Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Fr. Pavone Writes Back

Fr. Pavone Writes Back

Last updated on: October 18, 2016 at 7:59 am by Michael Pezzulo

Fr. Pavone Writes Back 2016-10-18T07:59:10-04:00 Michael Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

road-sign-464664_1280

(Image via Pixabay.)

Apparently, a few days ago when Mary attempted to draw Fr. Pavone’s comment on his unfortunate (and presumably unintended) suggestion that rape does not matter, because opposing rape won’t end abortion, she placed her article on more than one of Fr. Pavone’s social media threads. He apparently never noticed that, when he did reply on the original thread,we also responded, for what we had assumed was the final time.

If he never noticed, that would explain his apparent consternation when he tagged Mary on social media last night demanding that she again respond to his comments, with no apparent knowledge of our original reply, still visible on the original thread. Also on the original thread are the false and arrogant accusations of some of Fr. Pavone’s followers that Mary and I are guilty of abortion (we aren’t, for the record, and disagreeing with Fr. Pavone does NOT suggest that we are) and the rather convincing rebuttals to Fr. Pavone views offered by Scott Eric Alt. Scott was, in fact, more on point to offer rebuttal than I was to offer a more meandering conversational response, but I prefer to discuss rather than fight. (If I sound like I am fighting here, I won’t dispute you, but I don’t have to like it.)

Fr. Pavone writes:

I responded to you. Did the article you link to get updated with my response? Now fairness and kindness would require that, would they not? Or should we go viral that this is an unfair attack referencing an outdated and inaccurate article?

Since Mary has asked me to field this on behalf of both of us, and my remarks are a bit lengthy for facebook I am responding here and placing a link there.

Fr. Pavone, I am sure that, if you wanted to, you could have read my response to your reply on the other thread. In any event, Scott Eric Alt very effectively rebutted your arguments there, so I am not sure my earlier reply adds anything substantial to his rebuttal. Nonetheless, as you now seek another reply, I will reply again.

I did not realize that when my wife originally sought your comment there she had also posted here. I talked to her about it and also asked her about the reference to “fraud” above. The attempt to solicit your response here was made prior to your rather unconvincing remarks on the other thread. Our further reply was posted there.

Since that didn’t satisfy you and you are now approaching her five days later for further remark, you are speaking to me. If you had a public argument with my wife in person and then came to our door five days later, I assure you that you would also be speaking to me. Since this is a written medium, she has reviewed what I have written and assures me that in this instance I speak for us both.

That said- if you dispute that you are a “fraud”- well and good. I spoke with Mary, this turn of phrase was ill-chosen- it represents not an intended accusation, but was typed in utter shock. Shock that you – a man she had thought of more integrity than your recent statements seem to suggest- would continue to advocate for Trump while blowing off his indisputably horrid comments about grabbing women. She honestly didn’t expect you to suggest that rape and sexual assault simply don’t matter because you see the self-reported assailant as useful in the struggle to end abortion.

You did later clarify you didn’t mean that, but you haven’t retracted your early statements–statements which we and many others still find disturbingly suggestive.

What you don’t dispute is that you want us to vote for a man who is on the record as boasting that because he is wealthy and powerful he can get by with sexual assault. You want us to believe that since this same man has changed- despite having boasted during his campaign that he could “shoot somebody on 5th avenue” – and no longer has the same attitudes he expressed when he boasted of sexual assault.

You seem to expect that he is magically going to save us all from abortion and other evils because he says that to you privately. This same man is known the world over for not keeping his word in situation after situation.

Say what you like, go on the record as you like, but don’t expect your roman collar and your personal sense of conviction to persuade everyone else you are correct. We at Steel Magnificat are not going to back down on several things.

We believe that rape is wrong (and by extension sexual assault is wrong, and that for the same reasons that rape is wrong). We believe that boasting that you can get by with committing crimes is wrong. We believe that Trump’s public record of flip-flopping and contradictory statements on abortion is a more reliable indicator of his attitude towards abortion than anything he may or may not have said to you privately.

We also don’t believe you when you try to convince us that when we re-iterate that rape and sexual assault are wrong we somehow secretly mean to say that abortion isn’t wrong. Believe it or not, what we meant by that, was that rape is wrong.

Furthermore, when we say that we find Trump’s record of dishonesty a convincing account of his intentions and character, we mean to say exactly that. That is not a statement about Hilary Clinton, nor an endorsement her attitudes toward abortion. We are, in fact, Catholics. We happen to believe that Hilary Clinton is wrong about abortion. If that shocks you, so be it.

The most repulsive statement you have made is the suggestion that Trump’s “beautiful family” makes his boasting about getting by with sex crimes okay or irrelevant. I am sure you don’t believe that being “beautiful” as human beings see somehow makes crimes acceptable. Surely non-white, non-wealthy families (such as many non-Trump families) – families that may not immediately strike you as “beautiful,” are also precious in the eyes of God, just as Trump’s is?

We are not backing down on our implied claim that any beauty on the part of Trump or his family does not – in any way, shape or form- excuse his boasting of crimes nor his record of lying. Nor is it likely to end abortion, nor likely to in any way, shape or form change the causes of abortion, nor likely to bring about a culture of life where abortion won’t seem, to many, to be a better choice than meeting the actual needs of women and supporting the freedom of women. In short, Donald Trump does not convince us that the need to honor human dignity and reshape our culture in accord with that honor will actually be met by your trolley-problem-style zeal for supporting Mr. Trump.

You may consider this our agreement to disagree.

You may share this with your audience as you see fit. I ask only that you do as we did, and link any quotations, however unfavorably presented, back to their source. In this way, your readers may form their own opinions, as we expect our readers to do.

As we have, for our part, agreed to disagree, if you have any future problems with Steel Magnificat, kindly address them through the mediation of our channel editor.

If you have any future problem with my wife, please content yourself with sharing your peculiar interpretation of the gospel’s demands with those who wish to hear it. And leave her alone.

abortion

babies

catholic conspiracy alarmism

Catholic Oppositional Disorder

presidential election

Previous Post

October 17, 2016

We Hope Our Readers Will Enjoy This Fox News Story

Next Post

October 18, 2016 CFS From a Bystander's Viewpoint

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the oldest man recorded in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Adam Jared Noah Methuselah