Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Politics and Religion
The Heated Rivalry of David and Jonathan

The Heated Rivalry of David and Jonathan

Last updated on: August 20, 2026 at 1:16 pm by Stuart Delony

0 Comments

The Heated Rivalry of David and Jonathan 2026-08-20T13:16:35-04:00 Stuart Delony

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Illustration of David and Jonathan in biblical robes facing each other with a crown between them under the title “Heated Rivalry: The Bible’s Most Ambiguous Duo.”

Image created by DALL-E

Christians insist the Bible is crystal clear about everything.

Especially sex.

Gender. Marriage. Morality. Apparently the Almighty took special care to spell out every cultural panic point Americans might someday invent.

But every now and then you run into a passage that makes those same readers suddenly… cautious.

Careful.

Interpretively flexible.

Which brings us to one of the strangest “rivalries” in the entire Bible.

And why it reads suspiciously like the ancient version of The Ambiguously Gay Duo—just with fewer capes and more monarchy.

The Rivalry That Should Have Happened

On paper, the story is simple.

Jonathan is the crown prince—the son of King Saul and heir to Israel’s throne.

David is the young war hero who just killed Goliath and is quickly becoming more popular than the king himself.

If you’ve read literally any ancient history, you know how this usually ends:

The heir eliminates the threat.
The threat eliminates the heir.
Civil war.
Someone gets stabbed.

Instead, the story takes a very different turn.

According to First Book of Samuel 18:

“The soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David.”

That’s… not how rivalries usually start.

The text continues:

Jonathan loved David as his own soul.

Which is already a little intense.

Then the crown prince removes his royal robe, armor, sword, bow, and belt and gives them to David.

In the ancient world those weren’t random accessories.

They symbolized authority.

Power.

Kingship.

In other words, the heir to the throne meets the rising challenger and immediately hands him the symbols of rule.

But here’s the part that makes historians raise an eyebrow.

In ancient monarchies, new kings almost always killed the previous king’s sons to eliminate rival claims to the throne. It was brutal, but it was standard political survival.

Jonathan doesn’t try to eliminate David.

He effectively hands him the throne.

If this is a heated rivalry, Jonathan is playing the game very badly.

A Rival Who Keeps Saving His Enemy

From there the story gets even stranger.

Saul becomes jealous of David and starts trying to kill him.

Jonathan’s response?

He protects David.
He warns him about Saul’s plans.
He defends him in front of the king.
He risks his own position to keep David alive.

Then the two men repeatedly form covenants with each other—solemn promises of loyalty and protection.

Again: terrible strategy for someone supposedly competing for the throne.

Most royal rivalries end with betrayal.

This one keeps ending with loyalty.

At some point you have to admit the rivalry is behaving a little… suspiciously.

The Line That Breaks Everyone’s Brain

Eventually Jonathan dies in battle alongside his father.

David mourns him publicly with a lament recorded in Second Book of Samuel.

And this is where the interpretive sweat begins.

David declares:

“Your love to me was wonderful, surpassing the love of women.”

Now imagine a man in the Bible saying that about a woman.

No one would hesitate.

That’s devotion.
That’s romance.
That’s poetry.

But when David says it about Jonathan, something fascinating happens.

Suddenly everyone becomes extremely careful.

“Ancient friendship language.”

“Brotherly love.”

“Stop sexualizing the Bible.”

Now, to be fair, ancient cultures did describe male friendship in emotional ways modern readers aren’t always used to.

But here’s the odd part.

The Bible is not shy about sex.

Adultery.
Prostitutes.
Concubines.
Entire genealogies built on who slept with whom.

Scripture will casually tell you someone slept with their father’s concubine.

But apparently the real interpretive danger is two men caring about each other too much.

The Masculinity Problem

What actually seems to make modern readers nervous isn’t the text.

It’s the affection.

The Bible portrays men expressing loyalty, grief, and love without embarrassment.

They embrace.
They weep.
They mourn publicly.

David openly proclaims that Jonathan’s love meant more to him than the love of women.

Meanwhile modern evangelical masculinity struggles to survive a side hug.

So when readers encounter David and Jonathan, the instinct isn’t curiosity.

It’s containment.

Explain it.
Neutralize it.
Make sure everyone understands this is a very normal, extremely non-threatening friendship.

And American Christianity does not enjoy wobbling.

The Bible’s Most Ambiguous Duo

Here’s the funny part.

David and Jonathan are introduced in a situation that should produce one of the greatest rivalries in scripture.

The crown prince versus the rising king.

Instead we get loyalty.
Covenants.
Devotion.
And a love David later says surpassed the love of women.

What exactly that relationship meant has been debated for centuries.

But the real curiosity isn’t solving the mystery.

The real curiosity is how quickly some people need the mystery to disappear.

Because the Bible is supposedly clear about everything.

Except when two men care about each other too much.

The Word of God can survive genocide, war, and apocalyptic beasts—but it might collapse entirely if David loved Jonathan a little too much.

General Christian

Relationships and Religion

biblical relationships

David and Jonathan

evangelical culture

masculinity and Christianity

Old Testament

About Stuart Delony

I’m Stuart Delony, a former pastor who walked out of the church but couldn’t shake the ways of Jesus. These days, I host Snarky Faith—a podcast and platform that wrestles with faith, culture, and meaning from the fringe. I’m not here to fix Christianity. I’m here to name what’s broken, find what’s still worth keeping, and hold space for the questions that don’t have clean answers. If you’ve been burned, disillusioned, or just done with the noise—welcome. You’re in good company. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

March 3, 2026

Megatron Is a Gun (And That’s the First Clue)

Next Post

March 17, 2026 Poe’s Law, but Make It Biblical

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I've seen Noah believers use the claim "every culture tells stories of a flood, so ..."

