Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Some Pre-Election Thoughts to Carry With You Into The Months Ahead

Some Pre-Election Thoughts to Carry With You Into The Months Ahead

Last updated on: November 11, 2016 at 7:28 pm by Michael Pezzulo

Some Pre-Election Thoughts to Carry With You Into The Months Ahead 2016-11-11T19:28:39-04:00 Michael Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For over a century, the best response to Plato’s critique of democracy has been John Dewey’s claim that precious and fragile democratic experiments must put a premium on democratic statecraft (public accountability, protection of rights and liberties, as well as personal responsibility, embedded in a fair rule of law) and especially on democratic soulcraft (integrity, empathy, and a mature sense of history). For Plato, democratic regimes collapse owing to the slavish souls of citizens driven by hedonism and narcissism, mendacity and venality. Dewey replies that this kind of spiritual blackout can be overcome by robust democratic education and courageous exemplars grounded in the spread of critical intelligence, moral compassion, and historical humility. The 2016 election presents a dangerous question as to whether Dewey’s challenge to Plato’s critique can be met.”

Perhaps the most valuable element in this treatment is its emphasis on uniting personal virtues (long the rhetorical darling of right) with pragmatic political ones (long the aspiration of the left).

I would also like to draw your attention to a helpful commentary from Simcha Fischer writing from the single-issue voter perspective. In her Nov 7 article, “I’m a single-issue pro-lifer in a swing state, and I cannot vote for Trump” she writes mostly about simple and realistic attention to your surroundings as a priority over unrealistic attention to what you would like to believe. She addresses the actual process behind pro-life (and not so pro-life) legislation, the involvement of money in politics, Obamacare and those pesky questions about supreme court justices with refreshing realism. As with the other articles, please read all she has to say. But let me especially direct your attention to her analysis of the politic and moral ethos of Trump:

“Let’s talk about the fact that so very many pregnant women who seek abortion say they felt pressured into it. Where could that pressure possibly come from?

Maybe from men who treat them like sex objects. (This is how Donald Trump treats women, past, present, and future.)

Maybe from men who hear that their wife or girlfriend is pregnant and immediately see it as a problem. (This is how Donald Trump treated his wife.)

Maybe because they think they can’t afford to be pregnant and can’t afford to take care of a child. (Donald Trump doesn’t want poor women to have access to free healthcare.)

Maybe because they’re involved with a man who doesn’t feel any need to honor his promises. (Donald Trump is a rich man because he routinely backs out of his promises, refusing to pay contractors and declaring bankruptcy.)

Maybe because they’re living in a culture where men feel that they have a right to push their way into women’s lives, grab whatever they want from women, blame and shame women for anything that happens next, and leave whenever the relationship becomes inconvenient for him. (Donald Trump Donald Trump Donald Trump Donald Trump.)

Women end up having abortions mainly when they feel like they have no other choice: when they feel that their lives and their identities are only worthwhile if they’re more serviceable to people who have power over them.

And I have just described the world that Donald Trump builds around himself, and will continue to build as president.

Just yesterday, Baby Christian Trump said that a reporter’s accusation of sexual aggression isn’t credible because “look at her.” This is how he operates. This is how he sees women: as either pretty enough to be worthy of his sexual onslaught, or as too ugly to be worth anyone’s time.

Women seek abortion for a reason. Donald Trump, and the people who admire him and imitate him, are that reason. Trump has been telling us who he is. Pro-lifers, let’s believe him.”

The most obvious common concern of these articles is that they are all concerned with the ethos of our politics, not merely one piece or other of their content. Each assumes that is not merely one candidate, policy, or social issue or another that deserves our attention, but how these arise from and contribute to our shared moral assumptions and out standards of evaluation. I emphasize here shared, because in a climate so dominated by the desire to silence or overcome the other party – or the member of our own sub-community that thinks differently – what all sides tend to take for granted is likely to be the devilish detail. Too often in recent years it seems that the one thing all sides hold to in our politics is the importance of being on the winning side, regardless of whether or not our ideas and beliefs are in any sense correct or even half-way sane.

These three writers I highlight are united in taking a responsible stand for dealing with our political and electoral situations as they are, not as our prior commitments say they should be. It is deeply disturbing to me that over the past 20-25 years (which, as I am now in my 30s, is about as far as my personal living memory can stretch for politics and news) I have heard, read, and seen a vile trend, one which becomes more dominant each year. A trend to identify not what is said, nor why it is said and certainly not whether it is credible or true, but only who is saying it and whether it feels sufficiently loyal to one’s own imagined side or not. “X is too liberal”, “Y is a conservative shill”, “Oh, who cares about that, I only get my news from Z” – these are not the sort of declarations that arise out of an interest in truth, nor out of any kind of faithfulness to God, to Church, to family, to values, nor to anything else. Mere party loyalty divorced from reasoning and self-criticism is branding, not fidelity.

Out of Crosby, West and Fisher, the one whose viewpoint I would most identify with would probably be West. Which isn’t especially telling as, out of these pieces, West takes the broadest lens and offers the most comprehensive view. In any event, in proper philosopher’s fashion the purpose of this article is not to lead you toward embracing any of their viewpoints, nor mine – but instead to encourage you in the strongest possible terms to take full responsibility for forming your own.

(Image via Pixabay)

presidential election

Previous Post

November 8, 2016

On the 99th Birthday of Dorothy Day

Next Post

November 8, 2016 Bishop Zurek Denounces Anti-Catholic Witness of Pavone

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Isaiah prophesied that a virgin would conceive and bear a son called Jesus.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE