phone sex? It was popular before texting, Professor. Back in the 90s when people were scared stiff of chat rooms.

– Treat your private email like you would a text message. It’s understandable that you might not be legally permitted to Cc your spouse on a work email to the opposite sex, but when you are communicating from your private email with the opposite sex, copy your spouse. This provides transparency between you and your spouse and also communicates to the opposite sex your desire to keep communication public.

“It’s understandable that you might not be legally permitted to Cc your spouse on a work email to the opposite sex, but…” implies that if you are legally permitted, you should. As if people can’t even have a job without being in danger of a steamy workplace affair.

– If you are feeling an emotional or sexual pull to a particular opposite sex member, especially during text messaging, immediately stop. In person, let this individual know your desire to respect your spouse, even with text messages. Confess this behavior to your spouse, repent and begin the healing process. If you don’t stop, the emotional and/or sexual detachment from your spouse will continue to broaden as you continue in communication with the opposite sex person. Please stop.

All this work because you felt sexually attracted for a moment? Confessing to your husband every time you have sexual feelings? I’d say that’s Puritanical, but the Puritans actually managed to live together in community as men and women for quite some time; they even controlled England for a spell. They would never had had time to do that if they spent this much time obsessing over interpersonal communication. You’re beyond a Puritan, Goodman Carter.

Maybe we all need to set down our phones and go out for some fresh air. After we’ve liked, shared and tipped our bloggers, I mean. But do be careful. There are human beings outdoors– real ones, with bodies and sex drives and restrictive gym clothes. We might have to grow up, and learn a thing or two about interpersonal communications. If only there was a professor to teach us how.

(image via Pixabay)

Interpersonal Communications

Previous Post

February 27, 2017

How Do You Ask Forgiveness?

Next Post

March 1, 2017 The First Station: Jesus is Condemned to Death

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who did God call to lead the Israelites out of Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Joseph Aaron Moses