BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
The Soul and the City
- Home
- Latter-day Saint
- The Soul and the City — The Necessary Political Moment in Religious Reflection
The Soul and the City — The Necessary Political Moment in Religious Reflection
Last updated on: September 2, 2014 at 7:50 pm by rhancock
The Soul and the City — The Necessary Political Moment in Religious Reflection 2014-09-02T19:50:24-06:00 rhancock
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
This is my attempt to introduce something of the point of view that will inform this new blog. (I thank our hosts at Patheos for the opportunity, as well as my LDS friends and fellow bloggers who have preceded me here.) No doubt I will attempt other “introductions” — especially since, upon review, this little ditty is not quite as “introductory” as I might wish. So let me try to make amends in advance to any reader who might find this post hard to follow by stating as plainly as possible the point I try to develop below:
Religious (and philosophical) beliefs are naturally bound up with political assumptions and opinions — understandings of human excellence and of the good community. As Plato saw 2300+ years ago, the soul is always defined in relation to the city — and vise versa.
So now to the slightly longer form of the argument. And examples and illustrations will follow, of course, in future posts.
If man were completely ignorant of himself, he would not be poetic; for one cannot depict what one has no idea of. If he saw himself clearly, his imagination would remain idle and would have nothing to add to the picture. But man is uncovered enough to perceive something of himself and veiled enough so that the rest is sunk in impenetrable darkness, into which he plunges constantly and always in vain, in order to succeed in grasping himself.
–Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America
It is hard to disagree with Pascal’s famous observation that we know too little to be dogmatists and too much to be skeptics, but it is even harder to know what to do with this insight, or to know where it leaves us. But we can say that where it leaves us is at the threshold of three human possibilities: we are poetic, we are philosophical, and we are political beings.
We are poetic beings because we are productive of meaning: our very existence secretes meaning; we cannot exist without acting, we cannot act without imagining, that is, without conceiving purposes. And we cannot conceive purposes without conceiving (however dimly and implicitly) some understanding of the Whole, of the way things our and of our place in the whole among the things that are.
Philosophy is the natural (albeit rare) extension of this natural interest in conceiving the whole, which cannot be severed from our interest in understanding our place in the whole (and the whole’s place in us), from man’s interest, as Tocqueville says, “in grasping himself.”
We are political beings because this natural interest in understanding the whole and our place in it can never be consummated. This failure fully to grasp ourselves or the elusive whole in which we find ourselves leaves us dependent upon the conventional wholes – the practical orders — which precede us and in which we live, breathe and have our being. Just as every idea of God as “Father” cannot avoid deriving meaning from our concrete, mortal experience of fatherhood (and the same can be said, mutatis mutandi, for motherhood), so every idea of Zion or of Celestial Glory must draw upon notions of justice and the common good that arise from our political speech and action, from the fundamentally political condition of our humanity.
We are beings open to—or vulnerable to– the claims of revealed religion because neither poetry, nor philosophy, nor politics can fully respond to our interest in meaningful action, and thus in understanding the whole and our place in it, in grasping what is and in grasping ourselves.
I do not say that this interest in “grasping,” in comprehending the whole and our place in it can ever be absolutely fulfilled, or even that we can coherently wish for such a fulfillment. The openness of the whole to the creative action of unique personal agents, to development or even, yes “progress,” is a true insight by which Christianity definitively surpassed the greatest wisdom of the pagans. Of course this Christian insight was largely suppressed or covered over in traditional rational theology, which had to borrow fundamental categories from Greek philosophy. And this is precisely where the distinctive resources of Latter-day Saint doctrine come into view: No body of belief that I know of equals LDS belief in its capacity to sustain an equilibrium between the cosmos as a stable form of meaning and the openness of being to the creative choices of persons.
But both this stable form (“Eternal Law”) and this openness (“Eternal Progress”) must be understood through an ongoing engagement with both the moral presuppositions and the progressive hopes of our political world. Whether by refining our politically-conditioned common sense, or by extracting our eternal laws and hopes from defective political models, reflection on our political condition and our political situation is inherent in theological reflection.
Thus the insight, so famously inaugurated in Plato’s Republic, that our understanding of the soul is deeply implicated in our understanding of the city, and vise versa, seems to me eternally relevant. We ignore the necessary political bearing of our religious beliefs at our peril — our spiritual as well as political peril.
This probably all seems quite abstract and removed from concrete religious and political concerns. But as I say, examples, illustrations and developments will follow.
Previous Post

May 9, 2018
200 Years of Karl Marx
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Uncategorized
Select a Month May 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 May 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Who was Jesus’ mother?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Sarah Esther Ruth Mary
Related posts from The Soul and the City
Vulgar Elitism & Empty Populism
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint
Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...
At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...
8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul
Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...
Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us
“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...
What this is NOT about. This blog is definitely not about...
Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...
The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...
A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...
view all Latter-day Saint blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In



–Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America








