After the Fire Can a Modern Spire Inspire?

Last updated on: May 4, 2019 at 2:12 pm by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

After the Fire Can a Modern Spire Inspire? 2019-05-04T14:12:09-05:00 Fr. Dwight Longenecker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Baron Foster of Thames Bank aka Norman Foster is the baron of high tech modernist architects. Foster is famous for the glass and steel Hearst Tower in New York and pickle shaped “Gherkin” that distinguishes the modern London skyline.

Quick off the mark after the Notre Dame fire, Foster enthused that the restoration of the cathedral was a “great opportunity.” His rapidly sketched out design calls for a needle like spire made of “crystal glass and stainless steel” with an observation deck at its base. A new glass roof for the cathedral would allow “natural light to illuminate the space below.”

The good thing about Foster’s plan is that the modernists have come up so quickly with an idea so patently absurd that one hopes all other similar glass and steel solutions will be consigned to a high tech shredder immediately.

What’s dumb about Foster’s ideas? Firstly, is it possible that an architect so eminent can be ignorant of the medieval design of the cathedral? The interior of the great church is capped by stone vaulting. The wooden roof perched above the stone ceiling. Foster’s glass roof could not “allow natural light to illuminate the space below.”

Foster would have to destroy the stone vaulting to allow natural light into the nave. Perhaps he did know about the medieval vaulting. One mustn’t underestimate the modernist’s enthusiasm for wanton destruction.

Imagine If the space were flooded with natural light. The entire ambience of the cathedral would be destroyed. The cool darkness in an ancient church is part of its otherworldliness. The natural light filtering through high windows and changing with the seasons provides a subtle interplay of light and stone. The glorious stained glass windows glitter like supernatural jewels only because the church is in comparative darkness.

Presumably Foster, like most modern architects is driven by that inane dogma “Form follows function.” Yet he seems to have no idea at all what the function of a church like Notre Dame might be. His idea that the roof should include an observation deck indicates his understanding that the church is primarily a tourist attraction. He is not the only one. In a hilariously ignorant headline, an AP writer piously informed us: “Tourist Mecca Notre Dame Also Revered As Place Of Worship.”

Traditionalists have shaken their heads in horror at Foster’s proposal. The idea that the spire should be replaced with a Muslim minaret was even more horrifying.

The traditionalist will plead for a complete and faithful restoration. But wouldn’t this be going to the other extreme? How faithful must the restoration be? Will they build an exact replica? Must they restore the roof using ancient oak beams? Will the spire be a faithful reconstruction of the one destroyed by the fire? Must the oak beams be worked with medieval axes and adzes? Can they use steel scaffolding and an elevator to get up there? May the workers wear helmets and overalls or must they be clad in linen smocks, clogs and eat gruel for their lunch?

You see my point. There is a modernist extremism and a traditionalist extremism. Surely the best way forward is a balance between the old and the new.

To slavishly reproduce the past—as for example in Colonial Williamsburg—may be educational but it is not real. Likewise, to simply build a replica of the medieval Notre Dame would be artificial and dull.

A good architect will use modern materials and methods to devise a roof and spire for Notre Dame which takes advantage of up to date technologies while building a spire that is modern in style, while complementing the rest of the cathedral. The spire should be a graceful and humble accent to the Gothic masterpiece.

The traditionalist will critique such a spire for being too modern. The modernist will criticize it for being a boring replica.

A few years ago in our parish in South Carolina we built a new church in the Romanesque style. When the architect was challenged by one of his peers for simply repeating a worn out and dated style his reply was, “This style of architecture is like a sonnet. It has certain characteristics and disciplines. When you write a sonnet you stay within those boundaries, but your sonnet is original. It may be a Romanesque, but it is our Romanesque.”

The arguments about the Notre Dame spire highlight the deep divide in Western culture between radical, secular progressivism and what I call imaginative conservatism. The progressive is, at heart, an iconoclast. A revolutionary. For him to move forward into the brave new world, the past must be destroyed.

The imaginative conservative looks at the present and the future as an exciting challenge. He faces the future with optimism regarding the past as the foundation for the future. The past not only provides the language, discipline and form. It provides a deep well of experience and inspiration. Working within, and with the tradition, the artist, architect, composer or writer will produce something original.

Let’s hope that the architects charged with the re-building of Notre Dame will be wise and humble enough to submit to the principles of imaginative conservatism. If they do they will produce a spire that may be Gothic but “it will be our Gothic.” If so, the new roof and the new spire will be a modern expression of the ancient beauty.

Follow Dwight Longenecker’s blog, listen to his podcasts, browse his books and be in touch at dwightlongenecker.com

Image: Spire of Salisbury Cathedral, England. Creative Commons.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 4, 2019

T.S.Eliot and C.S.Lewis, Nuns, The Mission and The Creator of All Things...

Next Post

May 8, 2019 The Future Church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Matters Apologetics Architecture Blobble Study Book Reviews Brideshead Caitlin O'Rourke Catholic Art Catholic Culture Church Politics Chust for Nice Contemporary Culture Duane Mandible Ed Blanch Film Reviews Fr Harvey Nicolaitan Frank Viola Mantilla the Hon More Christianity Mrs Brady Catholic Old Lady Mystery of the Magi Norman Anderson Queen Hillary Saints and Supernatural Spirituality The Inklings The Vicar Theology Todd Unctuous Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz