Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
New Visions
What Do All Spiritual Naturalists Have in Common?

What Do All Spiritual Naturalists Have in Common?

Last updated on: March 10, 2023 at 6:15 pm by Spiritual Naturalist Society

What Do All Spiritual Naturalists Have in Common? 2023-03-06T18:17:02-05:00 Spiritual Naturalist Society

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by B. T. Newberg

(When there are five Thursdays in a month, such as this month, we feature a “classic” article from SNS’ early years on the fifth Thursday. Today’s article, by B. T. Newberg, first appeared on August 13, 2012.)

The Spiritual Naturalist Society brings together naturalistic strands from a wide variety of traditions, from Buddhism to Christianity to Atheism. Is there really anything shared in common by these strands?

I think there is. What’s more, I suspect it’s not just loose resemblance, but something absolutely fundamental. What is it? It’s simply the fact that we explain everything in terms of Nature. Mainstream forms of religions may understand the world in terms of God’s will, Tao, dharma, etc. But naturalistic forms all understand it in terms of nature. For most of us today, that usually means a modern scientific view of nature.

In order to unpack that idea, let’s take a quick crash course in root metaphors.

What is a root metaphor?
All explanations rely on metaphors, explaining one thing in terms of another. A root metaphor is one by which virtually everything else is explained.

According to Loyal Rue, the root metaphor fuses ideas about what’s real and what matters: “The root metaphor renders the real sacred, and the sacred real.” (Rue, 2005)

For example, the mainstream Judeo-Christo-Islamic traditions, which use the root metaphor of God-as-person, ground all ideas about how the world came to be and how we should behave in the creative will of God.

Other traditions use other root metaphors. According to Rue, ancient Greek philosophy uses logos, Hinduism and Buddhism dharma, Chinese religion Tao, and so on.

What I’m proposing is that naturalistic forms of traditions reject these other root metaphors in favor of Nature. This root metaphor may have replaced the others, or always existed side-by-side with them.

Naturalistic forms of religions share the root metaphor of Nature.

Nature the explainer
Evidence for this claim is demonstrable by differences in how we explain things.

The role God plays in the Abrahamic mainstream is explanandus, or explainer (Rue, 1989): Why is the sky blue? Because God made it that way. Why should we love each other? Because God wants us to.

The metaphor of God-as-person succinctly explains how things are (God willed them so) and how we ought to live (according to God’s will).

For naturalists, such a metaphor is no longer credible. Instead, we have come to a point where God is the explanandum, or what needs to be explained: Why does God never mention kangaroos in the Bible? Because the authors of the Bible, all too human, didn’t know about Australia.

Here, a natural explanation illuminates the nature of “God.” Nature has become the explainer.

In Eastern traditions, the conversation gets more challenging, but still works. Here’s a dharmic version from Buddhism: How do we know karma conditions rebirth after death? Because that is the nature of the dharma, which the Buddha perceived.

And a naturalistic version: How do we know karma conditions rebirth after death? Because we experience one moment of consciousness “dying” and conditioning the “birth” of another (birth and death have been redefined in naturalistic terms).

Nature is the explainer, and that’s what we all have in common.

Would you agree? Or is there something else more fundamental that we share?

Subscribe to The Spiritual Naturalist Society
Learn about Membership in the Spiritual Naturalist Society

__________
The Spiritual Naturalist Society works to spread awareness of spiritual naturalism as a way of life, develop its thought and practice, and help bring together like-minded practitioners in fellowship.
__________

B.T. Newberg continues this series: How do you understand nature?

References

Rue, L. (1989). Amythia. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Rue, L. (2005). Religion Is Not About God. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Previous Post

March 6, 2023

Exploration: The Ambition for Discovery

Next Post

March 10, 2023 Gratitude Journaling

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Spiritual Naturalism Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 August 2017 July 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 January 2015 December 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz