So What Is Good Art, Anyway? Part 2

Last updated on: April 15, 2016 at 10:07 am by Mary Pezzulo

So What Is Good Art, Anyway? Part 2 2016-04-15T10:07:34-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

gogh.12-sunflowers

Days ago I inadvertently knocked over a powder keg with my frustrated rant about bad Christian art. Apparently a lot of people agree with me, as that rant has been shared more than any of my other much better posts. And in the comments on these shares, I’ve seen many people asking questions. What should we do? How should we change? What is art, anyway? Isn’t it subjective? Who gets to decide what art is good and what art is bad? These are fantastic questions; I’ve already mentioned that I love talking about art and the study of aesthetics. Up until this point I never met anyone who enjoyed hearing about art half as much as I enjoyed talking about it. Now that I’ve got your attention, I would like to take some cursory answers to these questions and expand on them. Yesterday I gave one answer as to how you can objectively know if art is good or bad: that good art does what it’s supposed to do and bad art doesn’t do what it’s supposed to do. I was speaking in the context of Christian devotional art which, whatever else it does, is meant to speak about Christ and set the mood for prayer. Today, I want to talk about three characteristics found in good art, the exclusion of which definitely makes art bad.

First of all, good art shows us new perspectives. If I look at a sunflower, I know what it’s like to be myself, looking at a sunflower. If I look at one of Van Gogh’s famous paintings of sunflowers, I’m learning what it’s like to be Van Gogh, looking at a sunflower. Someone else– someone who lived long ago, who spoke a different language from me and struggled with mental issues different from my own, is holding up a sunflower and showing it to me from his own viewpoint. I have a new perspective on how to feel about sunflowers, about how they look and about how they make someone feel. I have a new view of the nature of what it is to be alive, to be a temporary thing that is going to die quickly, and even about the color yellow and different colors that can be mixed with yellow. Bad art doesn’t show any new perspective. It might portray a subject badly, or it might take the easy way out and portray exactly what the artist thinks people would like to see, rather than his own unique perspective in a clear and interesting way. A bad artist does not help me to see a sunflower differently, and he doesn’t tell me what it’s like to be a different person seeing a sunflower. My vision stops at the portrayal of the sunflower. It may be pretty in its way, but there’s nothing to ponder and nothing new to learn.

Good art expresses that which is more universal, through a particular instance. That’s a fancy way of saying that good art displays one specific thing or a few specific things– one landscape, a few oranges, a cast of characters– so truthfully and so beautifully that it says something about the nature of things in general: the nature of what it is to be a person, of what fruit is, of what a landscape is, of what color and light are. It goes from the specific to the universal and the universal back to the specific. I can learn about what it is to be a man, an ambitious and sinful man, a warrior and a human being from watching a talented actor portray Macbeth. I can learn about myself by watching a fictional character who is not very much like me in some ways, but is in others. Bad art, on the other hand, does not provide a good, solid, concrete particular to lead me to the universal; it doesn’t concern itself with universals at all. To return to beating our dead horse of the week: I can’t learn about myself from watching Grace cry without smearing her makeup in God’s Not Dead 2, because Grace is not a good particular. She has no characteristics to speak of. She’s not a real person, not even a realistic fictional person. The opportunity to learn about human nature in any way is lost. Bad art often attempts to bring us the universal through using many different badly portrayed particulars. Think of any children’s book that presents a “diverse group” of boring characters, one of whom is black, one of whom is white, one of whom is disabled and one of whom is a tomboyish female. The bad artist is attempting to give everyone something to identify with– black children with the black character, tomboyish girls with the tomboyish girl, and so on. A good artist will give us truthful, beautiful and interesting characters that may be different from us in any number of ways, and leads us to learn about humanity through them.

Good art also broadens our empathy. It leads us to put ourselves in others’ shoes and feel for people who are not like us. This is very good just in itself, and it also opens doors for other kinds of good. A person who has never heard of Christ or Mary can look at Michelangelo’s Pieta and feel Mary’s grief. She can begin to suffer with a person she did not previously know existed, because she connects with the compelling portrayal of suffering in the piece of art. Now we’ve opened a door to talk about what the piece of art is about, the story it tells and the things we believe about Christ and Mary. Art is bad insofar as it narrows the opportunity for empathy. This kind of art does not provide a door for conversation except by accident, because nobody wants to talk about it except to mock it, and as much as I like mocking and ranting and making fun of song lyrics, it doesn’t get us very far. Think of the worst religious art you’ve ever seen. Maybe the cartoons in a children’s religion textbook, or a proselytizing tract. The kind of artwork that makes Jesus look like Kenny Loggins. Now contrast that with looking at the Pieta. Looking at the bad art leaves you confused and wanting to mock or dismiss everyone involved; not only can you not empathize with the person depicted, you can’t even empathize with the artist or the person using the image. It becomes extremely difficult to read the book or tract and take it seriously. Empathy, devotion and the chance at hearing out somebody’s ideas have all been squashed by the horrible art.

Good art draws people to think from different perspectives, and about universal things through particulars. It deepens empathy and helps us to open up conversation. Bad art doesn’t inspire thought, it doesn’t teach, it doesn’t open the same doors to conversation and it doesn’t lead us to empathize with one another. These are only some of the major reasons why good art, whether it’s directly to do with Christianity or not, is so important for society and especially for people of faith. There’s far more to say, but we’ll leave it at that for now.

(Image: The Vase With Twelve Sunflowers by Vincent Van Gogh, courtesy of ibiblio.org)

Previous Post

April 14, 2016

So What is Good Art, Anyway?

Next Post

April 18, 2016 Memoir of a Foolish Virgin

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the strongest man in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samson Goliath David Moses