EarthGrowl

Noah Was Never About the Animals

"So we shouldn't obey God?"

Harold Porter

Noah Was Never About the Animals

"Great article, Stuart. Important insights.For many years, as a theologically "educated" Evangelical (all well pre-MAGA, ..."

Howard Pepper

Noah Was Never About the Animals

"https://media1.giphy.com/me..."

Stuart Delony

Noah Was Never About the Animals

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abuse & Power abuse coverups Abuse in the Church Advent AI AI and Technology American Christianity American democracy American Evangelicalism American Governance Antisemitism Apocalypse Culture Apocalyptic Theology Authentic Love Author Insights Authoritarianism Bible Bible & Scripture Bible Criticism Biblical Authority Biblical Interpretation Biblical Satire Book of Revelation book reviews Books and Reviews Capitalism Catholicism Charismatic Christianity Christian Activism Christian apocalypse culture Christian Commentary Christian Conservatism Christian Critique Christian Culture Christian History Christian Literature Christian Living Christian Music Christian Mysticism Christian Myths Christian Nationalism Christian Satire Christian Traditions Christian Zionism Christianity Christmas Church & Culture Church Abuse Church Accountability Church and State church corruption Church Critique Church Culture Church History Church Leadership Church Power and Abuse Churches of God Civil Rights Comic Book Analysis Commentary community Complementarianism Conservative Politics Conspiracy Theories Consumerism conversations cosmic philosophy Creation and Spirituality Creationism Critical Essays critical thinking Critique Cults Cultural Commentary cultural identity culture Culture and Society Culture Critique culture war Christianity Culture Wars Current Event Data & Religion Deconstruction Dominionism Dunning-Krueger Effect Easter Economics Editorial Education and Religion Election Emotional Health in Religion Emotional Wellness Empire End Times End Times Theology Environment Environmental Collapse equality Eschatology ethics Evangelical Culture Evangelical Hypocrisy Evangelicalism Evangelicalism Critique Evangelism existential journey Exorcisms Faith Faith & Culture Faith & Deconstruction Faith & Doubt Faith & Identity Faith & Politics Faith and Culture faith and doubt Faith and Mental Health Faith and Power Faith and Spirituality Faith critique Faith Deconstruction Faith Exploration Faith Formation faith journey Faith vs. Science Faith-based Scams False Prophets family Family and Relationships Family Gatherings Feminism Feminism and Conservatism football Gaza gender Gender and Power Gender Equality Gender Roles Geopolitics gospel music Grace Grief and Loss Growth and Change Gun Violence Hamas Healing and Recovery Healthcare Justice historical analysis History History and Religion Holiday Survival Holidays hope Humor Identity Idolatry in Modern Christianity Independence Day Intellectual Reads Interfaith Dialogue interview Israel Jesus' Teachings Kamala Kamala Harris Lament Late-Stage Capitalism leadership LGBTQ+ Literary Analysis Love MAGA Masculinity Meaning & Ethics Media Analysis Media and Religion Memorial Day mental health Militarism mimetic theory Misinterpretations Misogyny Modern Christianity modern culture modern faith Monasticism Music Music and Culture Mysticism Nationalism Nature and the Divine NCAA NDA opinion Orthodoxy vs Orthopraxy Pacifism Patriarchy Peace Personal Development Personal Growth Personal Reflection philosophy Philosophy of Faith podcast Political Commentary Political Humor Political Theology politics Politics & Culture politics & current events Politics and Religion pop culture Post-Evangelical power and control Power and Religion Power Dynamics Privilege Progressive Christian Progressive Christianity Prophetic Satire Prophetic Witness Prosperity Gospel psychology Psychology and Society Purity Culture Quantum Physics radical love rapture theology Recognizing Cultish Behavior Reflection and Critique Refugee & Immigration Policy Relationships Religion Religion & Culture Religion & Politics Religion & Spirituality Religion and Ethics Religion and Politics Religion and Public Safety Religion and Science Religion and Society Religion History Religion News Religious Accountability Religious Criticism Religious Critique Religious Diversity Religious Hypocrisy Religious Propaganda religious satire Reproductive Rights Resilience Resurrection Revelation sarcasm satire Satirical Guides Scandal Science & Spirituality Science and Religion science fiction review scriptural interpretation scripture Scripture & Misreadings Seasonal Holidays Second Amendment Sermon on the Mount Sex Sexuality and Culture Skepticism Snarky Faith Social Analysis Social Commentary Social Issues Social Justice Social Media Critique Social Trends society Society & Culture Soul Southern Baptist Convention Spiritual Abuse spiritual exploration Spiritual Growth Spiritual Practices Spiritual Psychology spiritual truths Spirituality sports Storytelling and Theology suffering Superstition & Faith Technology & Religion Televangelists Television Thanksgiving theocracy Theology Theology Gone Wrong Toxic Theology Trump Trump and Religion U.S. Politics UFO Uncategorized War War and Religion weaponized scripture Weaponized Theology White Supremacy Women’s Autonomy Worship Worship Culture

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Mary's cousin?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leah Elizabeth Rachel Sarah