Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Ellie Bartowski’s ‘DEI’ wedding and Huck and Jim

Ellie Bartowski’s ‘DEI’ wedding and Huck and Jim

Last updated on: December 8, 2025 at 7:00 am by Fred Clark

0 Comments

Ellie Bartowski’s ‘DEI’ wedding and Huck and Jim 2025-12-08T02:45:35-05:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The now-defunct British duo Slow Club learned from Charles Brown in writing the lovely, wistful Christmas song that proved their biggest hit. That song, “Christmas TV,” is now a part of the “contemporary” Christmas music streaming at work. Its catchy, happy-sad refrain of “Just come on home, just come on home, home, home” reminds me a little of Brown’s “Please Come Home for Christmas.” It also reminds me a little of all the “Stomp, Clap, Hey” pop-folk that became a trend a few years later

Mainly, though, what “Christmas TV” makes me think of is seeing Chevy Chase getting gunned down like Moe Green in the big baptism scene in The Godfather.

Let me explain, for those who don’t remember watching the second season of Chuck back in 2009. That season ended with the wedding of Chuck’s sister, Ellie, and her longtime doctor boyfriend, Devon (aka “Captain Awesome”). Their church wedding is interrupted, and ruined, thanks to the intervention of that season’s main villain, played by Chase. He gets arrested and Chuck arranges a beautiful beach wedding for Ellie and Awesome and it unfolds as a big montage that tips its hat to that scene from The Godfather, interspersing scenes of the happy couple and scenes in which Chase is murdered by an agent of the following season’s even worse main villain.

Hearing the song from that scene made me go watch it again. It’s still a lot of fun. It includes almost all the familiar faces from the show — the secret agents from Chuck’s secret life and the screwballs and screw-ups from his day job in retail.*

But it’s not Chuck’s wedding, it’s Ellie and Awesome’s big day and so the scene is also full of unfamiliar faces, with lots of their friends and colleagues from the hospital where they both work. Other than Chuck and his girlfriend/spy/handler Sarah, we viewers don’t recognize anybody from the wedding party. Who are these people?

The other groomsmen and bridesmaids in the scene — Ellie and Awesome’s dearest friends — are all doctors from a TV hospital, so we see an ethnically diverse bunch of young, implausibly good-looking people.

The headline cast for Chuck was mostly white, but the background diversity at Ellie’s wedding (sometimes very background) wasn’t new for the show. Right off the bat, in the pilot episode, when Ellie throws a birthday party for her brother to introduce him to the kind of responsible women she hopes will force him to grow up, we see that Ellie and Awesome’s friends from the hospital are a diverse (and implausibly attractive) bunch.

These occasional reminders that Ellie Bartowski has Black friends is the kind of thing often criticized as tokenism — a form of bare-minimum representation performed in lieu of actual equality or inclusivity. And even such minimal, tangential inclusion is also often criticized as “woke” — the current term for what was, back during the early 2000s run of the show, still sneered at as “political correctness.”

Those opposite criticisms are sometimes presented as two sides of a “culture war” raging between liberals and conservatives.

But that’s not entirely what’s going on here. This isn’t about any current “culture war” so much as it is about one that was already fought — and won, decisively — ages ago. This has to do with the morality of white supremacy, which was the subject of more than merely a culture war. What’s now described as the “conservative” side of that war lost, and the totality and enormity of that loss accounts for their lingering bitterness over the sight of Black characters in a wedding party in the background of a TV show.

Those background characters are, in fact, tokens — symbols rather than characters. They are Black because Ellie and Awesome are white, and thus they are ambiguous and suspect characters — their character is suspect and ambiguous. We do not know if they are Good Guys or Bad Guys in this story and the age-old shorthand way of indicating which they are is to show us that these white characters have Black friends.

