Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

spiritualnaturalist

Patterns

Last updated on: April 10, 2024 at 10:29 am   by Spiritual Naturalist Society

Patterns 2024-04-07T10:30:42-04:00 Spiritual Naturalist Society

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by Thomas Schenk

Credit: Jonathan
From Flickr

The mind likes patterns. It finds them everywhere. Sometimes these patterns actually exist, and sometimes the mind imposes them where they don’t actually exist, and sometimes the mind simply invents them for the joy of it. The fist of these is a basis for science, the third a basis for art, and the second is a basis for the broad realm of illusions.

It is far easier to remember something that is organized into a pattern than to remember something that is random. Mnemonics takes advantage of this.

Often we need to find a pattern to something in order for it to make sense. The mind also likes things to make sense. This preference for things making sense is probably why the mind sometimes imposes a pattern where one doesn’t really exist.

The minds of earlier peoples also liked things to make sense. Since they didn’t have anything like modern science to guide them, they told stories that purported to make sense of a whole range of phenomena. These stories, these mythological cosmologies, made the world seem more sensible, less alien.

As constellations impose a pattern on random collections of stars, so cosmologies impose a pattern on the world. To impose that pattern, they usually shrink the world to a relatively small size in space and time. And a common feature of such cosmologies is that they give the peoples who create them a central position in the pattern of events that comprise that world.

In his great work The Divine Comedy, Dante articulates a medieval Christian cosmology. It is a detailed description of a world only a few thousand years old and where the farthest reaches of space are closer than we now know the moon to be. It is a world in which the activities of humans, or at least European humans, are of deep concern to a human-like God.

The cosmology of modern science, the origin of which date about 300 years after Dante, rapidly smashed the small, fragile cosmology of medieval Christianity. Rather than shrinking the world, scientific cosmology has consistently expanded its temporal and spatial horizons. Although science reveals underlying patterns to how the Universe has evolved over time, it has refused to give humans any privileged place in that Universe.

The physicist Steven Weinberg wrote: “The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.” I can relate to the sentiment, but I don’t find it true. As I have stated in previous posts, when we truly see ourselves as an integral part of the Universe, then the meaning and value we experience in our own lives are part of the Universe. It has brought us forth and sustains us, we creatures that can find value and find meaning in life. Whatever else the Universe is, it is also the original source of that possibility of value and meaning we humans find so important.

In his book, Mind and Nature – A Necessary Unity, Gregory Bateson writes of the “pattern that connects.” This is a mega pattern that connects all life together and life to the physical world. It is the pattern that reveals that we are an integral part of the universe; a pattern that shows that there is no basis for the duality of mind and matter that had been central to Christian mythology.

As stated earlier, we humans sometimes impose patterns where they don’t actually exist. Perhaps that is the case with this ”pattern that connects.” But I think there are good reasons to believe that something like this actually exists. I prefer to call it Tao, but no mere word is adequate to represent it.

The Universe is highly dynamic. Within it all things change ceaselessly. But due to this underlying thing Bateson called “the pattern that connects,” the change is not random, but processional and creational. In this it is something as worthy of reverence as the deities of any earlier cosmology.

__________
Learn about Membership in the Spiritual Naturalist Society

The Spiritual Naturalist Society works to spread awareness of spiritual naturalism as a way of life, develop its thought and practice, and help bring together like-minded practitioners in fellowship.

SNS strives to include diverse voices within the spectrum of naturalistic spirituality. Authors will vary in their opinions, terms, and outlook. The views of no single author therefore necessarily reflect those of all Spiritual Naturalists or of SNS.

Uncategorized

Nature

patterns

Previous Post



April 7, 2024

Keep Your Mind In The Boat

Next Post



April 21, 2024 Paradox and a Practice


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Spiritual Naturalism Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 August 2017 July 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 January 2015 December 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Abraham's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leah Sarah Rachel Rebekah

Related posts from The Spiritual Naturalist

New Visions

The Naturalistic Equivalent of God

The Spiritual Naturalist

New Visions

Creational Nature

The Spiritual Naturalist

New Visions

Book Review: For Small Creatures Such as We

The Spiritual Naturalist

New Visions

Nature’s Awareness

The Spiritual Naturalist

TRENDING AT PATHEOS New Visions

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all New Visions blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube