Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
LBCF: Fact and Fiction

LBCF: Fact and Fiction

Last updated on: July 31, 2026 at 4:52 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

LBCF: Fact and Fiction 2026-07-31T16:52:22-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(A Left Behind series re-run originally posted in 2007.)

Left Behind, pp. 308-314

It is, at last, Tuesday. The previous Tuesday was the morning after The Event and Rayford Steele has had a very busy week since then, getting saved, pestering his daughter, creeping out Hattie, shopping for electronics, reading up on Romanian politics, flying to and from Atlanta and calling poor Bruce Barnes at all hours of the night.

And now it’s Tuesday again. Rayford could never get the hang of Tuesdays.

Bruce Barnes called the core group together for an emergency meeting at New Hope Village Church [on] Tuesday afternoon. Rayford drove over, hoping it would be worth his time …

Bruce gathered everyone around his desk in the office … and then had everyone turn to the book of Revelation.

Well it’s about time, isn’t it? Bruce spent years at this church, listening to Pastor Billings preach sermon after sermon from the book of Revelation. Time and again he would have heard his boss say that this is the most important section of the Bible, the culmination of all that precedes it. He would have heard Billings stress that the meaning of every other section of the Scriptures — the histories, the prophets, the psalms and philosophers, the epistles and even the Gospels themselves — could only be understood properly through the prism of this strange final book which, he claimed, foretold a precise sequence of events. Now Billings is gone and the events he predicted have begun occurring in precisely the fashion that he predicted them — so why did it take Barnes a whole week to finally have everyone turn to the book of Revelation?

It makes sense for Bruce and his new congregation to dive into this study of prophecy with an obsessive urgency. They find themselves suddenly living in an apocalyptic world, so studying the Apocalypse seems like a logical step.

What I don’t understand, though, is why the Rev. Billings, who knew he would never live in such a world himself, spent so much of his time studying all of this. Billings’ belief that Revelation is the most important passage in the Bible turns out to have been true only for the few members of his congregation who were otherwise unaffected by his preaching — for Bruce and Loretta and the handful of other non-RTCs who were left behind. But for himself and the majority of his flock — for Irene and all the others who were taken — all those years spent preaching about Tribulation timelines, beasts, judgments and all the rest were just a waste of time.

Drilling your followers with the details of events that, by definition, neither you nor they will ever see seems like an odd understanding of Christian ministry. Even if Billings were right, such preaching would be bound to be fruitless.

In the religion of LaHaye and Jenkins, of course, “rightness” is all that matters, i.e., that the propositions to which one attests are correct. The Rev. Billings is the embodiment of their idea of rightness, which is why the authors seem to take Billings’ fictional vindication — in a story they imagined and wrote themselves — as proof of their own actual vindication. But that earlier word, “fruitless,” also carries a theological meaning. If L&J had not, like Billings, wasted so much of their lives with an exclusive focus on supposed “prophecy,” they might have realized that the rest of the Bible teaches that to be “right” without bearing fruit is just another way of being wrong.

By that standard, the prophecy-mania religion of L&J is wrong. It is not wrong simply because it is based on the incoherent fever-dream of a long-dead Adventist, or because it replaces the Bible with its own unrecognizable reinterpretation of it. I’m sure those don’t help, but they’re not the main reasons the religion of L&J is wrong. It is wrong because it is fruitless — it does not, and cannot, bear fruit.

Anyway, back to Bruce Barnes:

“As you know, I’ve been studying Revelation and several commentaries about end-times events. Well, today in the pastor’s files I ran across one of his sermons on the subject. I’ve been reading the Bible and the books on the subject, and here’s what I’ve found.”

Bruce pulled up the first blank sheet on a flip chart and showed a time line he had drawn. …

That timeline would have looked something like this:

That chart is from End-Times preacher Clarence Larkin, who taught that the prophecies it illustrated proved the Rapture was imminent and would occur at any moment, during his lifetime. He preached this for decades up until his death in 1924.

Most “Bible-prophecy scholars” produce charts like this — attempts to represent the events described in Revelation as a straightforward, linear narrative progressing from Point A to Point B over the course of seven years.

Why seven years? Because, as everyone knows, that’s how long this Great Tribulation will last. If you’re wondering where in Revelation it says this, the answer is it doesn’t. The seven-year span comes from the ninth chapter of Daniel — which is also where the idea of Nicolae’s peace treaty with Israel comes from — in which we read of “70 sevens.” (Silly Daniel thought he was addressing readers of his own time, but Tim LaHaye knows that he was really speaking to the enlightened American PMDs of the mid 20th late 20th early 21st century.)