That sounds like the worst kind of white-liberal-guilt nonsense, and it often is that. It’s often sloppy and slapdash and reductive. It resembles the defensive move employed by every white person just after or just before they say or do something that seems kind of racist, where they loudly insist that others mustn’t ever accuse them of being such because they “have Black friends.” That move resembles this because it is an imitation of this — an attempt to establish oneself as a “Good Guy” by imitating the way we’ve all seen and read dozens of stories establishing that, even long before television. American stories have been doing this for generations. The quickest way to establish the virtue of a white character in an American story is to show that character’s friendly relationship with a Black person.

This isn’t some post-Civil Rights Movement phenomenon or relic of the 1960s. It’s a shorthand language that storytellers and their audiences have understood since Rick and Sam or Huck and Jim.

Is this often dismissive or condescending or tokenistic or problematic in countless other ways? Yes. Yes it is. It often centers and foregrounds white characters while reducing Black characters to subhuman symbols and accessories who serve only to support them. And it caters to white people’s desperate desire to be granted an unearned atonement, to be given a Get Out of History Free card, to be exempted from hegemony, and to be acknowledged as One Of The Good Ones. None of that is great.

Somebody with more time and learning and insight than me could write volumes about all the problems with this hoary trope of the Black friend as a signal of the white character’s virtue. (And plenty of such people have written such volumes.) There are very many and very large problems with this device. It’s problematic in many of the same ways that corporate “DEI” programs are problematic. And it can convey or involve the same smug shallowness that undermines those efforts.

But I’m not writing here either to critique this device or to defend it. My point here is simply that it persists because it works — because it effectively communicates that This White Character Is Good (or, at least, that This White Character Is Not All Bad).

And it communicates this effectively even to those angrily denouncing it as “woke” or “P.C.” This is part of what makes them so angry.

They catch those brief, fleeting glimpses of Ellie’s diverse bridesmaids flitting through the background with no speaking parts and they both understand and accept the shorthand message that this signals. They accept that this underscores that the white character in question is not a hateful person or an exclusive person or someone clinging to imagined hierarchies in which she is entitled to superiority. And they accept this as valid evidence that this character is, in short, good. They understand that this weird American signaling works and why it works and that it works even for them, and that infuriates them because it reminds them that they have chosen and continue to choose to be on the villainous side of this long-ago settled cultural question.

Even the loudest and most adamantly anti-DEI MAGAnauts — people as far right as Adam Baldwin — who witness a character making even the slightest demonstration of the virtues of diversity, equality, and inclusion will perceive those virtues as virtuous. This is, to them, intolerable. It makes them mad and drives them mad because they perceive it as a personal attack. If a fictional character who has made choices that I refuse to make is thereby portrayed and perceived as good (even by me), then I am being portrayed and perceived as bad (even by me).

And we can’t even try to calm them down by reassuring them that, no, no, no — this is just a TV show … it doesn’t really mean anything and it has nothing to do with you. Because we know that they know it does mean something and that that something has everything to do with them.

They understand the situtation, so I’m not sure what we can say to them other than something much like “Just come on home, just come on home home home.”

* Speaking of day jobs in retail … December is a fundraising month here at the blog because, well, because we need it to be. A lot. (Sorry, thank you.) So here again is my PayPal link. And here again is my Venmo: @George-Clark-61. Thanks again.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 7, 2025

I don't even know the words to that song 'Louie Louie'

Next Post

December 8, 2025 Say you can't sleep, baby, I know

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The problem is that people confuse Yule, Advent, and Christmas. Advent is in the middle ..."

MarjaE2

On the aesthetics of Saddam Hussein

"I'm hoping he has extra-special stuff saved for him and the techbroligarchs."

P J Evans

On the aesthetics of Saddam Hussein

"Death be like "I promise I'm TRYING, but the decent people just keep on being ..."

Ross

On the aesthetics of Saddam Hussein

"I suspect Melania knows where at least some of the bodies are buried, hence her ..."

Vucodlak

On the aesthetics of Saddam Hussein

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which city was destroyed by fire and brimstone along with Gomorrah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Babylon Nineveh Jericho Sodom