Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
If I Perish, I Perish: In Which The Author Subscribes to Pure Flix

If I Perish, I Perish: In Which The Author Subscribes to Pure Flix

Last updated on: April 21, 2016 at 1:40 am by Mary Pezzulo

If I Perish, I Perish: In Which The Author Subscribes to Pure Flix 2016-04-21T01:40:46-04:00 Mary Pezzulo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The-Book-of-Esther-Christian-Movie-Christian-Film-DVD-Bible-Pure-Flix-3

I was going to review a film I actually expected to like this week, I really was. I was going to go to see The Jungle Book, but then there was a bomb threat at the local mall, the bus route was closed and I didn’t know if the cinema would be showing movies. I’m not making this up. There was a bomb threat, so I’m going to review another bomb.

You see, I’ve apparently typed “pure flix” into my browser one too many times, because I keep getting ads for the Pure Flix streaming service. They offer your standard one month free subscription to their film collection with its dismal promise of “wholesome” and “family friendly” faith-based low-budget films, and also several seasons of that old Claymation gem “Davy and Goliath.” I am a sucker for a free offer of any kind. I realize I should have watched Davy and Goliath, but I deeply love the Biblical story of Esther. I just had to try it.

And I did. Pure Flix kept pitching the ad for this film to me all over my Facebook. I received a free trial of Pure Flix, and watched the film. I will now return the favor by giving Pure Flix and The Book of Esther free publicity.

First of all, The Book of Esther is cheap. It’s one of the cheapest-looking films I’ve ever seen. Every establishing shot is CGI; the rooms of the palace are small and dank with community theater-quality sponge-painting to make the plaster look like stone. The costumes are noticeably taken from a ready-made costume shop as well, and they are not at all historically accurate. Most of the king’s advisers wear vintage Ancient Roman garb, Queen Esther’s tiara looks like a piece worn by Princess Kate, and she’s adorned in fabrics from the Jo-Anne’s upholstery department. King Xerxes is, in certain scenes, actually wearing a rosary. The crucifix has been replaced by a large brooch, but the chain is recognizably a rosary: ten glassy beads, a length of brass chain, a single bead, a length of brass, ten beads. The earnest Protestants at Pure Flix must have found it in the costume shop and not known what it was, unless they’re making some kind of subtle claim that Catholics are actually a kind of Persian Zoroastrian offshoot.

I don’t object to a film’s cheapness on its face. Some very inexpensive films turn out well; some high budget films are horrible. I like to see what talented artists can do with a few cheap sets and a box of old costumes. The movie becomes a filmed play of sorts. This could be a kind of Purim-Spiel, a fun romp. Sadly, it’s not. The only way I could enjoy this movie would be if I got too drunk to tell Haman from Moredecai.

The film takes many confusing liberties with the actual Bible story set down in either the Protestant or Catholic accounts. Over half of the king’s advisers are stated to be eunuchs for no reason– said eunuchs are played by men with deep voices and noticeable five o’clock shadow, so it doesn’t work at all. Haman hates Mordecai because Haman had wished his own, plainer daughter to be the king’s wife– wife, not consort, because Xerxes only has one, and he refuses to deflower Esther before their so-called “wedding night.” There is a ludicrous trial where the king allows Mordecai to testify on behalf of the Jewish people, and concludes by declaring that the king of Persia wants everyone to “follow their conscience” instead of obeying the king’s decrees all the time. There is an unintentionally comical sequence wherein God speaks to Esther, addressing her as Hadassah, and Esther can’t for the life of her figure out where the echoing male voice is coming from. It’s a shame, because that was a perfectly good idea for a non-canonical story in a movie about Esther. It could have been downright inspiring with different actors, better directing, a higher costume budget, and perhaps a new key grip, best boy, caterer and clapper loader as well. But it’s the closest thing the film has to a good idea.

Also, it seems that everyone in Persia at the time of King Xerxes was on a paleo diet. At the great feast at the beginning of the film, there are no goat cheeses; there are no stuffed figs, no honey cakes, no rough loaves of flatbread or any of the other traditional prop foods one would expect at a Biblical feast. There is only one sad deflated little prop pot roast, a few bunches of purple grapes and at least seven trays of waxy, grocery store Red Delicious apples. A eunuch munches an apple as he plots with Haman. Vashti eats grapes out of a fruit bowl with several waxy Red Delicious apples at the ready nearby. The feast Esther serves for Xerxes and Haman consists of several trays of Red Delicious apples and the exact same pot roast. I have to go to the bathroom just thinking about all that fruit; I can’t imagine what the actors suffered when filming the actual feast scenes take after take.

Worst of all, that pot roast gives the best performance of the film. Jen Lilley is a lovely woman with a keen talent at making winsome faces for the camera, but she can’t speak a line naturally. Joel Smallbone plays a femme, adolescent, lip-curling parody of a Xerxes. Robert Miano and Thaao Penghlis, as Haman and Mordecai respectively, do not even try to act our their mush-mouthed lines, and as such they’re the most dignified characters. They’re also unspeakably boring.

