Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Re: Rededicate

Re: Rededicate

Last updated on: May 21, 2026 at 4:01 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Re: Rededicate 2026-05-21T16:01:09-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Religion News Service goes for a just-the-facts headline: “Trump allies lead thousands in prayer to ‘rededicate’ America to God on National Mall.” So does NCR: “Thousands flock to the National Mall in Washington for an America-themed prayer rally.” Those give you the who what and where.

Those outlets cover religion news, and this is a story with a religion angle — the Trump allies were leading prayers, the thousands gathered were mixing prayer and worship with their political rallying, a bunch of the celebrities involved run various Christian ministries or work for Christian entertainment companies. But despite the prominence of some of the participants — cabinet secretaries, the speaker of the house, the star of a hit show, several people whose posts sometimes get shared by Catturd — there wasn’t a lot of actual news here. Not a lot of story to this story: Thousands gather to do religiously flavored political thing.

Tens of thousands, probably. Not quite as many thousands as flocked to Citi Field that same day to rededicate themselves to the Subway Series, but maybe that’s not a fair comparison. “Rededicate 250” may have featured the biggest celebrities in MAGA Christianity — Pete Hegseth! Eric Metaxas! Franklin Graham! Mike Johnson! The Other Falwell! — but that’s still not quite the star power of Aaron Judge or Carson Benge.

“Rededicate 250” was a weird event, befitting the narrow-spectrum diversity of its lineup of celebrity speakers. This was a mix of NeoConfederate Southern Baptists, New Apostolic Reformation dominionist Pentecostals, Ultra-Calvinist Reconstructionists, End Times Protestant Zionists, and various strivers and climbers of the sort who will show up wherever there’s a camera and a microphone.

Many of these folks are often described — accurately — as “Christian Nationalists,” but it’s important to recognize that their various preferred forms of Christian nationalism are ultimately incompatible. Each imagines and desires a different specific form of sectarian hegemony — an America in which their own particular sect is established and privileged, with all of those competing Christian nationalist varieties consigned to the second tier of second-class, conditional citizenship and whatever second-class rights they deign to allow for Quakers, Freethinkers, Jews, Slavs, Catholics, Black people and maybe the Irish.

These disparate, competing groups are capable of calling a temporary truce to join together for an event like “Rededicate 250” — or any other Trump campaign rally, — but in the end there can be only one. The subtle ways the representatives of these different factions of Christianist authoritarianism advocated for their particular strain above and against the others present were interesting, but still not big news because, again, a mid-sized Trump rally that he couldn’t even bother to attend in person is just not a big news story.

Trump would not have had to travel to attend the event in the park just down the street from the White House, but instead he spent the day golfing. He did send a pre-recorded video to play for his fans, but it wasn’t new material — it was the same video he’d done for the recent Museum of the Bible event, in which he read from 2 Chronicles 7.

That passage was chosen for Trump to read because its a story of national religious “rededication” leading to peace and prosperity. It includes the famous 2 Chronicles 7:14, in which it says that God says: “If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.”

It continues to be funny that the organizers of these events are trying to associate Donald Trump with humbling himself.

“Humble themselves” is one of the conditions this passage insists must be met for a nation that desires forgiveness, healing, and prosperity. “Rededication,” it says, is contingent upon humility, prayer, and turning away from wickedness. “Rededicate 250” had a lot of prayer.

So, 1-out-of-3.

The event was, as Dorothy Thompson’s second husband might have said,* “wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” It was a day-long effort by a bunch of compromised media personalities to equate “rededication to God” with dedication to Trump. That might have been a big news story back in 2015, but in 2026 this same shtick from this same sad bunch is neither new nor news.

For those of us shaped by or raised in white evangelicalism, the name of this event prevents us from regarding anything about it as meaningful. We know from extensive, intimate experience that “rededication” is a fleeting wisp of nothingness — the very symbol of inconsequence and inconstancy.

We know this because we have all “rededicated our lives to Christ” more times than we could count. We did this sincerely. We really meant it, every time. And we did not mean to mean it any less each time, but the staggering repetition of hearing our own voices say”No, but seriously, this time I really do really mean it!” ultimately becomes the only thing we know to be true about that supposedly earnest experience.

“Rededication” is like quitting smoking. For someone who does it once, or maybe even twice, it can be a meaningful act that indicates a genuine change in that person’s life. But if someone does it dozens of times it is not at all meaningful. It’s just a bitter joke.

Everybody in my church youth group rededicated our lives to Christ more often than we got our hair cut. We did it weekly or monthly for years, routinely registering to attend multiple regular events where we planned and expected to do this again and again and again. We dutifully and routinely raised our hands or came forward at every altar call to rededicate our lives to Christ and to re-reedicate, and to re-re-rededicate, until we all sounded like Aretha’s background singers — “Re, re, re, re, re, re, re, re … sock it to me, sock it to me, sock it to me …”

None of that negates our sincerity or our genuine pathos. Every one of those rededications was an emotional experience. But that emotion and passion had nowhere to go and so that is where it went — nowhere. Because this faith of constant revival and renewal and rebirth was an otherworldly faith that carried no content or substance or responsibility beyond some vague notion of abstinence from a very limited and limiting understanding of “sin.” It asked nothing of us and gave us nothing to do except to return to the next rally or retreat or service where we might again be invited to rededicate and re-rededicate our lives to Christ.

