Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
The ‘Christian nationalism’ of religious minorities

The ‘Christian nationalism’ of religious minorities

Last updated on: June 11, 2026 at 5:08 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

The ‘Christian nationalism’ of religious minorities 2026-06-11T17:08:09-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The revision of the revision of the Department of Defense’s “religion codes” was something of a win for the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-day Saints.

Prominent LDS figures had objected to the first revision to the list not designating their church as a sub-category of “Christian” — along with the Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, and the unworkably small set of other Christian denominations included in the new, “streamlined” list. The Pentagon responded by removing that sub-category.

Utah Sen. Mike Lee, who spent the weekend complaining about what he perceived as a snub in the initial revision, was pleased and grateful for the latest change, even though the government list still does not characterize his LDS church as “Christian.” What matters to Lee, it seems, is that his own MAGA Republican regime is not explicitly excluding the LDS Church as part of its “anti-DEI” crusade (yet). Latter-day Saints are still, for now, included in the limited diversity tolerated by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s white/Christian nationalist agenda.

This whole business can help us to explore the difference between two very different things that sometimes both get described with the words “Christian nationalism.”

On the one hand, there’s a sort of generic, flag-waving, “God Bless America” patriotism that merges with or emerges from some strains of American Christianity. This includes a providential view of American history — the idea that our country and its founding were uniquely blessed and chosen and guided by divine inspiration or even divine intervention. This is influenced by (and exploited by) political ideologies, and it clearly has political implications, but it’s not necessarily a deliberately political view. It mostly comes from personal affection.

It works something like this: I love my God and my church and they are very important to me. I also love my country and it is very important to me. Therefore it is easiest for me to assume that these dual allegiances and dual devotions are (or, at least, can be) unified, thereby also unifying my identity. Because identity is involved, this can be a fraught and frightening assumption, but it doesn’t always become belligerently defensive or politically assertive. People can and do hold this view of godandcountry without feeling threatened by pluralism or perceiving a synagogue in town as cause for alarm.

I have an extremely Baptist aversion to this kind of star-spangled, red-white-and-blue, nationalistic Christianity. An American flag in the sanctuary of a church makes my skin crawl and I’m happy to offer a long-winded, multi-pronged rant about why I consider that an abomination that leads to desolation. I also think this view leads to a shallow, dangerously credulous, form of “my country right or wrong” pseudo-patriotism that abdicates the responsibility of citizenship and weakens our democracy. I could give you a long rant on that subject as well.

But my point here is that many American Christians hold some version of this generic, civil-religious outlook with its mutually reinforcing (and mutually shallowing) merging of patriotism and religion and that they do so without becoming theocrats who want to see the full force of law used to establish, to restrict and to require, their particular form of religion.

And that, of course, is the other thing often referred to as “Christian nationalism.” This is more than just a generic, unexplored vibe of “I love God and I love America.” It is an explicit agenda — a politics — that sees One True Religion as the only legitimate option and thus as the only religion that ought to be recognized and, ultimately, permitted by law. This is the Christian Nationalism that hung Mary Dyer on Boston Common and chased Roger Williams out of Massachusetts. It is the Christian Nationalism of Stuyvesant’s New Amsterdam. It seeks cultural and legal hegemony and formal establishment.

The LDS Church is a helpful case-study for this distinction between these two very different forms of “Christian nationalism” or nationalistic Christianity. The first, generically patriotic version is quite common among Latter-day Saints. They tend to hold a providential view of American history that’s even more explicit than David Barton’s myth making. The Tabernacle Choir at Temple Square (formerly known as the Mormon Tabernacle Choir) can do a very stirring rendition of “God Bless America.”

But most Latter-day Saints also understand that they are — and will likely always be — a minority religion here in America.

Some LDS believers may seek a kind of cultural or even legal hegemony in those parts of Utah where they predominate, but this tends to be more defensive than expansionist — more about seeking enclaves than seeking empire. Latter-day Saints don’t talk about taking over America the way a Reconstructionist like Doug Wilson (Hegseth’s mentor) does. And because they appreciate what it means to be a minority religion — one that has faced real, sometimes lethally violent, persecution — they tend to understand that their own free exercise of religion depends on the Establishment Clause.

When you realize that your particular religion is not likely to be the one that would be established, you’re less susceptible to demagoguery that rails against the separation of church and state or that pretends not to understand that everyone’s free exercise of religion requires secular government and the prohibition of religious establishment.

