The Bottom Line

Last updated on: October 20, 2010 at 10:48 pm by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

The Bottom Line 2010-10-20T22:48:00-05:00 Fr. Dwight Longenecker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

From time to time I receive an email from a Protestant Christian who is trying to pick a fight with me about this that or the other. Maybe it’s papal infallibility or their idea that Catholics believe in salvation by works, or maybe it’s lighting candles or ‘worship’ of Mary, or maybe it’s indulgences or the Inquisition or some other old chestnut.

Here’s my stock response: “Thank you for your question. I’m afraid I don’t engage in debate with non-Catholics because I find it unfruitful. However, if you would genuinely like to learn more about Catholicism and have open and honest questions I’d be delighted to do my best to answer them. However, there is one topic I am willing to discuss, and it is my question to you: ‘Why should your version of Christianity be the right one and the other thousands be wrong?’

The bottom line is the authority question. Where do we turn for the answers? The Protestant will say, “To the Bible.” But this begs the question. We then have to ask, “But which interpretation of the Bible?” The tens of thousands of Protestant Christian groups and millions of Protestant Christian individuals all say, “To the Bible!” yet they all disagree. So how can that simple and noble answer be correct? Others will cry out, “But if you simply read the Bible and pray for the guidance of the Holy Spirit the clear and simple word of the gospel will be made abundantly clear to you!” Alas, that is what all the other tens of thousands of groups and millions of individuals say, and what they really mean by this is, “The Holy Spirit will reveal to you that I and my group are right and the others are wrong.”

Others will resort to individualistic sentimentality. “You will know in your heart a great and sudden peace!” or “You will have a great joy when you come to finally understand the truth!” How wonderful to have a positive and glowing religious experience, but alas, such things are easily counterfeited not only by self-deceiving wishful thinking, but also by religious charlatans, well meaning religious preachers who sincerely believe the religious experience they are manipulating people into is genuine, and also various forms of synthetic emotion producing chemicals, and when all is said and done the bottom line question still remains, “And how do you know that the emotion you have experienced is a valid emotion and the peace or the joy or the certainty you know in your heart, while powerful and convincing is not fraudulent in some way?”

Linked with this is a similar response: that is a certain and confident ‘inner knowledge’. “I just know that this is right, and I can’t explain it!” cries the enthusiastic believer. While such experiential knowledge is admirable the question still remains, “Yes, but how do you know that your feelings of certainty are based on anything other than wishful thinking or a fleeting emotion or the suggestion of that feeling by a teacher or preacher? Indeed this is a favorite tactic of Mormon missionaries. They say, “Just read the Book of Mormon, and before you do pray to the Holy Spirit and ask him to reveal to you the truth of what your read.” Then, hey bingo! Lot’s of people say, “Its true! I just prayed to the Holy Spirit to reveal the truth of what I read and suddenly my eyes were opened and I understood that it was all true!!” Hogwash.

Finally there is the response which makes appeal to the simple words and concepts of the gospel. “Surely we can leave on one side all these complicated and divisive questions. Isn’t the main thing that we all try to love one another and love Jesus the best we can? Isn’t that really what the simple gospel of the simple carpenter from Nazareth would have wanted?” These are noble and beautiful sentiments, but again they beg the question and evade the difficulties. Apart from the objection that this reduces Christianity to being nice and good, one needs to insist on the necessity of the ultimate question and say, “Yes, but how do you know that you are actually loving Jesus, and not your own fictional version of what you want Jesus to be? How do you know you are not worshiping a Jesus made in your own image? You must have some sort of belief or dogma as well as your good life or how is your life to be distinguished as Christian, and if you have some belief then how do you know it is the one which will lead to your souls salvation?”

This is the bottom line question between Catholics and Protestants, and it is the question that I have never once had even the beginning of a satisfactory answer from a non Catholic. In fact, most often they cannot even seem to understand that it is a necessary or possible question at all.

Without a coherent ecclesiology and a universally agreed, external and infallible authority structure the question cannot be answered and the non Catholic can only resort to subjective sentimentality.

The Catholic answer of an infallible, divinely appointed authority on earth may be difficult to accept, indeed even the suggestion of it will cause scandal and outrage. It may inconceivable for the non-Catholic imagination and may seem awkward and awful in application, but at least it offers a positive and intellectually coherent theory on which an ecclesiology and soteriology can be based.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 19, 2010

St John deBrebeuf and Isaac Joques and Companions

Next Post

October 21, 2010 Must Christianity be Dogmatic?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Matters Apologetics Architecture Blobble Study Book Reviews Brideshead Caitlin O'Rourke Catholic Art Catholic Culture Church Politics Chust for Nice Contemporary Culture Duane Mandible Ed Blanch Film Reviews Fr Harvey Nicolaitan Frank Viola Mantilla the Hon More Christianity Mrs Brady Catholic Old Lady Mystery of the Magi Norman Anderson Queen Hillary Saints and Supernatural Spirituality The Inklings The Vicar Theology Todd Unctuous Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz