Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Loving Supportive Respectful

Last updated on: March 30, 2009 at 9:52 pm   by Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Loving Supportive Respectful 2009-03-30T21:52:00-05:00 Fr. Dwight Longenecker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The abortion crazy Episcopal woman priest says that a woman who is in a ‘loving, supportive, respectful’ relationship wants an abortion she should have one.

Quite apart from the abortion issue, aren’t you sick of this ‘loving, supportive, respectful’ stuff being the criteria for a legitimate ‘partnership’? Forget about marriage. Forget about divorce and re-marriage. Forget about co habitation. Forget about lesbianism or homosexuality or transgendered freakery. Forget about fornication or adultery or the ten commandments. What really matters is if two people are ‘loving, supportive and respectful.’

The first problem with this is that it is so patently upper middle class patronizing nonsense. What on earth does ‘loving, supportive and respectful’ mean? It means that the people are nice people. They are respectable people. They have good taste. They don’t shout at one another and use nasty words. They have good table manners. They don’t eat at McDonald’s. They are educated. They read fat books with long words. They dislike television and go to the opera. They know how to use a salad fork and a butter knife. In other words, they are Episcopalians. 

The second problem is: Who defines what ‘loving, supportive and respectful’ actually means? One couple’s love is another couple’s fistfight. One couple’s ‘support’ is another couple’s agreement to leave each other alone. One couple’s ‘respect’ is another couple’s divorce. 

Third problem is that being ‘loving, supportive and respectful’ is not even necessarily human, and doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with marriage at all. My daughter loves her hamster. I support the chickadees on my bird feeder and I respect my mailman because he delivers the mail in the sleet and snow. Big deal.

Fourth problem is that ‘loving, supportive and respectful’ is temporary. What if the relationship stops being loving? What if it’s loving for one person and not the other? How do you know if it is still loving or not? Is it how you feel? What does ‘supportive’ mean? Does it mean I bring home the bacon or I sit and drink tea with my spouse and listen to her while she complains about her corns? What does ‘respectful’ mean? That I like the other person or that she likes me? That she has read my PhD thesis and thinks me clever or that I think she is pretty smart because she can bake cookies and they don’t stick to the tray? And what if one of these three things stop? Do they all have to stop for the relationship to no longer be a relationship?

Marriage, on the other hands, is objective. It is at least a civil agreement and at best a sacrament which unlocks divine love within human love. Marriage is something tangible and real and eternal. Compare the sentimental and subjective ‘loving, supportive and respectful’ to the grim glory of the marriage vows: “I vow to love and to cherish until death do us part, for richer for poorer for better or for worse, in sickness and in health…” Of course a marriage should be ‘loving, supportive and respectful’ (whatever that means) but that on it’s own such a definition has no more substance than a Hallmark card.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



March 30, 2009

Tales of Horror

Next Post



April 1, 2009 The Logic of Hell


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Matters Apologetics Architecture Blobble Study Book Reviews Brideshead Caitlin O'Rourke Catholic Art Catholic Culture Church Politics Chust for Nice Contemporary Culture Duane Mandible Ed Blanch Film Reviews Fr Harvey Nicolaitan Frank Viola Mantilla the Hon More Christianity Mrs Brady Catholic Old Lady Mystery of the Magi Norman Anderson Queen Hillary Saints and Supernatural Spirituality The Inklings The Vicar Theology Todd Unctuous Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Elijah's successor, receiving a double portion of his spirit?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samuel Elisha Obadiah Micaiah

Related posts from Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Catholic

Episcopal Woman Priest Says Abortionists are "Saints"

Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Catholic

Pondering Slavery and Homosexual Actions

Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Catholic

Pachamama and the Pieta

Fr. Dwight Longenecker

Catholic

Pagans, Pantheism and Polytheism

Fr. Dwight Longenecker

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Christ’s Two Natures And The Mystery Of Human...

The teaching of the incarnation is at the heart of the Christian...

Halloween, Tolkien, And The Victory of Grace

If I had to choose a favorite month of the year, it...

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube