Belgians Vote to Kill Children

Last updated on: December 27, 2014 at 10:21 am by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Belgians Vote to Kill Children 2014-12-27T10:21:34-05:00 Fr. Dwight Longenecker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Belgium already has one of the most aggressive euthanasia laws in the world, and now lawmakers in Belgium have extended permission for euthanasia to children. CNN reports here on a law that allows doctors to take active steps to euthanize older children who consent.

Belgium legalized euthanasia in 2002 for those in “constant and unbearable physical or mental suffering that cannot be alleviated.” Minors were included in the original proposals but were left out of the final legislation for political reasons.

The new bill would extend the “right to die” to those under the age of 18 only under certain strict conditions, including that the child is judged able to understand what euthanasia means. Consent of parents or guardians must also be given.

The CNN reporter then give several examples of the hard cases where parents had to watch their little ones die of a painful and debilitating disease. But hard cases, as they say, make bad law. While it is terrible to watch a child suffer and die slowly, it is also true that modern medical technology allows us to alleviate pain and ease suffering to a remarkable extent. But this is not the real question.

What we are seeing is an extension of a law that gives state authorization to medical killing. They say that consent must be given by the child, but what is consent and at what age can a child be expected to give real consent? Most people–not only a children–being pressured by medical staff and family–will agree to have their life terminated if they are convinced that dying would be the easier way for all.

It is happening already. One pediatrician said,

“Doctors do terminate lives, of children as well as adults,” he said. “But today it is done in, let’s say, a ‘gray zone,’ or in the dark, because it is illegal.”

Other doctors have disagreed:

175 pediatricians signed an open letter Thursday urging more time for reflection before any decision is made.

The letter argues that the law “responds to no real demand” and that most medical teams caring for terminally ill children would recognize that none of their patients has made a spontaneous and voluntary demand for euthanasia.

Meanwhile, medical advances mean that effective palliative care is available and that children do not suffer as they approach death. Extending the “right to die” to minors will only add to the stress and pain of families at a difficult time, it said.

The letter also questions how any objective judgment can be made on a child’s ability to understand what’s at stake.

Most of all what the doctors and lawmakers are missing is rock solid, uncompromising respect for human life. Invariably doctors will make life and death choices, but when active euthanasia is an option the death choices become ever increasingly easy and inevitable.

Once it is determined that it is better for some terminally ill people to die quickly, it becomes irresistible to conclude that all terminally ill people should be euthanized as soon as possible. The idea that terminally ill people will not be pressured to choose euthanasia is naive in the extreme. As soon, therefore, that a terminal illness is diagnosed why not administer the poison, and if this is the right choice, then why should it be voluntary? Indeed, I suspect that in many cases already, where the terminally ill person has no one to defend them, lives are already being quietly snuffed out.

Beneath this brutality is the calm, but chilling face of utilitarianism. Here is a long post on utilitarianism I wrote for the book Disorientation: How to Go to College Without Losing Your Mind Utilitarianism is the philosophy that what is good is what works, or what is efficient at bringing about the greatest good for the greatest number. This shallow, godless philosophy ends up in the killing fields because the utilitarian does not believe in heaven, hell or the afterlife. Therefore why not kill those who are in pain and suffering? For that matter, why not kill the mentally deficient, the physically disabled and the socially unfit?

You can see where it leads: if suffering people can be pulled like weeds, then why not deficient people and if misfits, why not social misfits?

The most chilling thing about all this is that it is done by smiling people who think they are being nice and kind. So they go about creating their new social cleansing with the lawmaker’s vote, the general consensus and the efficient men in white coats.

I’m with Flannery O’Conner and Walker Percy who said, “Tenderness leads to the gas chambers.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 13, 2014

Anglicans Prepare for Same Sex Weddings

Next Post

February 14, 2014 It's a Small World

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Matters Apologetics Architecture Blobble Study Book Reviews Brideshead Caitlin O'Rourke Catholic Art Catholic Culture Church Politics Chust for Nice Contemporary Culture Duane Mandible Ed Blanch Film Reviews Fr Harvey Nicolaitan Frank Viola Mantilla the Hon More Christianity Mrs Brady Catholic Old Lady Mystery of the Magi Norman Anderson Queen Hillary Saints and Supernatural Spirituality The Inklings The Vicar Theology Todd Unctuous Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz