Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Politics and Religion
The Problematic Disabilities Language in the Gospels

The Problematic Disabilities Language in the Gospels

Last updated on: May 22, 2025 at 11:13 am by Herb Montgomery

The Problematic Disabilities Language in the Gospels 2025-05-22T11:13:15-04:00 Herb Montgomery

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Wrestling with the Gospels' Problematic Disability Language

Image by Canva

Again, let me give you just one example of the four gospels’s problematic language when it comes to disabilities. When Matthew’s gospel refers to religious leaders that were complicit in political and economic harm against the vulnerable people in Jesus’ society, it portrays Jesus telling the people, “Leave them; they are blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit” (Matthew 15:14).

Welcome Readers! Please subscribe to Social Jesus Here.

This is Part 2 of The Jesus Story and Living with Disabilities

(Read this series from its beginning here.)

In passages like this, the gospels use blindness, deafness, the inability to speak, and the inability to walk as metaphors for something sinful or erroneous while characterizing mobility, vision, and hearing ability as righteous, whole, just, or holy. This language characterizes folks who live their daily lives with any of these disabilities as somehow of less worth or value. And it is akin to how Blackness is often equated with evil or sin (i.e. “the black sheep of the family) while whiteness and light is equated with righteousness or holiness. These racial implications have been promoted by those who subscribe to White supremacy for centuries. But it’s not especially righteous to have no disabilities. Being disabled is not a metaphor for being evil, sinful, or broken.

In this week’s passage, John’s gospel uses the man who couldn’t walk to set up a conflict between Jesus and the powerful in his society over Jesus healing the man on the Sabbath and Jesus’ relation to the Divine. I wish the gospel writers had given this man a name in a way that would have affirmed his humanity and worth, but he is instead presented as a nameless narrative object that only serves as a plot point in the larger story. This pattern also repeats in the gospels. The synoptic example is in Mark 2:1-12, and both Mark and John include a variation of Jesus’ instruction: “I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home” (Mark 2:11, cf. John 5:8). In Mark, the story of Jesus healing a man who could not walk is at the center of a discussion on forgiveness. Here in John, it is used to discuss Sabbath observance and Jesus’ divinity: “For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God” (John 5:18).

Over and over, disabilities are a theme in the gospels. The gospel authors characterize Jesus as reversing disabilities and using disabilities as a metaphor for things we need liberation from. And the gospel authors use Jesus’ interaction with people with disabilities to provide a context for other theological debate of that time.

Although I wish the gospel authors had handled disabilities with greater care, the evidence Jesus repeatedly gives for the authenticity of his teachings is his interactions with people living in poverty and people living with disabilities.

For example, when John the Baptist’s disciples question whether Jesus was really the one they had been looking for, Jesus replies, “The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor” (Matthew 11:5, cf. Luke 7:22). In Luke’s gospel, Jesus’ gospel is defined in itself as good news the poor, liberation for the oppressed, and the restoration of sight for the blind (see Luke 4:18). This challenges me another level.

I grew up in Christianity, and heard the gospel more times than I can count. But it wasn’t until much later, as an adult, that I ever heard the gospel as good news for the poor or good news to people living with disabilities. The good news was presented to me as universal, for all, poor and rich alike, because it had precious little to do with the material, economic, or political world around us. The gospel I grew up hearing about had zero specific application to the poor or those with disabilities, because it was solely about giving everyone forgiveness of sins and the assurance of heaven. That forgiveness and assurance never needs to mention poverty or disabilities, and in fact, the gospel I grew up with never did.

Where does this leave us today who want to return to a more consistent definition of what it means to follow the Jesus in the story? That’s what we’ll consider in Part 3.

Are you receiving all of RHM’s free resources each week?

Begin each day being inspired toward love, compassion, justice and action. Free.

General Christian

Politics and Religion

About Herb Montgomery

Herb Montgomery, director of Renewed Heart Ministries, is an author and adult religious re-educator helping Christians explore the intersection of their faith with love, compassion, action, and societal justice. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

May 16, 2025

How Love and Social Justice are Connected

Next Post

May 22, 2025 Disabilities and Narratives of Inclusion and Accessiblity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ableism Abolition Advent Anti Semitism Christianity Christmas Climate Justice Criminal Justice Democracy Disability Justice Distributive Justice Easter Economic Justice Environmental Justice Equity Feminism Government Immigration Justice Indigenous Justice Interfaith Law and Order LGBTQ Affirmation Liberation Theology Migrant Justice Myth of Redemptive Suffering Nonviolence Prayer Racial Justice Reparation Resistance Resurrection Social Gospel Social Justice Survival Uncategorized Womanism

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which short letter urges forgiveness for a runaway slave named Onesimus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Titus Jude Philemon 2 Timothy