White evangelicals often indulge in a fantasy of “persecution,” conjuring up imaginary resentments and grievances like a “war on Christmas” or the lack of state-mandated prayer in schools. But the LDS Church can remember actual persecution and thus doesn’t have the luxury of such role-playing. The memory of persecution and the simple arithmetic of being a minority religion usually keeps their patriotic godandcountry impulses from turning into the full-on pursuit of legal hegemony.

Theocratic Christian nationalists often find general support from culturally conservative Latter-day Saints. Back in the ’90s, someone half-jokingly said that the goal of white evangelical politics seemed to be “to make the world safe for Mormons.” Evangelical and conservative Latter-day Saint culture overlap in many ways — the suburban whiteness, the fear of feminism, the antipathy to everything about “the 1960s” and the pretense that this aversion is mainly about Woodstock and not about Selma (even though it’s much more about the latter). The sheer Donny and Marie of it all. So white evangelical political crusaders from Jerry Falwell to Pete Hegseth have always found support for their cause from LDS believers and those LDS believers may even say amen to generic religious-right talk about “taking back America for God.”

But once that talk gets more specific and more insistent about legislating or establishing religion, many LDS folks recognize that they’re not going to be included in the “Christian America” being described and prescribed by evangelical nationalists.

Some religious minorities see the existential threat of sectarian government and sectarian law and respond to that threat to their religious freedom by fighting to defend the First Amendment and the separation of church and state. They recognize that the free exercise of their religion depends upon secular government. This is why most minority religious groups in America have the ACLU on speed dial.

But other religious minorities pursue a different strategy. Some politically ultra-conservative LDS believers or Jews (think of the rabbis who make a living on the Christian-right circuit) seem to think it will be possible for them to carve out some kind of enclave or reservation in the sectarian “Christian America” dreamed of by their theocratic political allies. If they help their friends now, surely their friends will look out for them later.

I think of this as the “Lex Luthor, King of Australia” approach.

“Australia!” (Hackman was terrific, but Lex really should not have a full head of hair.)

Latter-day Saints like Sen. Mike Lee who have hitched their fortunes to the MAGA vision of sectarian rule are like Gene Hackman’s cartoon villain in Superman 2. Luthor figures that General Zod and the other super-powered Kryptonian criminals will probably conquer the whole world, so he offers to help them — hoping to thereby convince them to give him one little piece of that world as his own. Maybe if he helps them take over everything else, they’ll let him have Australia.

There’s a certain logic to such a strategy. But once you kneel before Zod, you’re at Zod’s mercy. And General Zod is not generally known for being merciful.

The generic enthusiasm for flag-waving “God Bless America” civil religion can also be an expression of something like Mike Lee and Lex Luthor’s attempt to transact a deal. Some religious minorities may hope that by performing patriotism and singing along with Lee Greenwood’s greatest hit they will curry favor with the sectarian hegemons and be thought of fondly by them once they come into power. This performance of “patriotism” can be a way for minority religious groups to say “See? Even though we’re not exactly like you, we’re still just like you in some ways — just look at our lapel-pin flags!”

Maybe that works to some extent. But I’m not sure it’s all that effective when you’re dealing with theocratic sectarian Christian nationalists who ultimately view all minority religions as the priests of Baal on Mt. Carmel.

(For a look at a different minority religious group’s attempt to strike a bargain with the sectarian nationalism of the MAGA movement, see Karen E. Park and Emma Cieslik’s report on one Adventist group’s attempt to make a splash at the MAGA-theocrat “Rededicate 250” rally last month on the National Mall.)

* Top officials in the LDS church announced a few years ago that they no longer preferred the use of “Mormon” as a proper noun or adjective. That’s their prerogative and their choice and I don’t have to understand it to respect it. I just wish the change had come with some viable, colloquial alternatives that matched the efficiency of the church’s former terminology, which offered a single two-syllable word for use as both noun and adjective.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 9, 2026

Pentagon rewrites its list of religions (again)

Next Post

June 12, 2026 LBCF: The Last Temptation of Buck

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I remember A: but not B:. It was just A: for floppies and C: for ..."

MG Remoaner

A Psalm for Election Day

""Why would God need a watch?""He doesn't, that's why we know a watchmaker made the ..."

damanoid

The possibility of possibility

"30 minutes just to get to the coffee/tea part."

P J Evans

The possibility of possibility

"Are they Juan Ortiz posters? (I have a book of Next Generation ones and the ..."

Scurra

The possibility of possibility

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who killed Goliath?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samson Jonathan Saul David