In short: the whole thing is a ghastly mess. And it’s a shame, too. The Bible’s Book of Esther provides a wonderful story with so much good material. This was a real opportunity to do what people who make films like this claim they would like to do and preach the Bible to non-Christians. Anyone can feel for the Bible’s Esther– a beautiful young woman from a downtrodden minority group forced to hide her identity, coerced into marriage and apparently powerless; then, through pluck and one extremely risky act of calculated provocation, she manages to prevent a genocide and get the bad guy hanged on his own gibbet. People with no interest whatsoever in the Bible could have been drawn to such a story. Pure Flix could have taught them something about God. Instead, we have a warmed-over adult cast production of a Sunday School recital, and that’s the kindest thing I can say about it.

This movie will not appeal to people who like the Bible and are willing to learn from it, either. It’s obviously possible to teach values through a dramatization of a Bible story, and I’m not saying you shouldn’t, but the The Book of Esther offers completely random nuggets of faux Sunday School moralizing in incongruous places with no respect for the text or the Jewish people who are ostensibly the heroes. The real Esther was a consort living in a harem who disliked her life intensely, and stated that she hated her royal crown like a polluted rag. A discussion of the benefits of Christian marriage could have been drawn from her suffering, from the way in which all women are used like livestock in the actual book of Esther. But the Esther of the film is Xerxes’s only wife, becomes so after a chaste engagement, and loves her king with smiling devotion. The thick impasto of another culture’s views on chastity smeared overtop of the sad realities of history smothers any real meaning that could have been found in the text. Xerxes’s historically and textually absurd speech about following one’s conscience makes a mockery of Esther’s actual counter-cultural behavior. Mordecai’s comments about a wife’s duty to obey her husband in all but the gravest of circumstances are such a patronizing aside to the viewing audience, that any chance Esther had to teach a real lesson will not even be noticed.

In any case, Pure Flix has been sending me ads for the Book of Esther since my panning of God’s Not Dead, and I imagine they’ll begin again once I cancel my subscription. I hope they appreciate the results of their ad campaign. And next time I watch and review a film, I promise to watch something I actually expect that my audience might enjoy. If there’s a film you would like me to watch and review for Steel Magnificat, please tell me about it in the comments and I’ll see how many I can get to in the coming weeks.

(Image courtesy of Christianfilmdatabase.com. The still is from The Book of Esther and is used for a review in accordance with Fair Use principles.)

historical inaccuracy

Previous Post

April 20, 2016

The Savior Wears A Mask

Next Post

April 22, 2016 In A Desert Way

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Abuse Advent America American Christianity angel angels Annunciation Appalachia apparition apparition chaser apparition chasers apparition culture art art review babies baby baby Jesus Bad Lip Reading bad statue contest bath beauty Bible story blog blogkeeping blood book review Brandon Sanderson breastfeeding bus Catholic catholic conspiracy alarmism Catholic Oppositional Disorder Charismatic Renewal Charlie the Cat chastity Christ Christian idenitity Christianity and Judaism Chronic Illness clean clothing COD piece comedy compassion conscience conspiracy theory conversion cop-on-black violence Crucifixion cry of the poor culture Daesh Daily Saints death death penalty devotional diaconate diaper diapers dirty disability Donald Trump Dorothy Day dream drugs Eastern Catholicism Eastern Christianity education election election update Elsewhere on Patheos empathy environment Fear feminism film review fish flashback fluffy buns food Franciscan University of Steubenville Friendship Room fun Gabriel gardening gospel hair-splitting Heaven hell heresy Hillary Clinton history Holly the Witch Holy Spirit holy war Homeschooling homosexuality horror human dignity humor Icon idol immigrants infection inter-religious dialogue Interpretation of Scripture Islam Jesus Jihad Joseph joy laity and lay vocations lamb dinner laundry lent lgbtq literature love manners Mary Medicine and Science Meditation mercy mess milk misogyny Missouri monasticism monster motherhood mourn with those mourn movies movis music mystery nature neurodiversity New Pro-Life Movement news nonsense nostalgia O antiphons obituary objectification Ohio Valley Ordinary Time ordination Ordo Amoris parable paradox Passover peanut butter personal beliefs pets philosophy Planet Charismatic poetry politics polls poop Pope Francis Pope Leo power in the Church prayer prayer request prayers preferential option for non-violence president presidential election priest primary private revelation pro-life prophecy Public face of Catholicism Pure Flix Q and A race racism random rape rape. sexuality reader's request Reckoners refugee religious trauma ressurrection Right to life Saints saints and celebrations same-sex same-sex marriage satire scandal secular feasts seder Seven Joys Seven Last Words sex sexual ethics sexuality silencing six months skid row slavery social justice Speculative fiction spiritual abuse spoon stain story suffering suffrage suffragette Sunday Gospel temple Tenebrae Responsories Terror the exorcist The Friendship Room The New Pro-Life Movement Things I Learned on the Internet tin cup traffic true story tv review Uncategorized USCCB vice and temptation violence Virtue virtue and vice war Way of the Cross whimsy whole life women's ordination work of mercy Year A

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

An angel appeared to a priest burning incense in the temple, announcing his wife would bear a son despite her old age. Who was this priest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eli Zechariah Joseph Simeon