Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
‘Whoever does not love does not know’

‘Whoever does not love does not know’

Last updated on: October 1, 2025 at 3:25 pm by Fred Clark

0 Comments

‘Whoever does not love does not know’ 2025-10-01T15:25:27-04:00 Fred Clark

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On one level, I think their confusion is genuine. Moral choice is a factor, but it’s not only and entirely a matter of rejection. It’s also a matter of comprehension and incomprehension.

These are related and intertwined, each both a contributing cause and a resulting effect of the other. Our MAGA neighbors reject the things they reject, in part, because they find them bewildering and confusing. They attack “social justice” and mercy and empathy and Jubilee and diversity and equity and inclusion and humanitarian aid and disaster aid and care of any kind for other people because they find these things incomprehensible. And they are unable to comprehend these things, in part, because they choose to reject them.

So, to pick one recent example, I think John Fea and Paul Campos were both correct when they observed that Donald Trump’s remarks at the memorial service for a murdered MAGA activist constituted an explicit rejection of the core of Christianity. After watching the slain man’s widow publicly state that she had forgiven his killer and would be praying for him, Trump offered a rebuttal to that idea and attitude. “I hate my opponents,” Trump said. “I don’t want what’s best for them.”

Campos rightly calls this “sheer public apostasy” and notes that “The Trump cult is as extreme a perversion of Christianity as it’s possible to imagine, and that Donald Trump is doing at least as much to destroy Christianity in America as he is to destroy liberal democracy.”

Fea is equally blunt: “If we define the message of Christ in terms of forgiveness, love of neighbor, and love of enemy, then Trump’s words make him an anti-Christ.”

All true and accurate and fair.

But I think it’s also partly true that Trump wasn’t only rejecting these core aspects of Christianity, he was also boggling at them in genuine confusion.

The two great “love” chapters in the New Testament — 1 Corinthians 13 and 1 John 4 — are both concerned as much with epistemology as they are with ethics. Love is what we must do, but also love is how we know what is true.

“Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God,” 1 John says. “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.” Another way of putting that would be to say “Whoever rejects love cannot understand God.” Or maybe “cannot even begin to understand God.”

This combination of moral obstinacy and its accompanying bewilderment isn’t just true of Trump and MAGA’s rejection of loving enemies and of “forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.” It also describes their rejection and incomprehension of what they call “social justice” — which is to say justice for other people.

They dimly grasp some aspect of justice in that they are extremely attuned to any instance in which they feel that they personally are being treated unfairly. “That’s not fair!” they’ll cry, like a small child watching another child getting a cookie when they didn’t get one. That childish cry for fairness isn’t wrong, but it’s incomplete. We all wailed like that as small children — “It’s not fair!” — when we imagined we were being excluded or denied something. But we didn’t yet understand enough about the world outside of our own selves to ever yowl that same thing when we witnessed someone else being excluded or denied something.

Everybody understands “justice” when they’re the one who didn’t get a cookie. Even Trump and his MAGA followers get that. But if some “social justice warrior” points out that someone else is being denied a cookie and says, “That’s not fair,” this confounds and confuses them. So what? That person is not me. So that’s not a matter of justice, merely of “social justice,” and that’s just some sin-of-empathy, woke-mind-virus, cultural Marxism argle bargle.

And since they cannot comprehend justice for other people, they cannot comprehend the enormous moral authority of appeals to justice and of condemnations of injustice. The power and eloquence of King or Douglass or Baldwin sounds, to them, like mere noise — sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal. They dimly grasp that this justice and injustice business seems compelling to other people in a way that threatens their grasp on power, but they cannot perceive why or how that is the case.

So they guess that it has something to do with “victimhood” and with “playing the victim card.” And then they think that perhaps they can counter this weird and confusing moral authority by “playing the victim card” themselves. They seek to usurp this moral authority by competitive displays of indignation.

This fails, of course, because the perpetrators and beneficiaries of injustice are not in any meaningful or true sense victims. And it fails because it was never about “victimhood” — it was about the moral power of justice. But, again, they are unable to understand that.

And so they mistakenly guess that their initial efforts at competitive indignation failed because their attempt to perform indignation was unconvincing. That’s probably the case — people who think empathy is a “sin” don’t tend to be good at acting — but that’s not why it failed. So they work to make their feigned indignation seem more plausible. They rehearse and rehearse and rehearse, rewriting and revising their scripts, until they are able to present a performance of “victimhood” and indignation that closely mirrors the genuine article.

When even that much-improved performance of magical victimhood fails to earn them the same moral authority wielded by those speaking for actual justice they wind up even more confused and frustrated than before.

So, yes, it’s partly that Trump and MAGA are sheer apostates and anti-Christs. But it’s also partly that they are genuinely bewildered and bereft, unable to understand the language that other people are speaking because they are unable to understand that other people are also people.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 29, 2025

Good for us all for saying that murder is Bad

Next Post

October 6, 2025 America's heel turn celebrated with its own Loonie

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I think we need a corollary to Betteridge's law of headlines, where if the question ..."

Brandi

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Matri

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Matri

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

"https://uploads.disquscdn.c..."

Matri

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category class warfare evangelicals Iraq Left Behind Mammon music Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jesus Paul David Isaiah