Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
You can be the president, I’d rather be the …

You can be the president, I’d rather be the …

Last updated on: April 20, 2026 at 2:10 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

You can be the president, I’d rather be the … 2026-04-20T14:10:19-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

• This RNS headline reflects just one of the reasons it’s unwise for politicians to pick fights with clergy: “Pope doubles down on peace and unity message as Trump’s criticism continues.”

The political headline cliché just becomes weirdly funny when applied to a pope. The gambling metaphor (“doubles down”) doesn’t really work here given that this is not the first time that Leo specifically, or his many predecessors, have repeated a “peace and unity message.” The “politician not backing down” framing here treats the pope like he was Thomas Massie, the conservative Kentucky Republican representative in Congress who has criticized Trump on the Epstein files and other issues. But all that framing does is underscore how very much the pope, being the pope, is very much not at all like Massie.

Oh, the president is turning the full power of “the bully pulpit” toward bullying Leo? Well, how many pulpits has the pope?

The opposite political cliché headline — “Pope backs down on peace and unity after Trump’s criticism” — is unimaginable. And it would be unimaginable even if Leo were the relatively powerless pastor of some small nondenominational congregation — at least when it comes to such basic, almost generic, core religious values as “peace and unity.”

You can think of it as a matter of home-field advantage. When clergy stray from core themes like “peace and unity” and wade into political matters far afield from that — as some right-wing US Catholic bishops like to do — they’re playing on the politicians’ home turf. But politicians have nothing to gain from picking a fight on religious leaders’ home field of “peace and unity.”

And Trump very much chose to have this fight on Leo’s turf and according to Leo’s terms — the broadest possible terms of “peace and unity are Good Things” vs. “No, they’re not.” The president is going to lose that fight with the pope for the same reason he lost his fight with the king of Latin trap. When Bad Bunny said “The only thing more powerful than hate is love,” Trump chose to respond as though this were an attack on him personally. He chose sides — choosing “hate” as his own personal side in the generic contrast of hate vs. love. That doesn’t mean that Bad Bunny is “doubling down” every subsequent time he affirms the goodness of love, it just means that Trump made the foolish choice of framing this fight in a way that makes it impossible for him to win.

The same thing has happened here. Pope Leo spoke of “peace and unity,” condemning war as a carelessly chosen and carelessly conducted first choice. Trump chose to frame that as a personal attack because, according to Trump, it is obvious that anyone advocating “peace and unity” is opposing him and because, according to Trump himself, his own war was started and is being conducted carelessly. Now — because of Trump’s own choice to frame the dispute this way — every time anyone, anywhere speaks positively of peace and unity, they’re “doubling down” against him, defying his power and exposing his powerlessness.

It seems unlikely he’ll ultimately win this argument by tweeting his way through it, but it seems he’s determined to try.

• Evan Hurst responds to comments from Lauren Boebert. Hurst notes the important distinction between “horny” and “predatory,” That distinction seems to elude Boebert, even though it should be personally important to her because it explains why the behavior of men like Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzalez merits their expulsion from Congress but her behavior at that performance of Beetlejuice doesn’t.

This is example number eleventy-billion of the “conservative” inability to comprehend the essential importance of consent in any discussion of sexual ethics. This, again, tends to be expressed as hostility to any mention of it, in a move that’s so obtuse that it seems suspiciously like deliberate bad-faith.

Any Normal Person: Consent is necessary. Without consent, no sexual behavior can be ethical.

Conservative: So you’re saying consent is sufficient — that as long as there’s consent, “Anything goes”?

ANP: No, I said “necessary,” not suff–

Conservative: “Anything goes!” This is why we must never mention or allow anyone to think of consent.

They have been doing this forever. Either they are afflicted with some defect that prevents them from comprehending elementary truths or they are arguing in bad faith because, for whatever reason, they personally prefer a world in which consent has no consequence.

• The title for this post comes from Prince’s “Pope” (lyrically NSFW), which makes amusingly filthy, sexually swaggering use of an extended metaphor. I mean, yes, Joëlle Rollo-Koster, professor of medieval history and chief editor of the Cambridge History of the Papacy, has some helpful historical context on the question of “What Happens When Sacred and Secular Power Collide?” But you can’t dance to it.

We could spend some time pondering how Prince’s song might speak to those in right-wing MAGA world for whom “cuck” has become the most frequently invoked insult, but that would probably spoil the man’s joke. So instead let’s just ponder how the rapping on this 1993 track is light-years beyond, say, the break in “Alphabet Street” from 1988, and then we can enjoy a round of the impossible argument about what genre best describes Prince’s music.

The image above comes from the other song I thought about referencing in the title — “What’s So Funny ‘Bout Peace, Love & Understanding?” That image is from Elvis Costello’s version, but here’s the Postmodern Jukebox arrangement.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 19, 2026

Sunday reading

Next Post

April 22, 2026 They got to the part with the cattle and the creeping things

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Hope he enjoyed that last cheque, because he’s on notice now."

Matri

The purpose-driven labor priest

"*Snerk*"

Daniel McLellan

The purpose-driven labor priest

"No, actually, it's a couple on fb and Instagram.my FB is mostly political of late. ..."

Daniel McLellan

The purpose-driven labor priest

"I get that couple on Instagram, not Facebook. Which is funny, because I'm pretty sure ..."

Daniel McLellan

The purpose-driven labor priest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am the wage you've earned through sin, but my opposite is a gift freely given. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Punishment Hell Separation Death