The enthusiasm for these timelines arises partly from the challenge such a task presents. John’s kaleidoscopic visions don’t easily allow for such a straightforward, linear progression. This accounts for the wide variety of such timelines, most of which include something like Ptolemaic epicycles in their attempts to force John’s narrative into line.

One delightfully strange thing about PMDs is the way they earnestly insist that all they’re doing is providing a straightforward, linear reading of a straightforward, linear account. All the while they insist this they’re jumping to and fro — from Revelation to Daniel, to Thessalonians, back to an (earlier) chapter of Revelation, then to Ezekiel. Even as they tie themselves into knots flipping around, back and forth, to and fro, unable to work their way through John’s apocalypse from beginning to end without recursive loops back to earlier chapters, even as they themselves get lost in the convoluted mess of it all and they are forced back to the drawing board to try again to force this narrative into a tidy timeline — through all of that they seem utterly sincere in insisting that this impossible-to-follow-the-same-way-twice approach is really nothing more than a straightforward, linear and “literal” reading. It would be laughable if it weren’t so heartfelt.

No, scratch that. It’s still laughable.

Bruce Barnes displays this same naive approach here. He starts by having everyone open their Bibles to the book of Revelation but then he never once reads from it. For the next six pages of blatant exposition, Barnes instead works his way through his end-times timeline, implying that this is nothing more than what they all could simply read for themselves in the book of Revelation.

He never has them read it for themselves because simply reading that book wouldn’t obviously result in anything like his timeline.

For the purposes of this story, of course, it doesn’t much matter what the actual book of Revelation says or means. On one level, quibbling about whether or not Bruce’s interpretation is legitimate makes no more sense than pointing out that “Gerald Fitzhugh” isn’t really the president of the United States, or that, in the real world, Ban Ki-moon’s service as secretary-general of the United Nations does not actually make him the supreme overlord of every nation.

Left Behind is a fictional world, and as such its creators are free to invent a fictional president, a fictional Manhattan that’s 50 miles long and a fictional U.N. with fictional powers. They are even free to invent a fictional Bible full of fictional prophecies. This is exactly what L&J have done.

Their problem — and it’s a big problem — is that neither they nor most of their millions of devoted readers realize that this is what they have done. They recognize that “Fitz” is a piece of fantasy and imagination, but they think the equally unreal Bible in their story is the same one we have here in reality. They present an inhuman planet inhabited by alien creatures who hardly seem to care that all of their children have vanished and yet they imagine that this imaginary world is a realistic portrayal of realistic people.

The main differences between the world of Left Behind and the real world are not the products of the authors’ invention, but the products of the authors’ mistakes.

In any case, Bruce is in too much of a hurry to bog down his emergency meeting with Bible-reading. He’s got to get through a thumbnail sketch of the entire Left Behind series in only six pages.

This is a rather unconventional form of exposition. Usually, exposition serves the purpose of bringing readers up to speed on what has already happened in a story. Not here. Bruce’s six-page expository suppository tells readers what is going to happen later in this series. This isn’t foreshadowing, it’s foreclipsing. His timeline may not have much to do with the actual book of Revelation, but it’s eerily prescient in foretelling what comes next in the outline L&J used for writing this book. I can imagine that form of prophetic knowledge providing the basis for an intriguing, Pirandello-ish bit of metafiction, but here it serves mainly as an embedded spoiler, eliminating whatever potential for suspense the series might otherwise have had. Foreshadowing can enhance suspense, fore-telling — which is what L&J believe they are doing here — just ruins the surprise.

Why would the authors do this? Why spoil their own story arc by summarizing it here in the middle of Book 1? I think this arises again from their confusion of fictional vindication and actual vindication. By writing a novel in which prophecies are foretold and then fulfilled, they believe they have not just illustrated but proven that the prophecies they claim to believe will also be fulfilled.

The difference between fact and fiction ought to be easier to discern if you’re the one writing the fiction, but for L&J that doesn’t seem to be the case.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 30, 2026

History in the hands of an angry God

Next Post

August 2, 2026 'Airplane evangelists' vs. 'Sweet Caroline'

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Since mom died, I've made a point to try to call my dad more often ..."

Ross

The purpose-driven labor priest

"If it was worked to correctly consider any money they bring in, from any source, ..."

Cobalt Blue

The purpose-driven labor priest

"March 2025.Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/18/musk-starlink-internet-white-house"

Matri

The purpose-driven labor priest

"I'm kinda looking forward to the moment when Elon decides that Trump's downfall would be ..."

Ross

The purpose-driven labor priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the King who made Esther his queen?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hezekiah Barnabas Ahasuerus Jeremiah