“Rededication” is the action of those whose initial dedication has failed. We had to perpetually “rededicate” our lives because we were incapable of any lasting dedication. And that is because our heavenly minded faith offered nothing in this world for us to be dedicated to. We were thus incapable of dedication and could be dedicated only to an endless cycle of rededication.

The only difference between the “rededication” at all of those countless youth group rallies and the Rededicate 250 rally held last weekend was that the latter was held on the National Mall.

If any of those in attendance had wanted to think more deeply about what “dedication” might mean if it were allowed to have meaning, they were just a short walk away from the perfect place to ponder that. The Lincoln Memorial was right behind them, where the words of the Gettysburg Address are carved into stone. “Dedication” is a thread woven throughout that great manifesto:

We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. “But in a larger sense we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us,that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion, that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Between that address and Lincoln’s Second Inaugural — carved into the opposing wall of the memorial — you can see how different it looks when all of the conditional conditions of that verse from 2 Chronicles are met. When it’s not just hollow, show-off-y prayer, but actual humility and repentance made tangible by turning away from the wickedness woven into this nation since before its first, failed founding.

That same wickedness — the original, undemocratic wickedness of America’s original, undemocratic Constitution before it was transformed and reborn through the Reconstruction Amendments — was really the thing to which “Rededicate 250” was dedicated. It was dedicated to the rejection of the great task Lincoln described and to the reversal of that cause for which the Americans who died at Gettysburg gave the last full measure of devotion. That is what “MAGA” means and that is, ultimately, all that it means.

The “celebrity” speakers at Rededicate 250 may have recited talk about their desire to “dedicate America to God,” but such talk of “dedication to God,” coming from them, is best understood as meaning that they intend to do to America what Jephthah did to his daughter. She was also “dedicated to God.” This is the only “dedication” they understand, and it will result in death and ashes.

* The statement that “When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross” works as a rough summary of Sinclair Lewis’s theme in his 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here. It describes the way the fictional dictator, Buzz Windrip, rises to power in that book. But the quote itself cannot be found in anything Lewis wrote.

Or in anything that Dorothy Thompson wrote, either, in her many writings about the American potential for American fascism. It’s always useful to re-read her fiercely clear-eyed August 1941 essay “Who Goes Nazi?” Thompson certainly saw the danger that her then-husband wrote about in It Can’t Happen Here, with its cross-carrying, star-spangled demagoguery and jingoism. But her essay is less concerned with the ideologues and theocrats than with the unprincipled strivers and climbers whose resentment and sense of entitlement would make them willing to go along with anything. The sight of delegates to the Republican National Convention gleefully waving placards calling for “Mass Deportation Now” would not have surprised her.

“Who Goes Nazi?” is “an amusing game,” Thompson writes. “Try it at the next big party you go to.”

And it works for the big party the MAGA Christians threw last weekend. J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio — the ultimate embodiments of Thompson’s “Mr. C” — were not at Rededicate 250, but Eric Metaxas was there to represent that faction. (Metaxas, famously, likes to portray himself as Bonhoeffer, but he nothing like the Bonhoeffer character in Thompson’s essay — and there is one, a theology student who studied under Barth! Eric Metaxas is Mr. C, through and through.)

Pete Hegesth is surely “Young Mr. D” — the “spoiled son” who “spends his time at the game of seeing what he can get away with.” Franklin Graham is another Young D, even if he’s not so young anymore.

Mike Johnson is a gender-swapped Mrs. E (“So sweet, so clinging, so cowed. She is a masochist. She is married to a man who never ceases to humiliate her”).

Sammy Rodriguez is Mr. J., but he’s destined for the same fate as Mr. G. (“We may be sure that Mr. G would be a Nazi with purse-lipped qualifications. He would certainly be purged.”)

We could go on. It’s an amusing game but, as Thompson understood, not really.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 20, 2026

Postcards from America (5.20.26)

Next Post

May 22, 2026 LBCF: Skipping steps

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I wonder if the listing isn't from the Wal itself, just trying to do a ..."

Ross

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Yeah, there's a flashback where she's interviewing Superman and her assistant is like "Hey I ..."

Ross

‘A hermeneutical Pandora’s box’

"I know a few people who have JDs but are not lawyers"

Ross

The purpose-driven labor priest

"Both Elon and the White House want Zelenskyy to give up and let Russia win, ..."

Ross

The purpose-driven labor priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I include truth, righteousness, the gospel, faith, salvation, and the Spirit. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The shield of faith The armor of God Spiritual weapons The breastplate of righteousness